You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This PR fixesBears-R-Us#3222, the series of segaray print bug. The bug was due to pandas series erroring an ndarray where each element is a list, but it handles a list of lists just fine. So we just call `to_list` instead of `to_ndarray` for the segarray case
This PR fixesBears-R-Us#3222, the series of segaray print bug. The bug was due to pandas series erroring an ndarray where each element is a list, but it handles a list of lists just fine. So we just call `to_list` instead of `to_ndarray` for the segarray case
* Fixes 3222: series of segarray print bug
This PR fixes#3222, the series of segaray print bug. The bug was due to pandas series erroring an ndarray where each element is a list, but it handles a list of lists just fine. So we just call `to_list` instead of `to_ndarray` for the segarray case
* added test in response to PR feedback
---------
Co-authored-by: Tess Hayes <[email protected]>
I discovered this when working with dataframes containing segarrays since the recent change in df indexing (see #3109) has changed what is returned
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: