[FEATURE] Filter Github Issues by label

[Bashamega]

Is this a unique feature?

• I have checked "open" AND "closed" issues and this is not a duplicate

Is your feature request related to a problem/unavailable functionality? Please describe.

Hello:)
We should enable the user to filter GitHub Issues by label.

Proposed Solution

When the user clicks on a label it should filter the content.

Screenshots

No response

Do you want to work on this issue?

No

If "yes" to above, please explain how you would technically implement this (issue will not be assigned if this is skipped)

No response

[github-actions]

Hello! 👋 Thanks for opening this issue. We appreciate your feedback and will look into it as soon as possible. Feel free to add more details if necessary.

[devendra0009]

hi @Bashamega , i think github label filter is working . Can you record a video and post the specific issue?

[Bashamega]

hi @Bashamega , i think github label filter is working . Can you record a video and post the specific issue?

When you click on a label nothing happens

[devendra0009]

is this the label you are referring to ? If so it is working ok and filtering the github issues

[Bashamega]

I mean add the option to filter be clicking on the label on the issue.

[dax4y]

Hello,
my name is Dominik. I am a student of Technical University in Kosice and software developer in NESS Košice.

As part of our course in school is to help some project with issue on GitHub, I would be happy if I could work on this issue, if it is sill relevant ?
Thanks for the answer.

[Bashamega]

Hello,
my name is Dominik. I am a student of Technical University in Kosice and software developer in NESS Košice.

As part of our course in school is to help some project with issue on GitHub, I would be happy if I could work on this issue, if it is sill relevant ?
Thanks for the answer.

Hello :)
Sure, you can, work on it

[dax4y]

Hey,
I have a couple of suggestions and ideas how to improve this search:

1. It would be nice to have options for entering additional label values in filter, not just defaults (e.g. I would like to search GitHub tags by Java so I will add it by some input in "Filter-Modal" component and it will appear in the filter with checkbox)
2. I think, that it would be more consistent and clearer, when that colored labels (which can be added by filter or now by clicking on them) will appears somewhere on the top in exact same color (now I need to all the time open FILTER by clicking and check which labels are selected)
3. Also additional reverse functionality which by clicking on the label will delete this label from filter
4. This one is more complex but maybe nice to have. I will save [label.id]'s in the URL address so when someone will refresh page, selected labels in filter won't be lost

I hope all of this makes sense and let me know what do you guys think.
Thanks.
D.

[Bashamega]

Hey,
I have a couple of suggestions and ideas how to improve this search:

1. It would be nice to have options for entering additional label values in filter, not just defaults (e.g. I would like to search GitHub tags by Java so I will add it by some input in "Filter-Modal" component and it will appear in the filter with checkbox)
2. I think, that it would be more consistent and clearer, when that colored labels (which can be added by filter or now by clicking on them) will appears somewhere on the top in exact same color (now I need to all the time open FILTER by clicking and check which labels are selected)
3. Also additional reverse functionality which by clicking on the label will delete this label from filter
4. This one is more complex but maybe nice to have. I will save [label.id]'s in the URL address so when someone will refresh page, selected labels in filter won't be lost

I hope all of this makes sense and let me know what do you guys think.
Thanks.
D.

Sure. You can create prs for it

[dax4y]

Hey,
I would like to ask you, if I can add some test coverage for this implementation ? I think it would only help :)

Thanks.
D.

[Bashamega]

Hey, I would like to ask you, if I can add some test coverage for this implementation ? I think it would only help :)

Thanks. D.

Sure