Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[AutoPR azure-resourcemanager-storagecache] Dev/adburch/2022 01 01 #11712

Conversation

openapi-sdkautomation[bot]
Copy link

@openapi-sdkautomation openapi-sdkautomation bot commented Dec 9, 2021

Create to sync Azure/azure-rest-api-specs#17034

curl -L "https://portal.azure-devex-tools.com/api/sdk-dl-pub?p=Azure/17034/azure-sdk-for-java/azure-resourcemanager-storagecache/azure-resourcemanager-storagecache-1.0.0-beta.5.jar" -o azure-resourcemanager-storagecache-1.0.0-beta.5.jar
mvn install:install-file -DgroupId=com.azure.resourcemanager -DartifactId=azure-resourcemanager-storagecache -Dversion=1.0.0-beta.0 -Dfile=azure-resourcemanager-storagecache-1.0.0-beta.5.jar -Dpackaging=jar -DgeneratePom=true

@openapi-sdkautomation openapi-sdkautomation bot force-pushed the sdkAuto/17034/azure-resourcemanager-storagecache branch from e18f449 to 8e6344d Compare December 9, 2021 17:36
@openapi-sdkautomation openapi-sdkautomation bot force-pushed the main branch 3 times, most recently from 94af3ba to 4fdff29 Compare February 12, 2022 01:13
@openapi-sdkautomation openapi-sdkautomation bot force-pushed the sdkAuto/17034/azure-resourcemanager-storagecache branch 4 times, most recently from 651927d to 21f7d9a Compare March 3, 2022 21:02
Merge 41cfea92024b4951ace6c6b46da1288581b0b9d9 into 6b29b8552671eded065f51ee1b291582ab8cc149
@openapi-sdkautomation openapi-sdkautomation bot force-pushed the sdkAuto/17034/azure-resourcemanager-storagecache branch from 21f7d9a to 622042b Compare March 3, 2022 21:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants