Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 21, 2025. It is now read-only.

Release for new typespec version #782

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

markcowl
Copy link
Member

Cadl Ranch Contribution Checklist:

  • I have written a scenario spec
  • I have meaningful @scenario names. Someone can look at the list of scenarios and understand what I'm covering.
  • I have written a mock API
  • I have used @scenarioDocs for extra scenario description and to tell people how to pass my mock api check.

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Dec 11, 2024

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: dda71f7

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
{
"name": "@azure-tools/cadl-ranch-specs",
"version": "0.39.5",
"version": "1.0.0",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Interesting - it looks like this did a major version bump.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

oh, silly, and good catch

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I didn't look at it closely because it was fully auto-generated

@markcowl markcowl closed this Dec 12, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants