Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add override resourcegraph #17866

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 8, 2021
Merged

Conversation

zhangyan133
Copy link
Contributor

#override azure-mgmt-resourcegraph msrest>=0.6.21

@check-enforcer
Copy link

check-enforcer bot commented Apr 7, 2021

This pull request is protected by Check Enforcer.

What is Check Enforcer?

Check Enforcer helps ensure all pull requests are covered by at least one check-run (typically an Azure Pipeline). When all check-runs associated with this pull request pass then Check Enforcer itself will pass.

Why am I getting this message?

You are getting this message because Check Enforcer did not detect any check-runs being associated with this pull request within five minutes. This may indicate that your pull request is not covered by any pipelines and so Check Enforcer is correctly blocking the pull request being merged.

What should I do now?

If the check-enforcer check-run is not passing and all other check-runs associated with this PR are passing (excluding license-cla) then you could try telling Check Enforcer to evaluate your pull request again. You can do this by adding a comment to this pull request as follows:
/check-enforcer evaluate
Typically evaulation only takes a few seconds. If you know that your pull request is not covered by a pipeline and this is expected you can override Check Enforcer using the following command:
/check-enforcer override
Note that using the override command triggers alerts so that follow-up investigations can occur (PRs still need to be approved as normal).

What if I am onboarding a new service?

Often, new services do not have validation pipelines associated with them, in order to bootstrap pipelines for a new service, you can issue the following command as a pull request comment:
/azp run prepare-pipelines
This will run a pipeline that analyzes the source tree and creates the pipelines necessary to build and validate your pull request. Once the pipeline has been created you can trigger the pipeline using the following comment:
/azp run python - [service] - ci

@zhangyan133
Copy link
Contributor Author

/check-enforcer evaluate

@zhangyan133
Copy link
Contributor Author

/check-enforcer override

@msyyc
Copy link
Member

msyyc commented Apr 8, 2021

/check-enforcer override

@msyyc msyyc merged commit c1af73f into Azure:master Apr 8, 2021
mccoyp pushed a commit to mccoyp/azure-sdk-for-python that referenced this pull request Apr 9, 2021
Co-authored-by: Yan Zhang (WICRESOFT NORTH AMERICA LTD) <[email protected]>
mccoyp pushed a commit to mccoyp/azure-sdk-for-python that referenced this pull request Apr 13, 2021
Co-authored-by: Yan Zhang (WICRESOFT NORTH AMERICA LTD) <[email protected]>
benbp pushed a commit to benbp/azure-sdk-for-python that referenced this pull request Apr 19, 2021
Co-authored-by: Yan Zhang (WICRESOFT NORTH AMERICA LTD) <[email protected]>
openapi-sdkautomation bot pushed a commit to AzureSDKAutomation/azure-sdk-for-python that referenced this pull request Apr 8, 2022
New Api-Version onboarding 2021-12-01-preview (Azure#18478)

* Adding 2021-12-01-preview as a copy of 2021-08-01

* Readme update

* Updating version in the 2021-12-01-preview folder

* update description for keyvault contract (Azure#17150)

Co-authored-by: Kacie Kang <[email protected]>

* fix for the last cherry pick (06d2de8)

* fixing readme again

* APIM Policy fragments (Azure#16403)

* Adding the policy fragments spec

* Formatting

* Updating descriptions

* PolicyFragmentIdParameter as a string

* ID validation

* Adding fragment description

* Adding policy fragment format

* Adding raw xml format

* Addinga 202 response for creating/updating

* Generalising the resource collection

* formatting

* Moving everything to 2021-12-01

* version fix

* Adding pagination params. Generalising the IdParam

* Adding missing fields, fixing id param name

* Removing link formats. Fixing format param name

* POST list references

* name filter now supports "contains"

* PUT is always async

* Fixing header location url

* PUT can now return 200 and 201

* Adding more OData query support. Fixing examples.

* Resolving the cross breaking change

Co-authored-by: Milan Zolota <[email protected]>

* Added CORS and CSP configuration resources (Azure#16822)

* Added CORS and CSP settings resources.

* Added missing definitions.

* Added suppression of R4009 for apimportalsettings.json.

* Ran Prettier.

* Renamed definitions.

* Fixed references.

* Updated examples.

* Reversed change.

* Created new resource for portal settings.

* Added list example.

* Added missing collection contract.

* Added missing example. Cleaned up old ones.

* Fixed references.

* Fixed examples

* Fixed version.

* Added custom words. Fixed linting.

* Fixes.

* Fixes.

* Fixes.

* Fixes.

* Fixes.

* Fixes.

* Fixes.

* Fixes.

* Fixes.

* Fixes.

* Fixes

* Fixes.

* Fixes.

* Fixes

* Fixes

* Removed conflicting constraint.

* Updated readme.go.md.

* Reverted removing the restriction.

* Revert "Reverted removing the restriction."

This reverts commit 72d070f6ccc8231e4d4c9f22ac3a9c3090a545aa.

* Removed duplicate.

* Addressing PR comments.

* Adjusted reportUri property type in CSP config contract. (Azure#17947)

* Added missing body parameter description for content type resource. (Azure#18036)

* Igo/msal client version (Azure#17866)

* Added clientLibrary property to IdentityProvider

* fixed length for clientLibrary property

* Model validation fixes

* moved changes for clientLibrary property to the right spec file

* Update readme.md

Co-authored-by: Milan Zolota <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Kacie <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Kacie Kang <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Alexander Zaslonov <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Igor O <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Yuchao Yan <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants