Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Have a job that regenerates wrapped SDK automatically #13724

Closed
lmazuel opened this issue Sep 10, 2020 · 0 comments · Fixed by #17874
Closed

Have a job that regenerates wrapped SDK automatically #13724

lmazuel opened this issue Sep 10, 2020 · 0 comments · Fixed by #17874
Assignees
Labels
autorestv3 generation Client This issue points to a problem in the data-plane of the library. EngSys This issue is impacting the engineering system.
Milestone

Comments

@lmazuel
Copy link
Member

lmazuel commented Sep 10, 2020

Like done in C#, for each PR, there is a job that call autorest and regenerate the service, and fail if there is any diff. We shall try to do it as well.

@lmazuel lmazuel added Client This issue points to a problem in the data-plane of the library. EngSys This issue is impacting the engineering system. autorestv3 generation labels Sep 10, 2020
@lmazuel lmazuel added this to the MQ-2020 milestone Sep 10, 2020
@lmazuel lmazuel modified the milestones: MQ-2020, Backlog Jan 9, 2021
@seankane-msft seankane-msft self-assigned this Feb 1, 2021
openapi-sdkautomation bot pushed a commit to AzureSDKAutomation/azure-sdk-for-python that referenced this issue Apr 1, 2021
@seankane-msft seankane-msft linked a pull request Apr 13, 2021 that will close this issue
ghost pushed a commit that referenced this issue Apr 26, 2021
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 12, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
autorestv3 generation Client This issue points to a problem in the data-plane of the library. EngSys This issue is impacting the engineering system.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants