Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Upgrade analyzer version to 0.1.1-dev.20230613.1 #37037
Upgrade analyzer version to 0.1.1-dev.20230613.1 #37037
Changes from 4 commits
c5ca5b0
81d6a5d
2a88ad2
e1215ed
bf4450e
0adff3b
c07d7d1
b0bef5e
56d9071
08b896f
90a0baf
4df596e
db0cdb7
eada748
6e97987
20913a8
ced9931
42ebc54
23cd6ba
5a158ef
4a39793
d1754a8
07da049
4b1c9dc
99e18d5
e43eb1d
0b4746d
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this a breaking change to a GA library?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it is OK. See #37037 (comment)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@tg-msft, can you confirm this is an acceptable change?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Given that we're effectively replacing a runtime NullRefEx with a compile time break per https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-net/blob/main/sdk/communication/Azure.Communication.Chat/src/ChatClient.cs#L59-L95, I think we should take this.
+@glorialimicrosoft as an FYI of the change and that we might also want an
Argument.AssertNotNull(participants, nameof(participants))
here (which isn't considered breaking to add either).