Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature/communication calling server preview #18462

Conversation

zihzhan-msft
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@zihzhan-msft zihzhan-msft requested a review from cochi2 November 1, 2021 18:12
@zihzhan-msft zihzhan-msft requested review from satyakonmsft and removed request for bterlson, xirzec and ramya-rao-a November 1, 2021 18:13
@azure-sdk
Copy link
Collaborator

API changes have been detected in @azure/communication-identity. You can review API changes here

API changes

+     exchangeTeamsToken(teamsToken: string, options?: OperationOptions): Promise<CommunicationAccessToken>;
-     getTokenForTeamsUser(teamsUserAadToken: string, options?: OperationOptions): Promise<CommunicationAccessToken>;

Comment on lines 43 to 46
download_content(
contentUri: string,
options?: OperationOptions
): Promise<ContentDownloadResponse>;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why is this duplication needed?

/**
* The ContentDownloader interface represents related APIs.
*/
export interface ContentDownloader {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could you please share why the interface is needed?

@zihzhan-msft zihzhan-msft force-pushed the feature/communication-CallingServer-preview branch from cc7e95c to dd31b42 Compare November 3, 2021 08:13
@zihzhan-msft zihzhan-msft merged commit 008b3be into Azure:feature/communication-CallingServer-preview Nov 3, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants