-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Api Consistency Review feedback #17873
Merged
KarishmaGhiya
merged 14 commits into
Azure:main
from
KarishmaGhiya:api-feedback-monitor
Sep 29, 2021
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
14 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
8926fb8
update constants
KarishmaGhiya b6be064
update api review
KarishmaGhiya dc4b748
switch default end point
KarishmaGhiya 878ed60
update acc to review
KarishmaGhiya 8ed823b
add audience
KarishmaGhiya e0d43cf
remove values of audience
KarishmaGhiya bdf7b27
make audience just a string
KarishmaGhiya bb8aa98
update LogsErrorInfo object
KarishmaGhiya 6a0971d
api review
KarishmaGhiya 6afc0f7
fixed the listNamespace return list type
KarishmaGhiya ce89875
update API review
KarishmaGhiya b5fee3a
remove formatScope
KarishmaGhiya 011e6a1
update refdocs
KarishmaGhiya d077ea0
updated API with refdocs
KarishmaGhiya File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
technically don't we only need
code
here?Error
is defined as:I don't feel too strongly about this as redeclaring the properties isn't hurting anything, but I wanted to point it out
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also is
stack
something that's defined internally? I am not assigning any values tostack
though. Should we push the entire error object returned by the service into the stack?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I removed the
message
propertyThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
When you instantiate an error, stack will be defined on it. So if you push
BatchError
onto your failed results, each one should have astack
property.