Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[App Config]Move the App Config package to use core-rest-pipeline #15809

Closed
sarangan12 opened this issue Jun 17, 2021 · 1 comment · Fixed by #20766
Closed

[App Config]Move the App Config package to use core-rest-pipeline #15809

sarangan12 opened this issue Jun 17, 2021 · 1 comment · Fixed by #20766
Assignees
Labels
App Configuration Azure.ApplicationModel.Configuration Client This issue points to a problem in the data-plane of the library.
Milestone

Comments

@sarangan12
Copy link
Member

Please find the details provided in #15594

@ghost ghost added the needs-triage Workflow: This is a new issue that needs to be triaged to the appropriate team. label Jun 17, 2021
@ramya-rao-a ramya-rao-a added the Client This issue points to a problem in the data-plane of the library. label Jun 17, 2021
@ghost ghost removed the needs-triage Workflow: This is a new issue that needs to be triaged to the appropriate team. label Jun 17, 2021
@ramya-rao-a ramya-rao-a added the App Configuration Azure.ApplicationModel.Configuration label Jul 26, 2021
@ramya-rao-a ramya-rao-a added this to the [2021] December milestone Jul 26, 2021
@sadasant
Copy link
Contributor

@HarshaNalluru During this migration, it should be possible to re-use core-rest-pipeline’s new retry code. See the following comment: #6484 (comment)

It’s possible we might benefit from exporting some of the retry strategies. I didn’t preemptively exported them, but App Config could be the reason to export them.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
App Configuration Azure.ApplicationModel.Configuration Client This issue points to a problem in the data-plane of the library.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants