Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Ready for review] Dns Zone fluent implementation #1262

Merged
merged 28 commits into from
Nov 11, 2016
Merged

[Ready for review] Dns Zone fluent implementation #1262

merged 28 commits into from
Nov 11, 2016

Conversation

anuchandy
Copy link
Member

@anuchandy anuchandy commented Nov 5, 2016

Includes base types discussed here #1263

RecordSet has a property metadata which looks similar to tags, in fluent layer as well we will be using the name metadata. Reason: Tags have specific functionality in ARM which is not supported on record sets. Hence decision not to use the word ‘tags’.

@anuchandy anuchandy changed the title [Testing in Progress] Dns Zone fluent implementation Dns Zone fluent implementation Nov 7, 2016
@anuchandy anuchandy added this to the 1.0.0-beta4 milestone Nov 8, 2016
@anuchandy anuchandy changed the title Dns Zone fluent implementation [Ready for review] Dns Zone fluent implementation Nov 8, 2016
@martinsawicki martinsawicki merged commit bbc94d8 into Azure:master Nov 11, 2016
@anuchandy anuchandy deleted the dns-fluent-2 branch February 8, 2017 23:47
jianghaolu pushed a commit to jianghaolu/azure-sdk-for-java that referenced this pull request Feb 27, 2017
[Ready for review] Dns Zone fluent implementation
jianghaolu pushed a commit to jianghaolu/azure-sdk-for-java that referenced this pull request Feb 27, 2017
[Ready for review] Dns Zone fluent implementation
sima-zhu pushed a commit to sima-zhu/azure-sdk-for-java that referenced this pull request Mar 21, 2019
…ype (Azure#1262)

Throw  error if return type for pageable operation doesn't contain a collection.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants