Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Separate ListingByTag into group & subscription level #1202

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 19, 2016

Conversation

jianghaolu
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

@anudeepsharma anudeepsharma left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approving with changes.

if (tagName == null) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException("tagName == null");
}
String odataFilter;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As you are splitting the code for listing at subscription and at resource group, I assume generating ODataFilter is common code at both locations. If that is the case can you create a utility to create the ODataFilter string.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

✔️

@martinsawicki martinsawicki merged commit 72c88a7 into Azure:master Oct 19, 2016
jianghaolu pushed a commit to jianghaolu/azure-sdk-for-java that referenced this pull request Feb 27, 2017
Separate ListingByTag into group & subscription level
sima-zhu pushed a commit to sima-zhu/azure-sdk-for-java that referenced this pull request Mar 21, 2019
* Added a check to make sure the property.documentation doesn't already start with Gets before appending it as a prefix

* Regenerated CSharp tests
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants