Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[AzureSearch] remove skillset count entirely for now #9968

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 26, 2020

Conversation

jadrefke
Copy link
Contributor

MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.

Contribution checklist:

If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.

ARM API Review Checklist

  • Service team MUST add the "WaitForARMFeedback" label if the management plane API changes fall into one of the below categories.
    • adding/removing APIs.
    • adding/removing properties.
    • adding/removing API-version.
    • adding a new service in Azure.

Failure to comply may result in delays for manifest application. Note this does not apply to data plane APIs.

  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged urgently, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.
    Please follow the link to find more details on API review process.

@openapi-pipeline-app
Copy link

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Jun 25, 2020

[Staging] Swagger Validation Report

BreakingChange: 2 Errors, 0 Warnings [Detail] [Expand]
Rule Message
1033 - RemovedProperty The new version is missing a property found in the old version. Was 'skillsetCount' renamed or removed?
New: Azure.Search/preview/2020-06-30/searchservice.json#L8461:7
Old: Azure.Search/preview/2020-06-30/searchservice.json#L8461:7
1033 - RemovedProperty The new version is missing a property found in the old version. Was 'skillsetCount' renamed or removed?
New: Azure.Search/preview/2020-06-30/searchservice.json#L8461:7
Old: Azure.Search/preview/2020-06-30/searchservice.json#L8461:7
️✔️LintDiff [Detail]
 Validation passes for LintDiff. 
️✔️Avocado [Detail]
 Validation passes for Avocado. 
Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@azuresdkci
Copy link
Contributor

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@openapi-sdkautomation
Copy link

openapi-sdkautomation bot commented Jun 25, 2020

Azure CLI Extension Generation - Release

No readme.md specification configuration files were found that are associated with the files modified in this pull request, or swagger_to_sdk section in readme.md is not configured

@openapi-sdkautomation
Copy link

openapi-sdkautomation bot commented Jun 25, 2020

azure-sdk-for-go - Release

No readme.md specification configuration files were found that are associated with the files modified in this pull request, or swagger_to_sdk section in readme.md is not configured

@openapi-sdkautomation
Copy link

openapi-sdkautomation bot commented Jun 25, 2020

azure-sdk-for-python - Release

No readme.md specification configuration files were found that are associated with the files modified in this pull request, or swagger_to_sdk section in readme.md is not configured

@openapi-sdkautomation
Copy link

openapi-sdkautomation bot commented Jun 25, 2020

azure-sdk-for-js - Release

No readme.md specification configuration files were found that are associated with the files modified in this pull request, or swagger_to_sdk section in readme.md is not configured

@openapi-sdkautomation
Copy link

openapi-sdkautomation bot commented Jun 25, 2020

azure-sdk-for-java - Release

No readme.md specification configuration files were found that are associated with the files modified in this pull request, or swagger_to_sdk section in readme.md is not configured

@openapi-sdkautomation
Copy link

openapi-sdkautomation bot commented Jun 25, 2020

azure-sdk-for-net - Release

No readme.md specification configuration files were found that are associated with the files modified in this pull request, or swagger_to_sdk section in readme.md is not configured

@openapi-sdkautomation
Copy link

openapi-sdkautomation bot commented Jun 25, 2020

Trenton Generation - Release

No readme.md specification configuration files were found that are associated with the files modified in this pull request, or swagger_to_sdk section in readme.md is not configured

@mayurid mayurid merged commit 0bc7853 into Azure:master Jun 26, 2020
@openapi-sdkautomation
Copy link

openapi-sdkautomation bot commented Jun 26, 2020

azure-sdk-for-python-track2 - Release

No readme.md specification configuration files were found that are associated with the files modified in this pull request, or swagger_to_sdk section in readme.md is not configured

heaths added a commit to heaths/azure-sdk-for-net that referenced this pull request Jun 26, 2020
Required change after Azure/azure-rest-api-specs#9968. The live test was failing because we *sometimes* exhausted our free allocation of text translations.
heaths added a commit to Azure/azure-sdk-for-net that referenced this pull request Jun 26, 2020
* Change Search version to use 2020-06-30

Fixes #10873 to use a fixed version of the latest swaggers for Search.

* Update models and fix live tests

Required change after Azure/azure-rest-api-specs#9968. The live test was failing because we *sometimes* exhausted our free allocation of text translations.
prmathur-microsoft pushed a commit to Azure/azure-sdk-for-net that referenced this pull request Jul 8, 2020
* Change Search version to use 2020-06-30

Fixes #10873 to use a fixed version of the latest swaggers for Search.

* Update models and fix live tests

Required change after Azure/azure-rest-api-specs#9968. The live test was failing because we *sometimes* exhausted our free allocation of text translations.
00Kai0 pushed a commit to 00Kai0/azure-rest-api-specs that referenced this pull request Oct 12, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants