Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Hub Generated] Review request for Microsoft.Resources to add version stable/2019-11-01 #7839

Merged

Conversation

ezgambac
Copy link
Contributor

@ezgambac ezgambac commented Nov 25, 2019

If you are a MSFT employee you can view your work branch via this link.

Contribution checklist:

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Nov 25, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-python

Nothing to generate for azure-sdk-for-python

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Nov 25, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-go

Nothing to generate for azure-sdk-for-go

"type": "string",
"description": "The physical location of the Azure location."
},
"pairedRegion": {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

readonly?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Well, this data shouldn't be modified.

],
"x-ms-enum": {
"name": "SubscriptionState",
"modelAsString": false
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why modelAsString false? it will cause breaking change in SDK for future updating

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That is how it was from the api-version I copied, I think it hasn't been updated since (2019-06-01)

@yungezz yungezz added the WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required label Nov 28, 2019
Copy link
Contributor

@KrisBash KrisBash left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM thanks.

@KrisBash KrisBash added ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review and removed WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required labels Dec 3, 2019
@yungezz
Copy link
Member

yungezz commented Dec 4, 2019

hi @ezgambac is this PR ready to merge? could you pls fix prettiercheck by following instruction at https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs/blob/master/documentation/ci-fix.md#prettier-check?

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@openapi-sdkautomation
Copy link

openapi-sdkautomation bot commented Dec 5, 2019

azure-sdk-for-go - Release

Pending...

@openapi-sdkautomation
Copy link

openapi-sdkautomation bot commented Dec 5, 2019

azure-sdk-for-java - Release

Pending...

@openapi-sdkautomation
Copy link

openapi-sdkautomation bot commented Dec 5, 2019

azure-sdk-for-js - Release

Pending...

@openapi-sdkautomation
Copy link

openapi-sdkautomation bot commented Dec 5, 2019

azure-sdk-for-net - Release

Pending...

@ezgambac
Copy link
Contributor Author

ezgambac commented Dec 5, 2019

@yungezz Fixed the prettier error, this is good to go.

@openapi-sdkautomation
Copy link

openapi-sdkautomation bot commented Dec 5, 2019

azure-sdk-for-python - Release

Pending...

This was referenced Dec 5, 2019
@yungezz yungezz merged commit 26bef52 into Azure:master Dec 10, 2019
TalluriAnusha pushed a commit to AsrOneSdk/azure-rest-api-specs that referenced this pull request Dec 11, 2019
Comment on lines +68 to +70
```yaml $(tag) == 'package-2019-11'
input-file:
- Microsoft.Resources/stable/2019-11-01/subscriptions.json
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Isn't this against the convention? Shouldn't it be package-subscriptions-2019-11?

Comment on lines 59 to +60
``` yaml $(package-deploymentscripts)
tag: package-deploymentscripts-2019-10-preview
tag: package-2019-11
Copy link
Member

@jiasli jiasli Feb 25, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't these two lines match? In this case, it is package-deploymentscripts -> package-2019-11 -> Microsoft.Resources/stable/2019-11-01/subscriptions.json which isn't a correct mapping.

nschonni added a commit to nschonni/azure-rest-api-specs that referenced this pull request Jan 26, 2021
Randomly removed in Azure#7839
Adjusted paths for Azure/autorest repo reorg
PhoenixHe-NV pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 22, 2021
Randomly removed in #7839
Adjusted paths for Azure/autorest repo reorg
mkarmark pushed a commit to mkarmark/azure-rest-api-specs that referenced this pull request Jul 21, 2021
Randomly removed in Azure#7839
Adjusted paths for Azure/autorest repo reorg
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants