Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Databox stable/2019-09-01 API Version #7317

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 27, 2019
Merged

Databox stable/2019-09-01 API Version #7317

merged 2 commits into from
Sep 27, 2019

Conversation

sashanm
Copy link
Contributor

@sashanm sashanm commented Sep 25, 2019

Latest improvements:

MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.

Contribution checklist:

  • I have reviewed the documentation for the workflow.
  • Validation tools were run on swagger spec(s) and have all been fixed in this PR.
  • The OpenAPI Hub was used for checking validation status and next steps.

ARM API Review Checklist

  • Service team MUST add the "WaitForARMFeedback" label if the management plane API changes fall into one of the below categories.
  • adding/removing APIs.
  • adding/removing properties.
  • adding/removing API-version.
  • adding a new service in Azure.

Failure to comply may result in delays for manifest application. Note this does not apply to data plane APIs.

  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged urgently, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.
    Please follow the link to find more details on API review process.

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Sep 25, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-python

The initial PR has been merged into your service PR:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-python#7459

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Sep 25, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-go

The initial PR has been merged into your service PR:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-go#5901

@azuresdkci
Copy link
Contributor

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

"values": [
{
"value": "NotStarted",
"description": "Data copy hasnt started yet."
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
"description": "Data copy hasnt started yet."
"description": "Data copy hasn't started yet."

"properties": {
"expectedDataSizeInTeraBytes": {
"format": "int32",
"description": "The expected size of the data, which needs to be transfered in this job, in tera bytes.",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
"description": "The expected size of the data, which needs to be transfered in this job, in tera bytes.",
"description": "The expected size of the data, which needs to be transferred in this job, in terabytes.",

}
],
"properties": {
"expectedDataSizeInTeraBytes": {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
"expectedDataSizeInTeraBytes": {
"expectedDataSizeInTerabytes": {

"properties": {
"expectedDataSizeInTeraBytes": {
"format": "int32",
"description": "The expected size of the data, which needs to be transfered in this job, in tera bytes.",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
"description": "The expected size of the data, which needs to be transfered in this job, in tera bytes.",
"description": "The expected size of the data, which needs to be transferred in this job, in terabytes.",

],
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"expectedDataSizeInTeraBytes": {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
"expectedDataSizeInTeraBytes": {
"expectedDataSizeInTerabytes": {

"DiskScheduleAvailabilityRequest": {
"description": "Request body to get the availability for scheduling disk orders.",
"required": [
"expectedDataSizeInTeraBytes",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
"expectedDataSizeInTeraBytes",
"expectedDataSizeInTerabytes",

"readOnly": true
},
"returnPackage": {
"$ref": "#/def
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
"$ref": "#/def
"description": "Identify request and response of active job limit for SKU availability."

@michaeljqzq michaeljqzq added the WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required label Sep 26, 2019
@ravbhatnagar
Copy link
Contributor

Signing off from ARM side.

@ravbhatnagar ravbhatnagar added ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review and removed WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required labels Sep 27, 2019
@yungezz
Copy link
Member

yungezz commented Sep 27, 2019

HI @sashanm is this PR ready to merge?

@yungezz yungezz assigned yungezz and unassigned michaeljqzq Sep 27, 2019
@sashanm
Copy link
Contributor Author

sashanm commented Sep 27, 2019

@yungezz Yes. It is ready to merge

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants