Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Panwang/taskruns #7123

Merged
merged 29 commits into from
Nov 20, 2019
Merged

Panwang/taskruns #7123

merged 29 commits into from
Nov 20, 2019

Conversation

pan-wang
Copy link
Contributor

@pan-wang pan-wang commented Sep 5, 2019

Latest improvements:

MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.

Contribution checklist:

  • I have reviewed the documentation for the workflow.
  • Validation tools were run on swagger spec(s) and have all been fixed in this PR.
  • The OpenAPI Hub was used for checking validation status and next steps.

ARM API Review Checklist

  • Service team MUST add the "WaitForARMFeedback" label if the management plane API changes fall into one of the below categories.
  • adding/removing APIs.
  • adding/removing properties.
  • adding/removing API-version.
  • adding a new service in Azure.

Failure to comply may result in delays for manifest application. Note this does not apply to data plane APIs.

  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged urgently, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.
    Please follow the link to find more details on API review process.

@openapi-sdkautomation
Copy link

openapi-sdkautomation bot commented Sep 5, 2019

In Testing, Please Ignore

[Logs] (Generated from d0215e3, Iteration 8)

In-Progress .NET: test-repo-billy/azure-sdk-for-net [Logs]
  • Package generation in progress.
In-Progress Python: test-repo-billy/azure-sdk-for-python [Logs]
  • Package generation in progress.
In-Progress Java: test-repo-billy/azure-sdk-for-java [Logs]
  • Package generation in progress.
In-Progress Go: test-repo-billy/azure-sdk-for-go [Logs] [Diff]
  • Package generation in progress.
In-Progress JavaScript: test-repo-billy/azure-sdk-for-js [Logs]
  • Package generation in progress.
In-Progress Ruby: test-repo-billy/azure-sdk-for-ruby [Logs]
  • Package generation in progress.

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Sep 5, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-python

A PR has been created for you:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-python#8722

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Sep 5, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-go

The initial PR has been merged into your service PR:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-go#6395

@azuresdkci
Copy link
Contributor

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@anuchandy anuchandy added the WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required label Sep 11, 2019
Copy link
Member

@anuchandy anuchandy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good from SDK side. Requested ARM review as it adds new APIs.

Copy link
Contributor

@KrisBash KrisBash left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please see comments

"type": "Microsoft.ContainerRegistry/registries/TaskRuns",
"properties": {
"provisioningState": "Creating",
"runRequest": {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As described above, the swagger spec doesn't document this schema or the other types.

@KrisBash KrisBash added the ARMChangesRequested <valid label in PR review process>add this label when require changes after ARM review label Sep 13, 2019
@yungezz
Copy link
Member

yungezz commented Oct 8, 2019

hi @pan-wang could you pls address comments ?

@pan-wang
Copy link
Contributor Author

pan-wang commented Oct 8, 2019 via email

Copy link
Member

@majastrz majastrz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@KrisBash's comments have not been addressed and are blocking approval. Please fix.

@huanwu
Copy link
Contributor

huanwu commented Nov 9, 2019

@KrisBash Could we move forward for this PR? We would like to file a separate work item to solve the debt per discussion above. And there're two Ignore Test-Only CI fail. We can just ignore, right?

@majastrz
Copy link
Member

majastrz commented Nov 9, 2019

@krishbabu Could we move forward for this PR? We would like to file a separate work item to solve the debt per discussion above. And there're two Ignore Test-Only CI fail. We can just ignore, right?

I think you meant @KrisBash. For the CI failures, @anuchandy will need to weigh as the SDK team owns these checks.

Copy link
Member

@majastrz majastrz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me. I'll leave it for @KrisBash to do the final sign off since his comments are still remaining.

Copy link
Contributor

@ravbhatnagar ravbhatnagar left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@pan-wang - one comment, please take a look. ALso some from Kris have not been addressed.

@@ -2072,6 +2491,27 @@
},
"x-ms-azure-resource": true
},
"Error": {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ravbhatnagar Just submitted a new commit to solve the problem

@ravbhatnagar
Copy link
Contributor

Signing off from ARM side.

@ravbhatnagar ravbhatnagar added ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review and removed ARMChangesRequested <valid label in PR review process>add this label when require changes after ARM review WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required labels Nov 14, 2019
@huanwu
Copy link
Contributor

huanwu commented Nov 14, 2019

@majastrz ARM signed off this change. Could you continue merge the manifest?

@huanwu
Copy link
Contributor

huanwu commented Nov 15, 2019

@anuchandy Could you merge the PR? The manifest update was blocked now.

@yungezz yungezz merged commit 65862ac into Azure:master Nov 20, 2019
TalluriAnusha pushed a commit to AsrOneSdk/azure-rest-api-specs that referenced this pull request Dec 11, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants