Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: databox model validation errors #6834

Merged

Conversation

nschonni
Copy link
Contributor

@nschonni nschonni commented Aug 1, 2019

Remove empty body for RESPONSE_SCHEMA_NOT_IN_SPEC errors

@openapi-sdkautomation
Copy link

openapi-sdkautomation bot commented Aug 1, 2019

In Testing, Please Ignore

[Logs] (Generated from 48d0804, Iteration 2)

Warning Python: test-repo-billy/azure-sdk-for-python [Logs] [Diff]
  • No packages generated.
Warning JavaScript: test-repo-billy/azure-sdk-for-js [Logs] [Diff]
  • Warning @azure/arm-databox [Logs]
Warning Go: test-repo-billy/azure-sdk-for-go [Logs] [Diff]
  • Warning databox/mgmt/2018-01-01 [Logs]
Warning Java: test-repo-billy/azure-sdk-for-java [Logs] [Diff]
  • Warning azure-mgmt-databox [Logs]
Warning Ruby: test-repo-billy/azure-sdk-for-ruby [Logs] [Diff]
  • No packages generated.

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Aug 1, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-go

Unable to detect any generation context from this PR.

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Aug 1, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-python

Unable to detect any generation context from this PR.

@azuresdkci
Copy link
Contributor

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

Remove empty body for RESPONSE_SCHEMA_NOT_IN_SPEC errors
@nschonni nschonni force-pushed the fix--databox-model-validation-errors branch from 2f58a65 to 48d0804 Compare August 1, 2019 21:19
@lirenhe lirenhe merged commit a41ded4 into Azure:master Aug 2, 2019
@nschonni nschonni deleted the fix--databox-model-validation-errors branch August 3, 2019 01:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants