Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Batch model validation errors #6753

Merged

Conversation

nschonni
Copy link
Contributor

  • Add body for RESPONSE_BODY_NOT_IN_EXAMPLE errors
  • active -> Active for state enum in 2017-09-01 examples

- Add body for RESPONSE_BODY_NOT_IN_EXAMPLE errors
- active -> Active for state enum in 2017-09-01 examples
@openapi-sdkautomation
Copy link

openapi-sdkautomation bot commented Jul 28, 2019

SDK Automation [Logs] (Generated from 7e0f540, Iteration 1)

Succeeded Python: Azure/azure-sdk-for-python [Logs] [Diff]
Succeeded Java: Azure/azure-sdk-for-java [Logs] [Diff]
Warning Go: test-repo-billy/azure-sdk-for-go [Logs] [Diff]
  • Warning batch/mgmt/2015-12-01 [Logs]
  • Warning batch/mgmt/2017-01-01 [Logs]
  • Warning batch/mgmt/2017-05-01 [Logs]
  • Warning batch/mgmt/2017-09-01 [Logs]
  • Warning batch/mgmt/2018-12-01 [Logs]
  • Warning batch/mgmt/2019-04-01 [Logs]
Succeeded JavaScript: Azure/azure-sdk-for-js [Logs] [Diff]
Succeeded Ruby: Azure/azure-sdk-for-ruby [Logs] [Diff]

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Jul 28, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-go

Unable to detect any generation context from this PR.

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Jul 28, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-python

Unable to detect any generation context from this PR.

@azuresdkci
Copy link
Contributor

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@michaeljqzq michaeljqzq merged commit bc9c454 into Azure:master Jul 29, 2019
@nschonni nschonni deleted the fix--Batch-model-validation-errors branch July 29, 2019 02:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants