Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Swagger update for Azure Active Directory Integration for Azure Database for Postgres and MySQL #6701

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Oct 8, 2019

Conversation

shinilm
Copy link
Contributor

@shinilm shinilm commented Jul 22, 2019

Latest improvements:

MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.

Contribution checklist:

  • I have reviewed the documentation for the workflow.
  • Validation tools were run on swagger spec(s) and have all been fixed in this PR.
  • The OpenAPI Hub was used for checking validation status and next steps.

ARM API Review Checklist

  • Service team MUST add the "WaitForARMFeedback" label if the management plane API changes fall into one of the below categories.
  • adding/removing APIs.
  • adding/removing properties.
  • adding/removing API-version.
  • adding a new service in Azure.

Failure to comply may result in delays for manifest application. Note this does not apply to data plane APIs.

  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged urgently, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.
    Please follow the link to find more details on API review process.

@openapi-sdkautomation
Copy link

openapi-sdkautomation bot commented Jul 22, 2019

In Testing, Please Ignore

[Logs] (Generated from 1fb6d8b, Iteration 11)

Succeeded .NET: test-repo-billy/azure-sdk-for-net [Logs] [Diff]
Succeeded Python: test-repo-billy/azure-sdk-for-python [Logs] [Diff]
Failed Java: test-repo-billy/azure-sdk-for-java [Logs] [Diff]
Warning Go: test-repo-billy/azure-sdk-for-go [Logs] [Diff]
Warning JavaScript: test-repo-billy/azure-sdk-for-js [Logs] [Diff]
  • Warning @azure/arm-postgresql [Logs]

@msftclas
Copy link

msftclas commented Jul 22, 2019

CLA assistant check
All CLA requirements met.

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Jul 22, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-python

A PR has been created for you:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-python#7700

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Jul 22, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-go

A PR has been created for you:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-go#5321

@azuresdkci
Copy link
Contributor

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@jhendrixMSFT
Copy link
Member

@shinilm can you please sign the CLA?

@jhendrixMSFT
Copy link
Member

Also looks like two new ARM errors have been introduced which will need to be fixed.

| R2062 - XmsResourceInPutResponse |  
| The 200 response model for an ARM PUT operation must have x-ms-azure-resource extension set to true in its hierarchy. Operation: 'ServerAdministrators_CreateOrUpdate' Model: 'ServerAdministratorResource'. |  
| at specification/postgresql/resource-manager/Microsoft.DBforPostgreSQL/stable/2017-12-01/postgresql.json:1108 |  
|   |  
| R2020 - RequiredPropertiesMissingInResourceModel |  
| Model definition 'ServerAdministratorResource' must have the properties 'name', 'id' and 'type' in its hierarchy and these properties must be marked as readonly. |  
| at specification/postgresql/resource-manager/Microsoft.DBforPostgreSQL/stable/2017-12-01/postgresql.json:2422

@shinilm shinilm changed the title Swagger update to include Azure Active Directory Api for PG and MySQL Swagger update for Azure Active Directory Integration for Azure Database for Postgres and MySQL Jul 24, 2019
@shinilm
Copy link
Contributor Author

shinilm commented Jul 24, 2019

@jhendrixMSFT, Thanks for the review and I have addressed the same

@jhendrixMSFT
Copy link
Member

Can you please also fix the model validation failures listed here. Looks like the example files need a small fix.

@jhendrixMSFT
Copy link
Member

Thanks. This looks good from SDK perspective, waiting for ARM to sign off.

@jhendrixMSFT
Copy link
Member

@sanjaiganesh could somebody from ARM please review?

Copy link
Contributor

@KrisBash KrisBash left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please see comments

@KrisBash KrisBash added the ARMChangesRequested <valid label in PR review process>add this label when require changes after ARM review label Sep 6, 2019
@ravbhatnagar ravbhatnagar added ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review and removed ARMChangesRequested <valid label in PR review process>add this label when require changes after ARM review WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required labels Sep 24, 2019
@yungezz
Copy link
Member

yungezz commented Sep 26, 2019

hi @shinilm is this PR ready to merge?

@shinilm
Copy link
Contributor Author

shinilm commented Sep 26, 2019 via email

@yungezz
Copy link
Member

yungezz commented Sep 27, 2019

approve since ARM signed off. hi @jhendrixMSFT could you pls approve and merge? I cannot merge it.

@jhendrixMSFT
Copy link
Member

@shinilm is this functionality live?

@jhendrixMSFT
Copy link
Member

@yungezz can yo confirm the functionality is live?

@shinilm
Copy link
Contributor Author

shinilm commented Oct 8, 2019

hi @shinilm is this PR ready to merge?

hi @shinilm is this PR ready to merge?

Yes this is live

@shinilm
Copy link
Contributor Author

shinilm commented Oct 8, 2019

hi @shinilm is this PR ready to merge?

Yes this is ready to merge

@jhendrixMSFT jhendrixMSFT merged commit 6c4166f into Azure:master Oct 8, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants