-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Hub Generated] Review request for Microsoft.ContainerService/aks to add version preview/2023-08-02-preview #25891
[Hub Generated] Review request for Microsoft.ContainerService/aks to add version preview/2023-08-02-preview #25891
Conversation
…eview/2023-07-02-preview to version 2023-08-02-preview
* add netorkPolicy "none" value and description * add "none" enum value to networkPolicy
* Update trusted access put and delete to async operation * Update example * Update header
* Add AzureServiceMesh example * Fix AKV resource id format
Next Steps to Merge✔️ All automated merging requirements have been met! Refer to step 4 in the PR workflow diagram (even if your PR is for data plane, not ARM). |
Swagger Validation Report
|
compared swaggers (via Oad v0.10.4)] | new version | base version |
---|---|---|
managedClusters.json | 2023-08-02-preview(8c7124a) | 2023-08-01(main) |
managedClusters.json | 2023-08-02-preview(8c7124a) | 2023-07-02-preview(main) |
The following breaking changes are detected by comparison with the latest stable version:
The following breaking changes are detected by comparison with the latest preview version:
️️✔️
CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There is no credential detected.
️⚠️
LintDiff: 1 Warnings warning [Detail]
compared tags (via openapi-validator v2.1.4) | new version | base version |
---|---|---|
package-preview-2023-08 | package-preview-2023-08(8c7124a) | default(main) |
[must fix]The following errors/warnings are introduced by current PR:
Rule | Message | Related RPC [For API reviewers] |
---|---|---|
The response of operation:'Machines_Get' is defined without 'systemData'. Consider adding the systemData to the response. Location: aks/preview/2023-08-02-preview/managedClusters.json#L1388 |
The following errors/warnings exist before current PR submission:
Rule | Message |
---|---|
PrivateEndpointResourceSchemaValidation |
The private endpoint model 'PrivateLinkResourcesListResult' schema does not conform to the common type definition. Location: aks/preview/2023-08-02-preview/managedClusters.json#L2156 |
Based on the response model schema, operation 'ManagedClusters_ListKubernetesVersions' might be pageable. Consider adding the x-ms-pageable extension. Location: aks/preview/2023-08-02-preview/managedClusters.json#L116 |
|
OperationId should contain the verb: 'listcredential' in:'ManagedClusters_GetAccessProfile'. Consider updating the operationId Location: aks/preview/2023-08-02-preview/managedClusters.json#L284 |
|
Do not have duplicate name of x-ms-example, make sure every x-ms-example name unique. Duplicate x-ms-example: Get Managed Cluster Location: aks/preview/2023-08-02-preview/managedClusters.json#L367 |
|
Do not have duplicate name of x-ms-example, make sure every x-ms-example name unique. Duplicate x-ms-example: Get Managed Cluster Location: aks/preview/2023-08-02-preview/managedClusters.json#L415 |
|
Do not have duplicate name of x-ms-example, make sure every x-ms-example name unique. Duplicate x-ms-example: Get Managed Cluster Location: aks/preview/2023-08-02-preview/managedClusters.json#L460 |
|
Do not have duplicate name of x-ms-example, make sure every x-ms-example name unique. Duplicate x-ms-example: Get Managed Cluster Location: aks/preview/2023-08-02-preview/managedClusters.json#L502 |
|
The response of operation:'AgentPools_Get' is defined without 'systemData'. Consider adding the systemData to the response. Location: aks/preview/2023-08-02-preview/managedClusters.json#L1075 |
|
The response of operation:'AgentPools_CreateOrUpdate' is defined without 'systemData'. Consider adding the systemData to the response. Location: aks/preview/2023-08-02-preview/managedClusters.json#L1118 |
|
Based on the response model schema, operation 'PrivateEndpointConnections_List' might be pageable. Consider adding the x-ms-pageable extension. Location: aks/preview/2023-08-02-preview/managedClusters.json#L1872 |
|
The response of operation:'PrivateEndpointConnections_Get' is defined without 'systemData'. Consider adding the systemData to the response. Location: aks/preview/2023-08-02-preview/managedClusters.json#L1915 |
|
The response of operation:'PrivateEndpointConnections_Update' is defined without 'systemData'. Consider adding the systemData to the response. Location: aks/preview/2023-08-02-preview/managedClusters.json#L1963 |
|
Based on the response model schema, operation 'PrivateLinkResources_List' might be pageable. Consider adding the x-ms-pageable extension. Location: aks/preview/2023-08-02-preview/managedClusters.json#L2134 |
|
OperationId should contain the verb: 'resolveprivatelinkserviceid' in:'ResolvePrivateLinkServiceId_POST'. Consider updating the operationId Location: aks/preview/2023-08-02-preview/managedClusters.json#L2181 |
️️✔️
Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Avocado.
️️✔️
SwaggerAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
️️✔️
TypeSpecAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
️️✔️
ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for ModelValidation.
️️✔️
SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
️️✔️
PoliCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passed for PoliCheck.
️️✔️
PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for PrettierCheck.
️️✔️
SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SpellCheck.
️️✔️
Lint(RPaaS) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Lint(RPaaS).
️️✔️
PR Summary succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Summary.
️️✔️
Automated merging requirements met succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Swagger Generation Artifacts
|
Generated ApiView
|
Please address or respond to feedback from the ARM API reviewer. |
Hey @JeffreyRichter, could you please help review and approve this breaking change? For the failed CI Breaking Change(Cross-Version), it's comparing this preview API version 2023-08-02-preview with latest stable API version 2023-08-01
When comparing with the previous preview API version 2023-07-02-preview, the comparison results only have the following warnings |
@msyyc could you please help approve the SDK breaking change for Python? Similar to the breaking change alert in the recently added stable API version 2023-08-01, the warning on As for the warning about the two operations of trusted access role binding, feature owner updated them from the original sync operation to LRO in this API version by commit #1a596e6 (PR #25537). |
/pr RequestMerge |
Swagger pipeline restarted successfully, please wait for status update in this comment. |
…add version preview/2023-08-02-preview (#25891) * Adds base for updating Microsoft.ContainerService/aks from version preview/2023-07-02-preview to version 2023-08-02-preview * Updates readme * Updates API version in new specs and examples * update (#25469) * Fix the IstioComponents structure (#25492) * add netorkPolicy "none" (#25511) * add netorkPolicy "none" value and description * add "none" enum value to networkPolicy * add addon autoscaling api (#25479) * Update trusted access put and delete to async operation (#25537) * Update trusted access put and delete to async operation * Update example * Update header * Swagger changes for adding autoscalerprofile flags for daemonset/multipleexpander (#25487) * Adding json changes * adding "daemonsets" to the custom-words * Editing "Expander" to "expander" * Removing daemonset custom word from this pr. look at: #25533 * Add AzureServiceMesh example (#25560) * Add AzureServiceMesh example * Fix AKV resource id format * enrich ASM examples (#25598) --------- Co-authored-by: deveshdama <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: robogatikov <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Chih-Sheng Huang <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Tongyao Si <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Youn Jae Kim <[email protected]>
This is a PR generated at OpenAPI Hub. You can view your work branch via this link.
ARM (Control Plane) API Specification Update Pull Request
PR review workflow diagram
Please understand this diagram before proceeding. It explains how to get your PR approved & merged.
[1] ARM review queue (for merge queues, see [4])
The PRs are processed by time opened, ascending. Your PR may show up on 2nd or later page.
If you addressed Step 1 from the diagram and your PR is not showing up in the queue, ensure the label
ARMChangesRequested
is removed from your PR. This should cause the label
WaitForARMFeedback
to be added.[2] https://aka.ms/azsdk/support/specreview-channel
[3] List of SDK breaking changes approvers in pinned Teams announcement
[4] public repo merge queue, private repo merge queue (for ARM review queue, [1])
If you need further help with anything, see
Getting help
section below.Purpose of this PR
What's the purpose of this PR? Check all that apply. This is mandatory!
Due diligence checklist
To merge this PR, you must go through the following checklist and confirm you understood
and followed the instructions by checking all the boxes:
ARM resource provider contract and
REST guidelines (estimated time: 4 hours).
I understand this is required before I can proceed to Step 2, "ARM Review", for this PR.
Breaking changes review (Step 1)
you must follow the breaking changes process.
IMPORTANT This applies even if:
Such claims must be reviewed, and the process is the same.
ARM API changes review (Step 2)
ARMReview
label.Viewing API changes
For convenient view of the API changes made by this PR, refer to the URLs provided in the table
in the
Generated ApiView
comment added to this PR. You can use ApiView to show API versions diff.Suppressing failures
If one or multiple validation error/warning suppression(s) is detected in your PR, please follow the
Swagger-Suppression-Process
to get approval.
Getting help
and https://aka.ms/ci-fix.