Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Microsoft.KeyVault 2023-07-01 Add changes for Trusted Access Mode #23813

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Oct 12, 2023
Merged

Microsoft.KeyVault 2023-07-01 Add changes for Trusted Access Mode #23813

merged 10 commits into from
Oct 12, 2023

Conversation

fssevero
Copy link
Contributor

@fssevero fssevero commented May 4, 2023

ARM API Information (Control Plane)

MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.

Azure 1st Party Service can try out the Shift Left experience to initiate API design review from ADO code repo. If you are interested, may request engineering support by filling in with the form https://aka.ms/ShiftLeftSupportForm.

Changelog

Add a changelog entry for this PR by answering the following questions:

  1. What's the purpose of the update?
    • new service onboarding
    • new API version
    • update existing version for new feature
    • update existing version to fix swagger quality issue in s360
    • Other, please clarify
  2. When are you targeting to deploy the new service/feature to public regions? Please provide the date or, if the date is not yet available, the month.
    • July
  3. When do you expect to publish the swagger? Please provide date or, the the date is not yet available, the month.
    • July
  4. By default, Azure SDKs of all languages (.NET/Python/Java/JavaScript for both management-plane SDK and data-plane SDK, Go for management-plane SDK only ) MUST be refreshed with/after swagger of new version is published. If you prefer NOT to refresh any specific SDK language upon swagger updates in the current PR, please leave details with justification here.

Contribution checklist (MS Employees Only):

If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.

ARM API Review Checklist

Applicability: ⚠️

If your changes encompass only the following scenarios, you should SKIP this section, as these scenarios do not require ARM review.

  • Change to data plane APIs
  • Adding new properties
  • All removals

Otherwise your PR may be subject to ARM review requirements. Complete the following:

  • Check this box if any of the following apply to the PR so that the label "ARMReview" and "WaitForARMFeedback" will be added by bot to kick off ARM API Review. Missing to check this box in the following scenario may result in delays to the ARM manifest review and deployment.

    • Adding a new service
    • Adding new API(s)
    • Adding a new API version
      -[X] To review changes efficiently, ensure you copy the existing version into the new directory structure for first commit and then push new changes, including version updates, in separate commits. You can use OpenAPIHub to initialize the PR for adding a new version. For more details refer to the wiki.

  • Ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.

  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.

Breaking Change Review Checklist

If you have any breaking changes as defined in the Breaking Change Policy, request approval from the Breaking Change Review Board.

Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Additional details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking Change Wiki.

NOTE: To update API(s) in public preview for over 1 year (refer to Retirement of Previews)

Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.

@fssevero fssevero added the DoNotMerge <valid label in PR review process> use to hold merge after approval label May 4, 2023
@fssevero fssevero requested review from heaths and jlichwa as code owners May 4, 2023 10:20
@openapi-workflow-bot
Copy link

Hi, @fssevero Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips.

  • Please ensure to do self-check against checklists in first PR comment.
  • PR assignee is the person auto-assigned and responsible for your current PR reviewing and merging.
  • For specs comparison cross API versions, Use API Specs Comparison Report Generator
  • If there is CI failure(s), to fix CI error(s) is mandatory for PR merging; or you need to provide justification in PR comment for explanation. How to fix?

    • Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. [email protected]

    @openapi-workflow-bot openapi-workflow-bot bot added ARMReview WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required labels May 4, 2023
    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    Hi, @fssevero your PR are labelled with WaitForARMFeedback. A notification email will be sent out shortly afterwards to notify ARM review board([email protected]).

    @ghost ghost added the KeyVault label May 4, 2023
    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented May 4, 2023 •
    edited
    Loading

    Swagger Validation Report

    ️️✔️BreakingChange succeeded [Detail] [Expand] 
    There are no breaking changes.
    ️⚠️Breaking Change(Cross-Version): 3 Warnings warning [Detail]
    compared swaggers (via Oad v0.10.4)] new version base version
    common.json 2023-07-01(0ac12df) 2023-02-01(main)
    common.json 2023-07-01(0ac12df) 2022-02-01-preview(main)
    keys.json 2023-07-01(0ac12df) 2023-02-01(main)
    keys.json 2023-07-01(0ac12df) 2022-02-01-preview(main)
    keysManagedHsm.json 2023-07-01(0ac12df) 2023-02-01(main)
    keyvault.json 2023-07-01(0ac12df) 2023-02-01(main)
    keyvault.json 2023-07-01(0ac12df) 2022-02-01-preview(main)
    managedHsm.json 2023-07-01(0ac12df) 2023-02-01(main)
    managedHsm.json 2023-07-01(0ac12df) 2022-02-01-preview(main)
    providers.json 2023-07-01(0ac12df) 2023-02-01(main)
    providers.json 2023-07-01(0ac12df) 2022-02-01-preview(main)
    secrets.json 2023-07-01(0ac12df) 2023-02-01(main)
    secrets.json 2023-07-01(0ac12df) 2022-02-01-preview(main)

    The following breaking changes are detected by comparison with the latest preview version:

    Rule Message
    ⚠️ 1027 - DefaultValueChanged The new version has a different default value than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.KeyVault/stable/2023-07-01/keys.json#L482:9
    Old: Microsoft.KeyVault/preview/2022-02-01-preview/keys.json#L482:9
    ⚠️ 1027 - DefaultValueChanged The new version has a different default value than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.KeyVault/stable/2023-07-01/managedHsm.json#L1350:9
    Old: Microsoft.KeyVault/preview/2022-02-01-preview/managedHsm.json#L1250:9
    ⚠️ 1027 - DefaultValueChanged The new version has a different default value than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.KeyVault/stable/2023-07-01/managedHsm.json#L1362:9
    Old: Microsoft.KeyVault/preview/2022-02-01-preview/managedHsm.json#L1263:9
    ️️✔️CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand] 
    There is no credential detected.
    ️⚠️LintDiff: 0 Warnings warning [Detail]
    compared tags (via openapi-validator v2.1.4) new version base version
    package-2023-07 package-2023-07(0ac12df) default(main)

    The following errors/warnings exist before current PR submission:

    Only 30 items are listed, please refer to log for more details.

    Rule Message
    ❌ PutRequestResponseSchemeArm A PUT operation request body schema should be the same as its 200 response schema, to allow reusing the same entity between GET and PUT. If the schema of the PUT request body is a superset of the GET response body, make sure you have a PATCH operation to make the resource updatable. Operation: 'Keys_CreateIfNotExist' Request Model: 'parameters[5].schema' Response Model: 'responses[200].schema'
    Location: Microsoft.KeyVault/stable/2023-07-01/keys.json#L14
    ❌ PutResponseSchemaDescription Any Put MUST contain 200 and 201 return codes.
    Location: Microsoft.KeyVault/stable/2023-07-01/keys.json#L60
    ❌ DefinitionsPropertiesNamesCamelCase Property name should be camel case.
    Location: Microsoft.KeyVault/stable/2023-07-01/keys.json#L428
    ❌ AllTrackedResourcesMustHaveDelete The resource Key does not have a corresponding delete operation.
    Location: Microsoft.KeyVault/stable/2023-07-01/keys.json#L512
    ❌ TrackedResourcePatchOperation Tracked resource 'Key' must have patch operation that at least supports the update of tags.
    Location: Microsoft.KeyVault/stable/2023-07-01/keys.json#L512
    ❌ XmsParameterLocation The parameter 'SubscriptionIdParameter' is defined in global parameters section without 'x-ms-parameter-location' extension. This would add the parameter as the client property. Please ensure that this is exactly you want. If so, apply the extension 'x-ms-parameter-location': 'client'. Else, apply the extension 'x-ms-parameter-location': 'method'.
    Location: Microsoft.KeyVault/stable/2023-07-01/keys.json#L646
    ❌ XmsParameterLocation The parameter 'ApiVersionParameter' is defined in global parameters section without 'x-ms-parameter-location' extension. This would add the parameter as the client property. Please ensure that this is exactly you want. If so, apply the extension 'x-ms-parameter-location': 'client'. Else, apply the extension 'x-ms-parameter-location': 'method'.
    Location: Microsoft.KeyVault/stable/2023-07-01/keys.json#L653
    ❌ PutRequestResponseSchemeArm A PUT operation request body schema should be the same as its 200 response schema, to allow reusing the same entity between GET and PUT. If the schema of the PUT request body is a superset of the GET response body, make sure you have a PATCH operation to make the resource updatable. Operation: 'ManagedHsmKeys_CreateIfNotExist' Request Model: 'parameters[5].schema' Response Model: 'responses[200].schema'
    Location: Microsoft.KeyVault/stable/2023-07-01/keysManagedHsm.json#L14
    ❌ PutResponseSchemaDescription Any Put MUST contain 200 and 201 return codes.
    Location: Microsoft.KeyVault/stable/2023-07-01/keysManagedHsm.json#L46
    ❌ PutRequestResponseSchemeArm A PUT operation request body schema should be the same as its 200 response schema, to allow reusing the same entity between GET and PUT. If the schema of the PUT request body is a superset of the GET response body, make sure you have a PATCH operation to make the resource updatable. Operation: 'Vaults_CreateOrUpdate' Request Model: 'parameters[3].schema' Response Model: 'responses[200].schema'
    Location: Microsoft.KeyVault/stable/2023-07-01/keyvault.json#L14
    ❌ LroErrorContent Error response content of long running operations must follow the error schema provided in the common types v2 and above.
    Location: Microsoft.KeyVault/stable/2023-07-01/keyvault.json#L69
    ❌ RequestSchemaForTrackedResourcesMustHaveTags A tracked resource MUST always have tags as a top level optional property. Tracked resource does not have tags in the request schema.
    Location: Microsoft.KeyVault/stable/2023-07-01/keyvault.json#L268
    ❌ PutResponseSchemaDescription Description of 201 response code of a PUT operation MUST include term 'create'.
    Location: Microsoft.KeyVault/stable/2023-07-01/keyvault.json#L322
    ❌ ResourceNameRestriction The resource name parameter 'vaultName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction.
    Location: Microsoft.KeyVault/stable/2023-07-01/keyvault.json#L511
    ❌ ParametersOrder The parameters:vaultName,location should be kept in the same order as they present in the path.
    Location: Microsoft.KeyVault/stable/2023-07-01/keyvault.json#L512
    ❌ ResourceNameRestriction The resource name parameter 'vaultName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction.
    Location: Microsoft.KeyVault/stable/2023-07-01/keyvault.json#L567
    ❌ LroPostReturn 200 response for a LRO POST operation must have a response schema specified.
    Location: Microsoft.KeyVault/stable/2023-07-01/keyvault.json#L568
    ❌ ParametersOrder The parameters:vaultName,location should be kept in the same order as they present in the path.
    Location: Microsoft.KeyVault/stable/2023-07-01/keyvault.json#L568
    ❌ PostOperationAsyncResponseValidation An async POST operation must set long running operation options 'x-ms-long-running-operation-options'
    Location: Microsoft.KeyVault/stable/2023-07-01/keyvault.json#L568
    ❌ LroLocationHeader A 202 response should include an Location response header.
    Location: Microsoft.KeyVault/stable/2023-07-01/keyvault.json#L601
    ❌ LroErrorContent Error response content of long running operations must follow the error schema provided in the common types v2 and above.
    Location: Microsoft.KeyVault/stable/2023-07-01/keyvault.json#L607
    ❌ PathContainsResourceType The path for the CURD methods do not contain a resource type.
    Location: Microsoft.KeyVault/stable/2023-07-01/keyvault.json#L624
    ❌ ResourceNameRestriction The resource name parameter 'privateEndpointConnectionName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction.
    Location: Microsoft.KeyVault/stable/2023-07-01/keyvault.json#L750
    ❌ GetOperation200 The get operation should only return 200.
    Location: Microsoft.KeyVault/stable/2023-07-01/keyvault.json#L789
    ❌ PutResponseSchemaDescription Any Put MUST contain 200 and 201 return codes.
    Location: Microsoft.KeyVault/stable/2023-07-01/keyvault.json#L843
    ❌ DeleteResponseBodyEmpty The delete response body must be empty.
    Location: Microsoft.KeyVault/stable/2023-07-01/keyvault.json#L903
    ❌ LroErrorContent Error response content of long running operations must follow the error schema provided in the common types v2 and above.
    Location: Microsoft.KeyVault/stable/2023-07-01/keyvault.json#L927
    ❌ GetCollectionOnlyHasValueAndNextLink Get endpoints for collections of resources must only have the value and nextLink properties in their model.
    Location: Microsoft.KeyVault/stable/2023-07-01/keyvault.json#L1014
    ❌ GuidUsage Usage of Guid is not recommended. If GUIDs are absolutely required in your service, please get sign off from the Azure API review board.
    Location: Microsoft.KeyVault/stable/2023-07-01/keyvault.json#L1067
    ❌ GuidUsage Usage of Guid is not recommended. If GUIDs are absolutely required in your service, please get sign off from the Azure API review board.
    Location: Microsoft.KeyVault/stable/2023-07-01/keyvault.json#L1076
    ️️✔️Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand] 
    Validation passes for Avocado.
    ️️✔️SwaggerAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    ️️✔️TypeSpecAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    ️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand] 
    Validation passes for ModelValidation.
    ️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand] 
    Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
    ️️✔️PoliCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand] 
    Validation passed for PoliCheck.
    ️️✔️PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand] 
    Validation passes for PrettierCheck.
    ️️✔️SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand] 
    Validation passes for SpellCheck.
    ️️✔️Lint(RPaaS) succeeded [Detail] [Expand] 
    Validation passes for Lint(RPaaS).
    ️️✔️PR Summary succeeded [Detail] [Expand] 
    Validation passes for Summary.
    ️️✔️Automated merging requirements met succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented May 4, 2023 •
    edited
    Loading

    Swagger Generation Artifacts

    ️️✔️ApiDocPreview succeeded [Detail] [Expand] 
     Please click here to preview with your @microsoft account.
    ️️✔️SDK Breaking Change Tracking succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

    Breaking Changes Tracking




    ️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-net-track2 warning [Detail]
    • ⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from b594fd4. SDK Automation 14.0.0 
      command	pwsh ./eng/scripts/Automation-Sdk-Init.ps1 ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/initOutput.json
command	pwsh ./eng/scripts/Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1 ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/generateOutput.json
warn	No file changes detected after generation
    • ️✔️Azure.ResourceManager.KeyVault [View full logs]  
      info	[Changelog]
    ️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-python-track2 warning [Detail]
    • ⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from b594fd4. SDK Automation 14.0.0 
      command	sh scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initOutput.json
cmderr	[automation_init.sh] WARNING: Skipping azure-nspkg as it is not installed.
command	sh scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateOutput.json
cmderr	[automation_generate.sh]
cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice New major version of npm available! 9.8.1 -> 10.2.0
cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice Changelog: <https://github.com/npm/cli/releases/tag/v10.2.0>
cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice Run `npm install -g [email protected]` to update!
cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice
    • ️✔️track2_azure-mgmt-keyvault [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes] 
      info	[Changelog] ### Features Added
info	[Changelog]
info	[Changelog]   - Model MHSMPrivateEndpointConnection has a new parameter identity
info	[Changelog]   - Model MHSMPrivateLinkResource has a new parameter identity
info	[Changelog]   - Model ManagedHsm has a new parameter identity
info	[Changelog]   - Model ManagedHsmResource has a new parameter identity
    ️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-java warning [Detail]
    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-go succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from b594fd4. SDK Automation 14.0.0 
      command	sh ./eng/scripts/automation_init.sh ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initOutput.json
command	generator automation-v2 ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️sdk/resourcemanager/keyvault/armkeyvault [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes] 
      info	[Changelog] ### Features Added
info	[Changelog]
info	[Changelog] - New value `ManagedHsmSKUNameCustomB6` added to enum type `ManagedHsmSKUName`
info	[Changelog] - New enum type `ManagedServiceIdentityType` with values `ManagedServiceIdentityTypeNone`, `ManagedServiceIdentityTypeSystemAssigned`, `ManagedServiceIdentityTypeSystemAssignedUserAssigned`, `ManagedServiceIdentityTypeUserAssigned`
info	[Changelog] - New struct `ManagedServiceIdentity`
info	[Changelog] - New struct `UserAssignedIdentity`
info	[Changelog] - New field `Identity` in struct `MHSMPrivateEndpointConnection`
info	[Changelog] - New field `Identity` in struct `MHSMPrivateLinkResource`
info	[Changelog] - New field `Identity` in struct `ManagedHsm`
info	[Changelog] - New field `Identity` in struct `ManagedHsmResource`
info	[Changelog]
info	[Changelog] Total 0 breaking change(s), 14 additive change(s).
    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-js succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from b594fd4. SDK Automation 14.0.0 
      command	sh .scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initOutput.json
warn	File azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initOutput.json not found to read
command	sh .scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️@azure/arm-keyvault [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes] 
      info	[Changelog] **Features**
info	[Changelog]
info	[Changelog]   - Added Interface ManagedServiceIdentity
info	[Changelog]   - Added Interface UserAssignedIdentity
info	[Changelog]   - Added Type Alias ManagedServiceIdentityType
info	[Changelog]   - Interface ManagedHsmResource has a new optional parameter identity
info	[Changelog]   - Added Enum KnownManagedServiceIdentityType
    ️⚠️ azure-resource-manager-schemas warning [Detail]
    • ⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from b594fd4. Schema Automation 14.0.0 
      command	.sdkauto/initScript.sh ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initOutput.json
cmderr	[initScript.sh]  notice
cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm notice New major version of npm available! 8.19.4 -> 10.2.0
cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm notice Changelog: <https://github.com/npm/cli/releases/tag/v10.2.0>
cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm notice Run `npm install -g [email protected]` to update!
cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm notice
warn	File azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initOutput.json not found to read
command	.sdkauto/generateScript.sh ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️keyvault [View full logs]  [Release Schema Changes]
    ️❌ azure-powershell failed [Detail]
    • ❌Pipeline Framework Failed [Logs]Release - Generate from b594fd4. SDK Automation 14.0.0 
      command	sh ./tools/SwaggerCI/init.sh ../azure-powershell_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-powershell_tmp/initOutput.json
command	pwsh ./tools/SwaggerCI/psci.ps1 ../azure-powershell_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-powershell_tmp/generateOutput.json
SSL error: syscall failure: Broken pipe
Error: SSL error: syscall failure: Broken pipe
    • ⚠️Az.keyvault.DefaultTag [View full logs]  
      error	Fatal error: SSL error: syscall failure: Broken pipe
error	The following packages are still pending:
error		Az.keyvault.DefaultTag
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented May 4, 2023 •
    edited
    Loading

    Generated ApiView

    Language Package Name ApiView Link
    Go sdk/resourcemanager/keyvault/armkeyvault https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/ed6fef18c615413c92f259992054e9c6
    .Net Azure.ResourceManager.KeyVault There is no API change compared with the previous version
    Java azure-resourcemanager-keyvault-generated https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/424cb1442f7441cb9e73fa660293d41c
    JavaScript @azure/arm-keyvault https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/cd0728418ecd4f7da48cadf8cdcf05ec

    @fssevero fssevero requested a review from riteshchitlangia1 May 4, 2023 10:20
    This was referenced May 4, 2023
    Closed
    Closed
    @AzureRestAPISpecReview AzureRestAPISpecReview added CI-MissingBaseCommit new-api-version ReadyForApiTest <valid label in PR review process>add this label when swagger and service APIs are ready for test resource-manager labels May 4, 2023
    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    Hi, @fssevero, For review efficiency consideration, when creating a new api version, it is required to place API specs of the base version in the first commit, and push new version updates into successive commits. You can use OpenAPIHub to initialize the PR for adding a new version. For more details refer to the wiki. Or you could onboard API spec pipeline

    This was referenced May 4, 2023
    Closed
    Closed
    Closed
    @sjanamma sjanamma added the ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review label May 4, 2023
    @openapi-workflow-bot openapi-workflow-bot bot removed the WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required label May 4, 2023
    @microsoft-github-policy-service
    Copy link
    Contributor

    Hi, @fssevero. Your PR has no update for 14 days and it is marked as stale PR. If no further update for over 14 days, the bot will close the PR. If you want to refresh the PR, please remove no-recent-activity label.

    16 similar comments
    @microsoft-github-policy-service
    Copy link
    Contributor

    Hi, @fssevero. Your PR has no update for 14 days and it is marked as stale PR. If no further update for over 14 days, the bot will close the PR. If you want to refresh the PR, please remove no-recent-activity label.

    @microsoft-github-policy-service
    Copy link
    Contributor

    Hi, @fssevero. Your PR has no update for 14 days and it is marked as stale PR. If no further update for over 14 days, the bot will close the PR. If you want to refresh the PR, please remove no-recent-activity label.

    @microsoft-github-policy-service
    Copy link
    Contributor

    Hi, @fssevero. Your PR has no update for 14 days and it is marked as stale PR. If no further update for over 14 days, the bot will close the PR. If you want to refresh the PR, please remove no-recent-activity label.

    @microsoft-github-policy-service
    Copy link
    Contributor

    Hi, @fssevero. Your PR has no update for 14 days and it is marked as stale PR. If no further update for over 14 days, the bot will close the PR. If you want to refresh the PR, please remove no-recent-activity label.

    @microsoft-github-policy-service
    Copy link
    Contributor

    Hi, @fssevero. Your PR has no update for 14 days and it is marked as stale PR. If no further update for over 14 days, the bot will close the PR. If you want to refresh the PR, please remove no-recent-activity label.

    @microsoft-github-policy-service
    Copy link
    Contributor

    Hi, @fssevero. Your PR has no update for 14 days and it is marked as stale PR. If no further update for over 14 days, the bot will close the PR. If you want to refresh the PR, please remove no-recent-activity label.

    @microsoft-github-policy-service
    Copy link
    Contributor

    Hi, @fssevero. Your PR has no update for 14 days and it is marked as stale PR. If no further update for over 14 days, the bot will close the PR. If you want to refresh the PR, please remove no-recent-activity label.

    @microsoft-github-policy-service
    Copy link
    Contributor

    Hi, @fssevero. Your PR has no update for 14 days and it is marked as stale PR. If no further update for over 14 days, the bot will close the PR. If you want to refresh the PR, please remove no-recent-activity label.

    @microsoft-github-policy-service
    Copy link
    Contributor

    Hi, @fssevero. Your PR has no update for 14 days and it is marked as stale PR. If no further update for over 14 days, the bot will close the PR. If you want to refresh the PR, please remove no-recent-activity label.

    @microsoft-github-policy-service
    Copy link
    Contributor

    Hi, @fssevero. Your PR has no update for 14 days and it is marked as stale PR. If no further update for over 14 days, the bot will close the PR. If you want to refresh the PR, please remove no-recent-activity label.

    @microsoft-github-policy-service
    Copy link
    Contributor

    Hi, @fssevero. Your PR has no update for 14 days and it is marked as stale PR. If no further update for over 14 days, the bot will close the PR. If you want to refresh the PR, please remove no-recent-activity label.

    @microsoft-github-policy-service
    Copy link
    Contributor

    Hi, @fssevero. Your PR has no update for 14 days and it is marked as stale PR. If no further update for over 14 days, the bot will close the PR. If you want to refresh the PR, please remove no-recent-activity label.

    @microsoft-github-policy-service
    Copy link
    Contributor

    Hi, @fssevero. Your PR has no update for 14 days and it is marked as stale PR. If no further update for over 14 days, the bot will close the PR. If you want to refresh the PR, please remove no-recent-activity label.

    @microsoft-github-policy-service
    Copy link
    Contributor

    Hi, @fssevero. Your PR has no update for 14 days and it is marked as stale PR. If no further update for over 14 days, the bot will close the PR. If you want to refresh the PR, please remove no-recent-activity label.

    @microsoft-github-policy-service
    Copy link
    Contributor

    Hi, @fssevero. Your PR has no update for 14 days and it is marked as stale PR. If no further update for over 14 days, the bot will close the PR. If you want to refresh the PR, please remove no-recent-activity label.

    @microsoft-github-policy-service
    Copy link
    Contributor

    Hi, @fssevero. Your PR has no update for 14 days and it is marked as stale PR. If no further update for over 14 days, the bot will close the PR. If you want to refresh the PR, please remove no-recent-activity label.

    @fssevero fssevero removed the DoNotMerge <valid label in PR review process> use to hold merge after approval label Oct 12, 2023
    @rkmanda rkmanda merged commit b594fd4 into main Oct 12, 2023
    @rkmanda rkmanda deleted the fssevero-keyvault-Microsoft.KeyVault-2023-07-01 branch October 12, 2023 18:27
    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    Swagger pipeline restarted successfully, please wait for status update in this comment.

    This was referenced Oct 12, 2023
    Closed
    Closed
    Closed
    Closed
    Closed
    Closed
    jnlycklama pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 8, 2023
    @fssevero @msyyc @jnlycklama
    Microsoft.KeyVault 2023-07-01 Add changes for Trusted Access Mode (#2…
    80026f3 
    …3813)

* Adds base for updating Microsoft.KeyVault from version stable/2023-02-01 to version 2023-07-01

* Updates readme

* Updates API version in new specs and examples

* Add Identity to managed HSM resources

* Remove ManagedHsmIdentityTargetResource

* use common type for Identity

* Update identity definition

* Update readme.python.md

* Update readme.python.md

---------

Co-authored-by: Yuchao Yan <[email protected]>
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Reviewers

    @rkmanda rkmanda rkmanda approved these changes

    @jlichwa jlichwa jlichwa approved these changes

    @riteshchitlangia1 riteshchitlangia1 riteshchitlangia1 approved these changes

    @heaths heaths Awaiting requested review from heaths

    @msyyc msyyc Awaiting requested review from msyyc msyyc is a code owner

    Assignees

    @rkmanda rkmanda

    Labels
    ARMReview ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review CI-MissingBaseCommit commitAfterSignedOff KeyVault new-api-version ReadyForApiTest <valid label in PR review process>add this label when swagger and service APIs are ready for test resource-manager
    Projects
    None yet
    Milestone
    No milestone
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
    8 participants
    @fssevero @zedy-wj @rkmanda @jlichwa @riteshchitlangia1 @AzureRestAPISpecReview @sjanamma @msyyc