Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update AppServicePlans.json #23776

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 5, 2023
Merged

Conversation

prampMSFT
Copy link
Contributor

@prampMSFT prampMSFT commented May 1, 2023

ARM API Information (Control Plane)

MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.

Azure 1st Party Service can try out the Shift Left experience to initiate API design review from ADO code repo. If you are interested, may request engineering support by filling in with the form https://aka.ms/ShiftLeftSupportForm.

Changelog

Add a changelog entry for this PR by answering the following questions:

  1. What's the purpose of the update?
    • new service onboarding
    • new API version
    • update existing version for new feature
    • update existing version to fix swagger quality issue in s360
    • Other, please clarify
  2. When are you targeting to deploy the new service/feature to public regions? Please provide the date or, if the date is not yet available, the month.
  3. When do you expect to publish the swagger? Please provide date or, the the date is not yet available, the month.
  4. By default, Azure SDKs of all languages (.NET/Python/Java/JavaScript for both management-plane SDK and data-plane SDK, Go for management-plane SDK only ) MUST be refreshed with/after swagger of new version is published. If you prefer NOT to refresh any specific SDK language upon swagger updates in the current PR, please leave details with justification here.

Contribution checklist (MS Employees Only):

If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.

ARM API Review Checklist

Applicability: ⚠️

If your changes encompass only the following scenarios, you should SKIP this section, as these scenarios do not require ARM review.

  • Change to data plane APIs
  • Adding new properties
  • All removals

Otherwise your PR may be subject to ARM review requirements. Complete the following:

  • Check this box if any of the following apply to the PR so that the label "ARMReview" and "WaitForARMFeedback" will be added by bot to kick off ARM API Review. Missing to check this box in the following scenario may result in delays to the ARM manifest review and deployment.

    • Adding a new service
    • Adding new API(s)
    • Adding a new API version
      -[ ] To review changes efficiently, ensure you copy the existing version into the new directory structure for first commit and then push new changes, including version updates, in separate commits. You can use OpenAPIHub to initialize the PR for adding a new version. For more details refer to the wiki.
  • Ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.

  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.

Breaking Change Review Checklist

If you have any breaking changes as defined in the Breaking Change Policy, request approval from the Breaking Change Review Board.

Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Additional details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking Change Wiki.

NOTE: To update API(s) in public preview for over 1 year (refer to Retirement of Previews)

Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.

Updating the Description for the App Service Plans - Reboot Worker API. With VMSS stamps being utilized for App Services, the worker names need not necessarily have to start with RD. They can start with RD, dw, pd, xn, lw, pl, hr, aw, al etc. Due to multiple variations, making changes to the description.
@prampMSFT prampMSFT requested a review from naveedaz as a code owner May 1, 2023 12:45
@openapi-workflow-bot
Copy link

Hi, @prampMSFT Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips.

  • Please ensure to do self-check against checklists in first PR comment.
  • PR assignee is the person auto-assigned and responsible for your current PR reviewing and merging.
  • For specs comparison cross API versions, Use API Specs Comparison Report Generator
  • If there is CI failure(s), to fix CI error(s) is mandatory for PR merging; or you need to provide justification in PR comment for explanation. How to fix?

  • Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. [email protected]

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented May 1, 2023

    Swagger Validation Report

    ️️✔️BreakingChange succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There are no breaking changes.
    compared swaggers (via Oad v0.10.4)] new version base version
    AppServicePlans.json 2022-03-01(9a85f94) 2022-03-01(main)
    ️️✔️Breaking Change(Cross-Version) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There are no breaking changes.
    ️️✔️CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There is no credential detected.
    ️⚠️LintDiff: 0 Warnings warning [Detail]
    compared tags (via openapi-validator v2.0.0) new version base version
    package-2022-03 package-2022-03(9a85f94) package-2022-03(main)

    The following errors/warnings exist before current PR submission:

    Only 30 items are listed, please refer to log for more details.

    Rule Message
    GetCollectionResponseSchema The response in the GET collection operation 'AppServicePlans_List' does not match the response definition in the individual GET operation 'AppServicePlans_Get' .
    Location: Microsoft.Web/stable/2022-03-01/AppServicePlans.json#L18
    CreateOperationAsyncResponseValidation An async PUT operation must set long running operation options 'x-ms-long-running-operation-options'
    Location: Microsoft.Web/stable/2022-03-01/AppServicePlans.json#L157
    CreateOperationAsyncResponseValidation An async PUT operation must return 201.
    Location: Microsoft.Web/stable/2022-03-01/AppServicePlans.json#L191
    CreateOperationAsyncResponseValidation Only 201 is the supported response code for PUT async response.
    Location: Microsoft.Web/stable/2022-03-01/AppServicePlans.json#L198
    LroLocationHeader A 202 response should include an Location response header.
    Location: Microsoft.Web/stable/2022-03-01/AppServicePlans.json#L198
    PatchSkuProperty The patch operation body parameter schema should contains property 'sku'.
    Location: Microsoft.Web/stable/2022-03-01/AppServicePlans.json#L281
    UnSupportedPatchProperties The patch operation body parameter schema should not contains property name.
    Location: Microsoft.Web/stable/2022-03-01/AppServicePlans.json#L281
    UnSupportedPatchProperties The patch operation body parameter schema should not contains property type.
    Location: Microsoft.Web/stable/2022-03-01/AppServicePlans.json#L281
    LroLocationHeader A 202 response should include an Location response header.
    Location: Microsoft.Web/stable/2022-03-01/AppServicePlans.json#L304
    ResourceNameRestriction The resource name parameter 'namespaceName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction.
    Location: Microsoft.Web/stable/2022-03-01/AppServicePlans.json#L369
    ResourceNameRestriction The resource name parameter 'relayName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction.
    Location: Microsoft.Web/stable/2022-03-01/AppServicePlans.json#L369
    ResourceNameRestriction The resource name parameter 'namespaceName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction.
    Location: Microsoft.Web/stable/2022-03-01/AppServicePlans.json#L479
    ResourceNameRestriction The resource name parameter 'relayName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction.
    Location: Microsoft.Web/stable/2022-03-01/AppServicePlans.json#L479
    ResourceNameRestriction The resource name parameter 'namespaceName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction.
    Location: Microsoft.Web/stable/2022-03-01/AppServicePlans.json#L535
    ResourceNameRestriction The resource name parameter 'relayName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction.
    Location: Microsoft.Web/stable/2022-03-01/AppServicePlans.json#L535
    PathForNestedResource The path for nested resource doest not meet the valid resource pattern.
    Location: Microsoft.Web/stable/2022-03-01/AppServicePlans.json#L594
    ResourceNameRestriction The resource name parameter 'vnetName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction.
    Location: Microsoft.Web/stable/2022-03-01/AppServicePlans.json#L929
    ResourceNameRestriction The resource name parameter 'vnetName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction.
    Location: Microsoft.Web/stable/2022-03-01/AppServicePlans.json#L982
    ResourceNameRestriction The resource name parameter 'gatewayName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction.
    Location: Microsoft.Web/stable/2022-03-01/AppServicePlans.json#L982
    RepeatedPathInfo The 'vnetName' already appears in the path, please don't repeat it in the request body.
    Location: Microsoft.Web/stable/2022-03-01/AppServicePlans.json#L1055
    ResourceNameRestriction The resource name parameter 'vnetName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction.
    Location: Microsoft.Web/stable/2022-03-01/AppServicePlans.json#L1101
    PutGetPatchResponseSchema /subscriptions/{subscriptionId}/resourceGroups/{resourceGroupName}/providers/Microsoft.Web/serverfarms/{name}/virtualNetworkConnections/{vnetName}/routes/{routeName} has different responses for PUT/GET/PATCH operations. The PUT/GET/PATCH operations must have same schema response.
    Location: Microsoft.Web/stable/2022-03-01/AppServicePlans.json#L1153
    ResourceNameRestriction The resource name parameter 'vnetName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction.
    Location: Microsoft.Web/stable/2022-03-01/AppServicePlans.json#L1153
    ResourceNameRestriction The resource name parameter 'routeName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction.
    Location: Microsoft.Web/stable/2022-03-01/AppServicePlans.json#L1153
    DeleteOperationResponses The delete operation is defined without a 200 or 204 error response implementation,please add it.'
    Location: Microsoft.Web/stable/2022-03-01/AppServicePlans.json#L1325
    UnSupportedPatchProperties The patch operation body parameter schema should not contains property name.
    Location: Microsoft.Web/stable/2022-03-01/AppServicePlans.json#L1373
    UnSupportedPatchProperties The patch operation body parameter schema should not contains property type.
    Location: Microsoft.Web/stable/2022-03-01/AppServicePlans.json#L1373
    ResourceNameRestriction The resource name parameter 'workerName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction.
    Location: Microsoft.Web/stable/2022-03-01/AppServicePlans.json#L1413
    XmsParameterLocation The parameter 'subscriptionIdParameter' is defined in global parameters section without 'x-ms-parameter-location' extension. This would add the parameter as the client property. Please ensure that this is exactly you want. If so, apply the extension 'x-ms-parameter-location': 'client'. Else, apply the extension 'x-ms-parameter-location': 'method'.
    Location: Microsoft.Web/stable/2022-03-01/AppServicePlans.json#L1730
    XmsParameterLocation The parameter 'apiVersionParameter' is defined in global parameters section without 'x-ms-parameter-location' extension. This would add the parameter as the client property. Please ensure that this is exactly you want. If so, apply the extension 'x-ms-parameter-location': 'client'. Else, apply the extension 'x-ms-parameter-location': 'method'.
    Location: Microsoft.Web/stable/2022-03-01/AppServicePlans.json#L1748
    ️️✔️Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for Avocado.
    ️️✔️ApiReadinessCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    ️⚠️~[Staging] ServiceAPIReadinessTest: 0 Warnings warning [Detail]

    API Test is not triggered due to precheck failure. Check pipeline log for details.

    ️️✔️SwaggerAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    ️️✔️CadlAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    ️️✔️TypeSpecAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    ️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for ModelValidation.
    ️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
    ️️✔️PoliCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passed for PoliCheck.
    ️️✔️PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for PrettierCheck.
    ️️✔️SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SpellCheck.
    ️️✔️Lint(RPaaS) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for Lint(RPaaS).
    ️️✔️CadlValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for CadlValidation.
    ️️✔️TypeSpec Validation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for TypeSpec Validation.
    ️️✔️PR Summary succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for Summary.
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented May 1, 2023

    Swagger Generation Artifacts

    ️️✔️ApiDocPreview succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

    Only 0 items are rendered, please refer to log for more details.

    ️️✔️SDK Breaking Change Tracking succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

    Only 0 items are rendered, please refer to log for more details.

    ️❌ azure-sdk-for-net-track2 failed [Detail]

    Only 0 items are rendered, please refer to log for more details.

    ️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-python-track2 warning [Detail]

    Only 0 items are rendered, please refer to log for more details.

    ️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-java warning [Detail]

    Only 0 items are rendered, please refer to log for more details.

    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-go succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

    Only 0 items are rendered, please refer to log for more details.

    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-js succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

    Only 0 items are rendered, please refer to log for more details.

    ️🔄 azure-resource-manager-schemas inProgress [Detail]
    ️❌ azure-powershell failed [Detail]

    Only 0 items are rendered, please refer to log for more details.

    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented May 1, 2023

    Generated ApiView

    Language Package Name ApiView Link
    Go sdk/resourcemanager/appservice/armappservice https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/defa96c1375b4e298f7d096763a45bff
    Java azure-resourcemanager-appservice-generated https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/b3a33599a1c54eb8955a8b1b0f13156e
    JavaScript @azure/arm-appservice https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/d749dc990424444e88d823517e509fee

    @v-jiaodi v-jiaodi added the Approved-OkToMerge <valid label in PR review process>add this label when assignee approve to merge the updates label May 4, 2023
    @weidongxu-microsoft
    Copy link
    Member

    You may want to make a PR to release branch as well https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs/tree/release-web-2023-01-01

    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    Approved-OkToMerge <valid label in PR review process>add this label when assignee approve to merge the updates resource-manager Web Apps
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    4 participants