Revert Standard_Basic sku type for Application Gateway

[amperugu]

ARM API Information (Control Plane)

MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.

Azure 1st Party Service can try out the Shift Left experience to initiate API design review from ADO code repo. If you are interested, may request engineering support by filling in with the form https://aka.ms/ShiftLeftSupportForm.

Changelog

Add a changelog entry for this PR by answering the following questions:

1. What's the purpose of the update?
   • new service onboarding
   • new API version
   • update existing version for new feature
   • update existing version to fix swagger quality issue in s360
   • Other, please clarify
2. When are you targeting to deploy the new service/feature to public regions? Please provide the date or, if the date is not yet available, the month.
3. When do you expect to publish the swagger? Please provide date or, the the date is not yet available, the month.
4. By default, Azure SDKs of all languages (.NET/Python/Java/JavaScript for both management-plane SDK and data-plane SDK, Go for management-plane SDK only ) MUST be refreshed with/after swagger of new version is published. If you prefer NOT to refresh any specific SDK language upon swagger updates in the current PR, please leave details with justification here.

Contribution checklist (MS Employees Only):

• I commit to follow the Breaking Change Policy of "no breaking changes"
• I have reviewed the documentation for the workflow.
• Validation tools were run on swagger spec(s) and errors have all been fixed in this PR. How to fix?

If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.

ARM API Review Checklist

Applicability: ⚠️

If your changes encompass only the following scenarios, you should SKIP this section, as these scenarios do not require ARM review.

• Change to data plane APIs
• Adding new properties
• All removals

Otherwise your PR may be subject to ARM review requirements. Complete the following:

• Check this box if any of the following apply to the PR so that the label "ARMReview" and "WaitForARMFeedback" will be added by bot to kick off ARM API Review. Missing to check this box in the following scenario may result in delays to the ARM manifest review and deployment.

  • Adding a new service
  • Adding new API(s)
  • Adding a new API version
    -[ ] To review changes efficiently, ensure you copy the existing version into the new directory structure for first commit and then push new changes, including version updates, in separate commits. You can use OpenAPIHub to initialize the PR for adding a new version. For more details refer to the wiki.

• Ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.

• If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.

Breaking Change Review Checklist

If you have any breaking changes as defined in the Breaking Change Policy, request approval from the Breaking Change Review Board.

Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Additional details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking Change Wiki.

NOTE: To update API(s) in public preview for over 1 year (refer to Retirement of Previews)

Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.

The enum needs to be removed for the following reasons:

1. API implementation to support the enum is not ready yet
2. the enum name is incorrect

[openapi-workflow-bot]

Hi, @amperugu Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips.

Please ensure to do self-check against checklists in first PR comment.

PR assignee is the person auto-assigned and responsible for your current PR reviewing and merging.

For specs comparison cross API versions, Use API Specs Comparison Report Generator

If there is CI failure(s), to fix CI error(s) is mandatory for PR merging; or you need to provide justification in PR comment for explanation. How to fix?

Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. [email protected]

[openapi-pipeline-app]

Swagger Validation Report

️❌BreakingChange: 2 Errors, 0 Warnings failed [Detail]

compared swaggers (via Oad v0.10.4)]	new version	base version
applicationGateway.json	2022-07-01(d364752)	2022-07-01(main)

Rule	Message
❌ 1019 - RemovedEnumValue	The new version is removing enum value(s) 'Standard_Basic' from the old version. New: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/applicationGateway.json#L1285:9 Old: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/applicationGateway.json#L1285:9
❌ 1019 - RemovedEnumValue	The new version is removing enum value(s) 'Standard_Basic' from the old version. New: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/applicationGateway.json#L1302:9 Old: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/applicationGateway.json#L1303:9

️️✔️Breaking Change(Cross-Version) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

There are no breaking changes.

️️✔️CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

There is no credential detected.

️⚠️LintDiff: 0 Warnings warning [Detail]

compared tags (via openapi-validator v2.0.0)	new version	base version
package-2022-07	package-2022-07(d364752)	package-2022-07(main)

The following errors/warnings exist before current PR submission:

Only 30 items are listed, please refer to log for more details.

Rule	Message
❌ ResourceNameRestriction	The resource name parameter 'applicationGatewayName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction. Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/applicationGateway.json#L37
❌ LongRunningResponseStatusCode	A 'delete' operation 'ApplicationGateways_Delete' with x-ms-long-running-operation extension must have a valid terminal success status code 200 or 204. Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/applicationGateway.json#L38
❌ LroLocationHeader	A 202 response should include an Location response header. Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/applicationGateway.json#L72
❌ PatchIdentityProperty	The patch operation body parameter schema should contains property 'identity'. Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/applicationGateway.json#L234
❌ ResourceNameRestriction	The resource name parameter 'applicationGatewayName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction. Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/applicationGateway.json#L351
❌ LroLocationHeader	A 202 response should include an Location response header. Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/applicationGateway.json#L389
❌ ResourceNameRestriction	The resource name parameter 'applicationGatewayName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction. Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/applicationGateway.json#L405
❌ LroLocationHeader	A 202 response should include an Location response header. Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/applicationGateway.json#L443
❌ ResourceNameRestriction	The resource name parameter 'applicationGatewayName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction. Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/applicationGateway.json#L459
❌ LroLocationHeader	A 202 response should include an Location response header. Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/applicationGateway.json#L507
❌ ResourceNameRestriction	The resource name parameter 'applicationGatewayName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction. Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/applicationGateway.json#L523
❌ LroLocationHeader	A 202 response should include an Location response header. Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/applicationGateway.json#L580
❌ ResourceNameRestriction	The resource name parameter 'applicationGatewayName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction. Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/applicationGateway.json#L596
❌ ResourceNameRestriction	The resource name parameter 'applicationGatewayName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction. Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/applicationGateway.json#L649
❌ ResourceNameRestriction	The resource name parameter 'connectionName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction. Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/applicationGateway.json#L649
❌ LongRunningResponseStatusCode	A 'delete' operation 'ApplicationGatewayPrivateEndpointConnections_Delete' with x-ms-long-running-operation extension must have a valid terminal success status code 200 or 204. Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/applicationGateway.json#L650
❌ LroLocationHeader	A 202 response should include an Location response header. Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/applicationGateway.json#L691
❌ CreateOperationAsyncResponseValidation	An async PUT operation must return 201. Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/applicationGateway.json#L756
❌ CreateOperationAsyncResponseValidation	Only 201 is the supported response code for PUT async response. Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/applicationGateway.json#L763
❌ LroLocationHeader	A 202 response should include an Location response header. Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/applicationGateway.json#L763
❌ ResourceNameRestriction	The resource name parameter 'applicationGatewayName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction. Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/applicationGateway.json#L839
❌ DefaultErrorResponseSchema	the default error response schema does not correspond to the schema documented at https://github.com/Azure/azure-resource-manager-rpc/blob/master/v1.0/common-api-details.md#error-response-content. Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/applicationGateway.json#L919
❌ DefaultErrorResponseSchema	the default error response schema does not correspond to the schema documented at https://github.com/Azure/azure-resource-manager-rpc/blob/master/v1.0/common-api-details.md#error-response-content. Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/applicationGateway.json#L955
❌ DefaultErrorResponseSchema	the default error response schema does not correspond to the schema documented at https://github.com/Azure/azure-resource-manager-rpc/blob/master/v1.0/common-api-details.md#error-response-content. Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/applicationGateway.json#L991
❌ TrackedResourcePatchOperation	Tracked resource 'ApplicationGatewayAvailableSslOptions' must have patch operation that at least supports the update of tags. Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/applicationGateway.json#L1036
❌ TrackedResourcesMustHavePut	The tracked resource ApplicationGatewayAvailableSslOptions does not have a corresponding put operation. Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/applicationGateway.json#L1036
❌ ResourceNameRestriction	The resource name parameter 'predefinedPolicyName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction. Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/applicationGateway.json#L1111
❌ MissingTypeObject	The schema 'ApplicationGatewayOnDemandProbe' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/applicationGateway.json#L1156
❌ MissingTypeObject	The schema 'ApplicationGatewayBackendHealthOnDemand' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/applicationGateway.json#L1194
❌ MissingTypeObject	The schema 'ApplicationGatewayBackendHealth' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/applicationGateway.json#L1207

️️✔️Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passes for Avocado.

️️✔️ApiReadinessCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

️⚠️~[Staging] ServiceAPIReadinessTest: 0 Warnings warning [Detail]

API Test is not triggered due to precheck failure. Check pipeline log for details.

️❌SwaggerAPIView: 0 Errors, 0 Warnings failed [Detail]

️️✔️CadlAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

️❌ModelValidation: 25 Errors, 0 Warnings failed [Detail]

Rule	Message
❌ LRO_RESPONSE_HEADER	Long running operation should return location or azure-AsyncOperation in header but not provided Url: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/applicationGateway.json#L71:22 ExampleUrl: stable/2022-07-01/examples/ApplicationGatewayDelete.json
❌ MISSING_RESOURCE_ID	id is required to return in response of GET/PUT resource calls but not being provided Url: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/applicationGateway.json#L1400:42 ExampleUrl: stable/2022-07-01/examples/ApplicationGatewayList.json#L22:17
❌ MISSING_RESOURCE_ID	id is required to return in response of GET/PUT resource calls but not being provided Url: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/applicationGateway.json#L1599:41 ExampleUrl: stable/2022-07-01/examples/ApplicationGatewayList.json#L32:17
❌ MISSING_RESOURCE_ID	id is required to return in response of GET/PUT resource calls but not being provided Url: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/applicationGateway.json#L1658:50 ExampleUrl: stable/2022-07-01/examples/ApplicationGatewayList.json#L41:17
❌ MISSING_RESOURCE_ID	id is required to return in response of GET/PUT resource calls but not being provided Url: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/applicationGateway.json#L1702:39 ExampleUrl: stable/2022-07-01/examples/ApplicationGatewayList.json#L51:17
❌ MISSING_RESOURCE_ID	id is required to return in response of GET/PUT resource calls but not being provided Url: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/applicationGateway.json#L1769:45 ExampleUrl: stable/2022-07-01/examples/ApplicationGatewayList.json#L59:17
❌ MISSING_RESOURCE_ID	id is required to return in response of GET/PUT resource calls but not being provided Url: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/applicationGateway.json#L1876:46 ExampleUrl: stable/2022-07-01/examples/ApplicationGatewayList.json#L74:17
❌ MISSING_RESOURCE_ID	id is required to return in response of GET/PUT resource calls but not being provided Url: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/applicationGateway.json#L2089:39 ExampleUrl: stable/2022-07-01/examples/ApplicationGatewayList.json#L85:17
❌ MISSING_RESOURCE_ID	id is required to return in response of GET/PUT resource calls but not being provided Url: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/applicationGateway.json#L2414:45 ExampleUrl: stable/2022-07-01/examples/ApplicationGatewayList.json#L103:17
❌ MISSING_RESOURCE_ID	id is required to return in response of GET/PUT resource calls but not being provided Url: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/applicationGateway.json#L3204:27 ExampleUrl: stable/2022-07-01/examples/ApplicationGatewayList.json#L11:11
❌ MISSING_RESOURCE_ID	id is required to return in response of GET/PUT resource calls but not being provided Url: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/applicationGateway.json#L1400:42 ExampleUrl: stable/2022-07-01/examples/ApplicationGatewayListAll.json#L21:17
❌ MISSING_RESOURCE_ID	id is required to return in response of GET/PUT resource calls but not being provided Url: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/applicationGateway.json#L1599:41 ExampleUrl: stable/2022-07-01/examples/ApplicationGatewayListAll.json#L31:17
❌ MISSING_RESOURCE_ID	id is required to return in response of GET/PUT resource calls but not being provided Url: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/applicationGateway.json#L1658:50 ExampleUrl: stable/2022-07-01/examples/ApplicationGatewayListAll.json#L40:17
❌ MISSING_RESOURCE_ID	id is required to return in response of GET/PUT resource calls but not being provided Url: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/applicationGateway.json#L1702:39 ExampleUrl: stable/2022-07-01/examples/ApplicationGatewayListAll.json#L50:17
❌ MISSING_RESOURCE_ID	id is required to return in response of GET/PUT resource calls but not being provided Url: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/applicationGateway.json#L1769:45 ExampleUrl: stable/2022-07-01/examples/ApplicationGatewayListAll.json#L58:17
❌ MISSING_RESOURCE_ID	id is required to return in response of GET/PUT resource calls but not being provided Url: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/applicationGateway.json#L1876:46 ExampleUrl: stable/2022-07-01/examples/ApplicationGatewayListAll.json#L73:17
❌ MISSING_RESOURCE_ID	id is required to return in response of GET/PUT resource calls but not being provided Url: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/applicationGateway.json#L2089:39 ExampleUrl: stable/2022-07-01/examples/ApplicationGatewayListAll.json#L84:17
❌ MISSING_RESOURCE_ID	id is required to return in response of GET/PUT resource calls but not being provided Url: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/applicationGateway.json#L2414:45 ExampleUrl: stable/2022-07-01/examples/ApplicationGatewayListAll.json#L102:17
❌ MISSING_RESOURCE_ID	id is required to return in response of GET/PUT resource calls but not being provided Url: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/applicationGateway.json#L3204:27 ExampleUrl: stable/2022-07-01/examples/ApplicationGatewayListAll.json#L10:11
❌ LRO_RESPONSE_HEADER	Long running operation should return location or azure-AsyncOperation in header but not provided Url: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/applicationGateway.json#L385:22 ExampleUrl: stable/2022-07-01/examples/ApplicationGatewayStart.json
❌ LRO_RESPONSE_HEADER	Long running operation should return location or azure-AsyncOperation in header but not provided Url: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/applicationGateway.json#L439:22 ExampleUrl: stable/2022-07-01/examples/ApplicationGatewayStop.json
❌ LRO_RESPONSE_HEADER	Long running operation should return location or azure-AsyncOperation in header but not provided Url: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/applicationGateway.json#L500:22 ExampleUrl: stable/2022-07-01/examples/ApplicationGatewayBackendHealthGet.json
❌ LRO_RESPONSE_HEADER	Long running operation should return location or azure-AsyncOperation in header but not provided Url: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/applicationGateway.json#L573:22 ExampleUrl: stable/2022-07-01/examples/ApplicationGatewayBackendHealthTest.json
❌ LRO_RESPONSE_HEADER	Long running operation should return location or azure-AsyncOperation in header but not provided Url: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/applicationGateway.json#L690:22 ExampleUrl: stable/2022-07-01/examples/ApplicationGatewayPrivateEndpointConnectionDelete.json
❌ MISSING_RESOURCE_ID	id is required to return in response of GET/PUT resource calls but not being provided Url: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/applicationGateway.json#L2907:52 ExampleUrl: stable/2022-07-01/examples/ApplicationGatewayPrivateEndpointConnectionUpdate.json#L23:15

️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passes for SemanticValidation.

️️✔️PoliCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passed for PoliCheck.

️️✔️PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passes for PrettierCheck.

️️✔️SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passes for SpellCheck.

️️✔️Lint(RPaaS) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passes for Lint(RPaaS).

️️✔️CadlValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passes for CadlValidation.

️️✔️PR Summary succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passes for Summary.

_{Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?}

[openapi-pipeline-app]

Swagger Generation Artifacts

️❌ApiDocPreview: 1 Errors, 0 Warnings failed [Detail]

Rule	Message
❌ RestBuild error	"logUrl":"https://apidrop.visualstudio.com/Content%20CI/_build/results?buildId=347874&view=logs&j=fd490c07-0b22-5182-fac9-6d67fe1e939b", "detail":"Unable to load the service index for source https://apidrop.pkgs.visualstudio.com/_packaging/ReferenceAutomationTool/nuget/v3/index.json."

️️✔️SDK Breaking Change Tracking succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Breaking Changes Tracking

️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-net succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

• ️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from b240d3c. SDK Automation 14.0.0

  command	pwsh ./eng/scripts/Automation-Sdk-Init.ps1 ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/initOutput.json
  command	autorest --version=2.0.4421 --csharp --reflect-api-versions --license-header=MICROSOFT_MIT_NO_VERSION [email protected]/[email protected] --csharp-sdks-folder=/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk ../azure-rest-api-specs/specification/network/resource-manager/readme.md
  cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
  cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
  cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
  cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
  cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
  cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied

• ️✔️Microsoft.Azure.Management.Network [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
  • Microsoft.Azure.Management.Network.25.0.0.nupkg
  • Microsoft.Azure.Management.Network.25.0.0.symbols.nupkg

️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-net-track2 succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

• ️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from b240d3c. SDK Automation 14.0.0

  command	pwsh ./eng/scripts/Automation-Sdk-Init.ps1 ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/initOutput.json
  command	pwsh ./eng/scripts/Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1 ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/generateOutput.json

• ️✔️Azure.ResourceManager.Network [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
  • Azure.ResourceManager.Network.1.2.0-alpha.20230222.1.nupkg

  info	[Changelog]

️🔄 azure-sdk-for-python-track2 inProgress [Detail]

️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-java succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

• ️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from b240d3c. SDK Automation 14.0.0

  command	./eng/mgmt/automation/init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/initOutput.json
  command	./eng/mgmt/automation/generate.py ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/generateOutput.json

• ️✔️azure-resourcemanager-network-generated [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
  • pom.xml
  • azure-resourcemanager-network-generated-1.0.0-beta.1-sources.jar
  • azure-resourcemanager-network-generated-1.0.0-beta.1.jar

️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-go succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

• ️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from b240d3c. SDK Automation 14.0.0

  command	sh ./eng/scripts/automation_init.sh ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initOutput.json
  command	generator automation-v2 ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateOutput.json

• ️✔️sdk/resourcemanager/network/armnetwork [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]

  info	[Changelog] ### Other Changes
  info	[Changelog]
  info	[Changelog] Total 0 breaking change(s), 0 additive change(s).

️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-js succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

• ️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from b240d3c. SDK Automation 14.0.0

  command	sh .scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initOutput.json
  warn	File azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initOutput.json not found to read
  command	sh .scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/generateOutput.json

• ️✔️@azure/arm-network [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes] Breaking Change Detected
  • azure-arm-network-31.0.0.tgz

  info	[Changelog] **Breaking Changes**
  info	[Changelog]
  info	[Changelog]   - Interface AdminRuleCollectionsListNextOptionalParams no longer has parameter skipToken
  info	[Changelog]   - Interface AdminRuleCollectionsListNextOptionalParams no longer has parameter top
  info	[Changelog]   - Interface AdminRulesListNextOptionalParams no longer has parameter skipToken
  info	[Changelog]   - Interface AdminRulesListNextOptionalParams no longer has parameter top
  info	[Changelog]   - Interface ConnectivityConfigurationsListNextOptionalParams no longer has parameter skipToken
  info	[Changelog]   - Interface ConnectivityConfigurationsListNextOptionalParams no longer has parameter top
  info	[Changelog]   - Interface ManagementGroupNetworkManagerConnectionsListNextOptionalParams no longer has parameter skipToken
  info	[Changelog]   - Interface ManagementGroupNetworkManagerConnectionsListNextOptionalParams no longer has parameter top
  info	[Changelog]   - Interface NetworkGroupsListNextOptionalParams no longer has parameter skipToken
  info	[Changelog]   - Interface NetworkGroupsListNextOptionalParams no longer has parameter top
  info	[Changelog]   - Interface NetworkInterfacesListVirtualMachineScaleSetIpConfigurationsNextOptionalParams no longer has parameter expand
  info	[Changelog]   - Interface NetworkManagersListBySubscriptionNextOptionalParams no longer has parameter skipToken
  info	[Changelog]   - Interface NetworkManagersListBySubscriptionNextOptionalParams no longer has parameter top
  info	[Changelog]   - Interface NetworkManagersListNextOptionalParams no longer has parameter skipToken
  info	[Changelog]   - Interface NetworkManagersListNextOptionalParams no longer has parameter top
  info	[Changelog]   - Interface ScopeConnectionsListNextOptionalParams no longer has parameter skipToken
  info	[Changelog]   - Interface ScopeConnectionsListNextOptionalParams no longer has parameter top
  info	[Changelog]   - Interface SecurityAdminConfigurationsListNextOptionalParams no longer has parameter skipToken
  info	[Changelog]   - Interface SecurityAdminConfigurationsListNextOptionalParams no longer has parameter top
  info	[Changelog]   - Interface ServiceTagInformationListNextOptionalParams no longer has parameter noAddressPrefixes
  info	[Changelog]   - Interface ServiceTagInformationListNextOptionalParams no longer has parameter tagName
  info	[Changelog]   - Interface StaticMembersListNextOptionalParams no longer has parameter skipToken
  info	[Changelog]   - Interface StaticMembersListNextOptionalParams no longer has parameter top
  info	[Changelog]   - Interface SubscriptionNetworkManagerConnectionsListNextOptionalParams no longer has parameter skipToken
  info	[Changelog]   - Interface SubscriptionNetworkManagerConnectionsListNextOptionalParams no longer has parameter top
  info	[Changelog]   - Interface VirtualNetworksListDdosProtectionStatusNextOptionalParams no longer has parameter skipToken
  info	[Changelog]   - Interface VirtualNetworksListDdosProtectionStatusNextOptionalParams no longer has parameter top

️🔄 azure-resource-manager-schemas inProgress [Detail]

️❌ azure-powershell failed [Detail]

• ❌Failed [Logs]Release - Generate from b240d3c. SDK Automation 14.0.0

  command	sh ./tools/SwaggerCI/init.sh ../azure-powershell_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-powershell_tmp/initOutput.json
  command	pwsh ./tools/SwaggerCI/psci.ps1 ../azure-powershell_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-powershell_tmp/generateOutput.json

• ❌Az.network [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]

_{Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?}

[openapi-pipeline-app]

Generated ApiView

Language	Package Name	ApiView Link
Go	sdk/resourcemanager/network/armnetwork	Create ApiView failed. Please ensure your github account in Azure/Microsoft is public and add a comment "/azp run" to re-trigger the CI.
Java	azure-resourcemanager-network-generated	Create ApiView failed. Please ensure your github account in Azure/Microsoft is public and add a comment "/azp run" to re-trigger the CI.
.Net	Azure.ResourceManager.Network	Create ApiView failed. Please ensure your github account in Azure/Microsoft is public and add a comment "/azp run" to re-trigger the CI.
JavaScript	@azure/arm-network	Create ApiView failed. Please ensure your github account in Azure/Microsoft is public and add a comment "/azp run" to re-trigger the CI.

[ghost]

Thank you for your contribution amperugu! We will review the pull request and get back to you soon.

[openapi-workflow-bot]

Hi @amperugu, one or multiple breaking change(s) is detected in your PR. Please check out the breaking change(s), and provide business justification in the PR comment and @ PR assignee why you must have these change(s), and how external customer impact can be mitigated. Please ensure to follow breaking change policy to request breaking change review and approval before proceeding swagger PR review.
Action: To initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.
If you want to know the production traffic statistic, please see ARM Traffic statistic.
If you think it is false positive breaking change, please provide the reasons in the PR comment, report to Swagger Tooling Team via https://aka.ms/swaggerfeedback.
Note: To avoid breaking change, you can refer to Shift Left Solution for detecting breaking change in early phase at your service code repository.

[openapi-workflow-bot]

Hi @amperugu, Your PR has some issues. Please fix the CI sequentially by following the order of Avocado, semantic validation, model validation, breaking change, lintDiff. If you have any questions, please post your questions in this channel https://aka.ms/swaggersupport.

Task	How to fix	Priority
Avocado	Fix-Avocado	High
Semantic validation	Fix-SemanticValidation-Error	High
Model validation	Fix-ModelValidation-Error	High
LintDiff	Fix-LintDiff	high

If you need further help, please feedback via swagger feedback.

[raych1]

@MikhailTryakhov , can you approve the change?

@amperugu , please follow breaking change review instructions to get the approval.
#22702 (comment)

[htippanaboya]

This PR is to revert the changes in PR #21976
The original PR was merged on Jan 6, 2023. No SDK or documentation releases happened in 2023 after the original PR was merged

[amperugu]

The enum needs to be removed for the following reasons:

1. API implementation to support the enum is not ready yet
2. The enum name "Standard_Basic" is incorrect

[raych1]

/azp run

[azure-pipelines]

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

[raych1]

@akning-ms , can you force merge this PR since python sdk check always hit time out?