Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

UsageV3 S360 Updates #22637

Merged

Conversation

JoeBeach-msft
Copy link
Contributor

@JoeBeach-msft JoeBeach-msft commented Feb 15, 2023

ARM API Information (Control Plane)

MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.

Azure 1st Party Service can try out the Shift Left experience to initiate API design review from ADO code repo. If you are interested, may request engineering support by filling in with the form https://aka.ms/ShiftLeftSupportForm.

Changelog

Add a changelog entry for this PR by answering the following questions:

  1. What's the purpose of the update?
    • update existing version for new feature
    • new service onboarding
    • new API version
    • update existing version to fix swagger quality issue in s360
    • Other, please clarify
  2. When are you targeting to deploy the new service/feature to public regions? Please provide the date or, if the date is not yet available, the month.
  3. When do you expect to publish the swagger? Please provide date or, the the date is not yet available, the month.
  4. By default, Azure SDKs of all languages (.NET/Python/Java/JavaScript for both management-plane SDK and data-plane SDK, Go for management-plane SDK only ) MUST be refreshed with/after swagger of new version is published. If you prefer NOT to refresh any specific SDK language upon swagger updates in the current PR, please leave details with justification here.

Contribution checklist (MS Employees Only):

If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.

ARM API Review Checklist

Applicability: ⚠️

If your changes encompass only the following scenarios, you should SKIP this section, as these scenarios do not require ARM review.

  • Change to data plane APIs
  • Adding new properties
  • All removals

Otherwise your PR may be subject to ARM review requirements. Complete the following:

  • Check this box if any of the following apply to the PR so that the label "ARMReview" and "WaitForARMFeedback" will be added by bot to kick off ARM API Review. Missing to check this box in the following scenario may result in delays to the ARM manifest review and deployment.

    • Adding a new service
    • Adding new API(s)
    • Adding a new API version
      -[ ] To review changes efficiently, ensure you copy the existing version into the new directory structure for first commit and then push new changes, including version updates, in separate commits. You can use OpenAPIHub to initialize the PR for adding a new version. For more details refer to the wiki.
  • Ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.

  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.

Breaking Change Review Checklist

If you have any breaking changes as defined in the Breaking Change Policy, request approval from the Breaking Change Review Board.

Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Additional details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking Change Wiki.

NOTE: To update API(s) in public preview for over 1 year (refer to Retirement of Previews)

Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.

UsageV3 S360 Updates

Added definitions for 202 responses and added 'error' as a property to definition for 'ErrorResponse'.

These changes were made to correct the below three items that were flagging for swagger compliance in S360.

image
image
image

Corrected three items that were flagging for swagger compliance in S360.

Added definitions for 202 responses and added 'error' as a property to definition for 'ErrorResponse'.
@JoeBeach-msft JoeBeach-msft added the Swagger Cleanup Indicating refactor/cleanup work needed label Feb 15, 2023
@JoeBeach-msft JoeBeach-msft self-assigned this Feb 15, 2023
@openapi-workflow-bot
Copy link

Hi, @JoeBeach-msft Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips.

  • Please ensure to do self-check against checklists in first PR comment.
  • PR assignee is the person auto-assigned and responsible for your current PR reviewing and merging.
  • For specs comparison cross API versions, Use API Specs Comparison Report Generator
  • If there is CI failure(s), to fix CI error(s) is mandatory for PR merging; or you need to provide justification in PR comment for explanation. How to fix?

  • Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. [email protected]

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Feb 15, 2023

    Swagger Validation Report

    ️❌BreakingChange: 2 Errors, 0 Warnings failed [Detail]
    compared swaggers (via Oad v0.10.4)] new version base version
    commerce.json 2015-06-01-preview(c80b871) 2015-06-01-preview(main)
    Rule Message
    1011 - AddingResponseCode The new version adds a response code '202'.
    New: Microsoft.Commerce/preview/2015-06-01-preview/commerce.json#L96:11
    1033 - RemovedProperty The new version is missing a property found in the old version. Was 'project' renamed or removed?
    Old: Microsoft.Commerce/preview/2015-06-01-preview/commerce.json#L153:7
    ️️✔️Breaking Change(Cross-Version) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There are no breaking changes.
    ️️✔️CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There is no credential detected.
    ️❌LintDiff: 2 Errors, 1 Warnings failed [Detail]
    compared tags (via openapi-validator v2.0.0) new version base version
    profile-hybrid-2020-09-01 profile-hybrid-2020-09-01(c80b871) profile-hybrid-2020-09-01(main)

    [must fix]The following errors/warnings are introduced by current PR:

    Rule Message Related RPC [For API reviewers]
    GetOperation200 The get operation should only return 200.
    Location: Microsoft.Commerce/preview/2015-06-01-preview/commerce.json#L96
    RPC-Get-V1-01
    LroLocationHeader A 202 response should include an Location response header.
    Location: Microsoft.Commerce/preview/2015-06-01-preview/commerce.json#L96
    RPC-Async-V1-07
    ⚠️ LroExtension Operations with a 202 response should specify x-ms-long-running-operation: true.
    Location: Microsoft.Commerce/preview/2015-06-01-preview/commerce.json#L21


    The following errors/warnings exist before current PR submission:

    Rule Message
    OperationsAPIImplementation Operations API must be implemented for 'Microsoft.Commerce'.
    Location: Microsoft.Commerce/preview/2015-06-01-preview/commerce.json#L1
    PathResourceTypeNameCamelCase Resource type naming must follow camel case. Path: '/subscriptions/{subscriptionId}/providers/Microsoft.Commerce/UsageAggregates'
    Location: Microsoft.Commerce/preview/2015-06-01-preview/commerce.json#L20
    DefaultErrorResponseSchema the default error response schema does not correspond to the schema documented at https://github.com/Azure/azure-resource-manager-rpc/blob/master/v1.0/common-api-details.md#error-response-content.
    Location: Microsoft.Commerce/preview/2015-06-01-preview/commerce.json#L102
    PathResourceTypeNameCamelCase Resource type naming must follow camel case. Path: '/subscriptions/{subscriptionId}/providers/Microsoft.Commerce/RateCard'
    Location: Microsoft.Commerce/preview/2015-06-01-preview/commerce.json#L114
    DefaultErrorResponseSchema the default error response schema does not correspond to the schema documented at https://github.com/Azure/azure-resource-manager-rpc/blob/master/v1.0/common-api-details.md#error-response-content.
    Location: Microsoft.Commerce/preview/2015-06-01-preview/commerce.json#L151
    MissingTypeObject The schema 'UsageSample' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Commerce/preview/2015-06-01-preview/commerce.json#L166
    GuidUsage Usage of Guid is not recommended. If GUIDs are absolutely required in your service, please get sign off from the Azure API review board.
    Location: Microsoft.Commerce/preview/2015-06-01-preview/commerce.json#L170
    MissingTypeObject The schema 'UsageAggregation' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Commerce/preview/2015-06-01-preview/commerce.json#L223
    MissingTypeObject The schema 'UsageAggregationListResult' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Commerce/preview/2015-06-01-preview/commerce.json#L245
    MissingTypeObject The schema 'RateCardQueryParameters' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Commerce/preview/2015-06-01-preview/commerce.json#L261
    MissingTypeObject The schema 'ResourceRateCardInfo' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Commerce/preview/2015-06-01-preview/commerce.json#L289
    MissingTypeObject The schema 'MeterInfo' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Commerce/preview/2015-06-01-preview/commerce.json#L326
    GuidUsage Usage of Guid is not recommended. If GUIDs are absolutely required in your service, please get sign off from the Azure API review board.
    Location: Microsoft.Commerce/preview/2015-06-01-preview/commerce.json#L332
    MissingTypeObject The schema 'OfferTermInfo' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Commerce/preview/2015-06-01-preview/commerce.json#L381
    MissingTypeObject The schema 'MonetaryCredit' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Commerce/preview/2015-06-01-preview/commerce.json#L408
    ValidFormats 'decimal' is not a known format.
    Location: Microsoft.Commerce/preview/2015-06-01-preview/commerce.json#L420
    GuidUsage Usage of Guid is not recommended. If GUIDs are absolutely required in your service, please get sign off from the Azure API review board.
    Location: Microsoft.Commerce/preview/2015-06-01-preview/commerce.json#L427
    MissingTypeObject The schema 'MonetaryCommitment' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Commerce/preview/2015-06-01-preview/commerce.json#L432
    ValidFormats 'decimal' is not a known format.
    Location: Microsoft.Commerce/preview/2015-06-01-preview/commerce.json#L446
    GuidUsage Usage of Guid is not recommended. If GUIDs are absolutely required in your service, please get sign off from the Azure API review board.
    Location: Microsoft.Commerce/preview/2015-06-01-preview/commerce.json#L454
    MissingTypeObject The schema 'RecurringCharge' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Commerce/preview/2015-06-01-preview/commerce.json#L459
    IntegerTypeMustHaveFormat The integer type does not have a format, please add it.
    Location: Microsoft.Commerce/preview/2015-06-01-preview/commerce.json#L468
    XmsParameterLocation The parameter 'SubscriptionIdParameter' is defined in global parameters section without 'x-ms-parameter-location' extension. This would add the parameter as the client property. Please ensure that this is exactly you want. If so, apply the extension 'x-ms-parameter-location': 'client'. Else, apply the extension 'x-ms-parameter-location': 'method'.
    Location: Microsoft.Commerce/preview/2015-06-01-preview/commerce.json#L490
    XmsParameterLocation The parameter 'ApiVersionParameter' is defined in global parameters section without 'x-ms-parameter-location' extension. This would add the parameter as the client property. Please ensure that this is exactly you want. If so, apply the extension 'x-ms-parameter-location': 'client'. Else, apply the extension 'x-ms-parameter-location': 'method'.
    Location: Microsoft.Commerce/preview/2015-06-01-preview/commerce.json#L497
    ⚠️ PreviewVersionOverOneYear The API version:2015-06-01-preview having been in a preview state over one year , please move it to GA or retire.
    Location: Microsoft.Commerce/preview/2015-06-01-preview/commerce.json#L5
    ⚠️ NonApplicationJsonType Only content-type 'application/json' is supported by ARM
    Location: Microsoft.Commerce/preview/2015-06-01-preview/commerce.json#L13
    ⚠️ NonApplicationJsonType Only content-type 'application/json' is supported by ARM
    Location: Microsoft.Commerce/preview/2015-06-01-preview/commerce.json#L17
    ⚠️ EnumInsteadOfBoolean Booleans properties are not descriptive in all cases and can make them to use, evaluate whether is makes sense to keep the property as boolean or turn it into an enum.
    Location: Microsoft.Commerce/preview/2015-06-01-preview/commerce.json#L52
    ⚠️ EnumInsteadOfBoolean Booleans properties are not descriptive in all cases and can make them to use, evaluate whether is makes sense to keep the property as boolean or turn it into an enum.
    Location: Microsoft.Commerce/preview/2015-06-01-preview/commerce.json#L300
    ️️✔️Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for Avocado.
    ️️✔️ApiReadinessCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    ️⚠️~[Staging] ServiceAPIReadinessTest: 0 Warnings warning [Detail]

    API Test is not triggered due to precheck failure. Check pipeline log for details.

    ️️✔️SwaggerAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    ️️✔️CadlAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    ️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for ModelValidation.
    ️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
    ️️✔️PoliCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passed for PoliCheck.
    ️️✔️PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for PrettierCheck.
    ️️✔️SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SpellCheck.
    ️️✔️Lint(RPaaS) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for Lint(RPaaS).
    ️️✔️CadlValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for CadlValidation.
    ️️✔️PR Summary succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for Summary.
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Feb 15, 2023

    Swagger Generation Artifacts

    ️️✔️ApiDocPreview succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
     Please click here to preview with your @microsoft account. 
    ️❌SDK Breaking Change Tracking failed [Detail]

    Breaking Changes Tracking

    azure-sdk-for-go - sdk/resourcemanager/commerce/armcommerce - 0.2.0
    +	Field `UsageAggregationListResult` of struct `UsageAggregatesClientListResponse` has been removed
    +	Struct `InfoField` has been removed

    ️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-python-track2 warning [Detail]
    • ⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from 85a2e04. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initOutput.json
      cmderr	[automation_init.sh] WARNING: Skipping azure-nspkg as it is not installed.
      command	sh scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateOutput.json
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh]
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice New minor version of npm available! 9.3.1 -> 9.6.0
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice Changelog: <https://github.com/npm/cli/releases/tag/v9.6.0>
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice Run `npm install -g [email protected]` to update!
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice
    • ️✔️track2_azure-mgmt-commerce [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
      info	[Changelog]
    ️❌ azure-sdk-for-java failed [Detail]
    • Failed [Logs]Release - Generate from 85a2e04. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	./eng/mgmt/automation/init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/initOutput.json
      command	./eng/mgmt/automation/generate.py ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • azure-resourcemanager-commerce [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-go succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from 85a2e04. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh ./eng/scripts/automation_init.sh ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initOutput.json
      command	generator automation-v2 ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️sdk/resourcemanager/commerce/armcommerce [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes] Breaking Change Detected
      info	[Changelog] ### Breaking Changes
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog] - Struct `InfoField` has been removed
      info	[Changelog] - Field `UsageAggregationListResult` of struct `UsageAggregatesClientListResponse` has been removed
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog] ### Features Added
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog] - Type of `UsageSample.InfoFields` has been changed from `*InfoField` to `any`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `Value` in struct `UsageAggregatesClientListResponse`
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog] Total 4 breaking change(s), 1 additive change(s).
    ️🔄 azure-sdk-for-js inProgress [Detail]
    ️⚠️ azure-resource-manager-schemas warning [Detail]
    • ⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from 85a2e04. Schema Automation 14.0.0
      command	.sdkauto/initScript.sh ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initOutput.json
      cmderr	[initScript.sh]  WARN old lockfile
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile The package-lock.json file was created with an old version of npm,
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile so supplemental metadata must be fetched from the registry.
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile This is a one-time fix-up, please be patient...
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile
      warn	File azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initOutput.json not found to read
      command	.sdkauto/generateScript.sh ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/generateOutput.json
      warn	No file changes detected after generation
    • ️✔️commerce [View full logs
    ️❌ azure-powershell failed [Detail]
    • Failed [Logs]Release - Generate from 85a2e04. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh ./tools/SwaggerCI/init.sh ../azure-powershell_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-powershell_tmp/initOutput.json
      command	pwsh ./tools/SwaggerCI/psci.ps1 ../azure-powershell_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-powershell_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • Az.commerce [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Feb 15, 2023

    Generated ApiView

    Language Package Name ApiView Link
    Go sdk/resourcemanager/commerce/armcommerce https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/01483dfacd4a4ed58957b05378ef64a5

    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    Hi @JoeBeach-msft, Your PR has some issues. Please fix the CI sequentially by following the order of Avocado, semantic validation, model validation, breaking change, lintDiff. If you have any questions, please post your questions in this channel https://aka.ms/swaggersupport.

    TaskHow to fixPriority
    AvocadoFix-AvocadoHigh
    Semantic validationFix-SemanticValidation-ErrorHigh
    Model validationFix-ModelValidation-ErrorHigh
    LintDiffFix-LintDiffhigh
    If you need further help, please feedback via swagger feedback.

    Removed the 202 response for Ratecard
    
    Ratecard is a different service that is not getting flagged for in S360 and does not support 202 response code.
    Swagger will not let ErrorResponse contain an error property with subproperties.
    
    Reverting ErrorResponse to contain "code" and "message" as its properties.
    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    Hi @JoeBeach-msft, one or multiple breaking change(s) is detected in your PR. Please check out the breaking change(s), and provide business justification in the PR comment and @ PR assignee why you must have these change(s), and how external customer impact can be mitigated. Please ensure to follow breaking change policy to request breaking change review and approval before proceeding swagger PR review.
    Action: To initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.
    If you want to know the production traffic statistic, please see ARM Traffic statistic.
    If you think it is false positive breaking change, please provide the reasons in the PR comment, report to Swagger Tooling Team via https://aka.ms/swaggerfeedback.
    Note: To avoid breaking change, you can refer to Shift Left Solution for detecting breaking change in early phase at your service code repository.

    Ran prettier in order to address Pull Request check.
    Added xm-ms-long-running-operation Property to the UsageAggregates_List get call in order to justify the addition of the 202 response.
    Added x-ms-long-running-operation-options.
    
    Adding a 202 response requires that these options be set.
    Reran prettier after the last commit to correct formatting issues.
    Added x-ms-example for GetUsageAggregates_List. PR check was flagging because there was no example present. Will create the referenced json file in the next commit.
    @AzureRestAPISpecReview AzureRestAPISpecReview removed the BreakingChangeReviewRequired <valid label in PR review process>add this label when breaking change review is required label Feb 17, 2023
    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    Please ensure to respond feedbacks from the ARM API reviewer. When you are ready to continue the ARM API review, please remove ARMChangesRequested

    @openapi-workflow-bot openapi-workflow-bot bot removed the WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required label Feb 25, 2023
    Removed all subproperties for InfoFields. Our api no longer returns any properties for InfoFields.
    Removed Infofields properties. Our api no longer returns any of these properties in a 200 response.
    Removed Property from InfoFields. This should have been removed along with the other properties in the previous commit.
    Removed longrunning operation from UsageAggregates_List.
    @pilor pilor removed the ARMChangesRequested <valid label in PR review process>add this label when require changes after ARM review label Mar 2, 2023
    @openapi-workflow-bot openapi-workflow-bot bot added the WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required label Mar 2, 2023
    @pilor pilor added ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review and removed WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required labels Mar 2, 2023
    Location header no longer needed.
    "202": {
    "description": "Response indicating that a request has been accepted for processing. However, the processing has not been completed.",
    "schema": {
    "$ref": "#/definitions/ErrorResponse"
    Copy link
    Member

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    This 202 is wrong.

    Why 202 returns ErrorResponse?

    Copy link
    Member

    @weidongxu-microsoft weidongxu-microsoft Mar 3, 2023

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    And what 202 do for a GET (and it is not LRO)?

    aviyerMSFT pushed a commit to aviyerMSFT/azure-rest-api-specs that referenced this pull request Mar 22, 2023
    * UsageV3 S360 Updates
    
    Corrected three items that were flagging for swagger compliance in S360.
    
    Added definitions for 202 responses and added 'error' as a property to definition for 'ErrorResponse'.
    
    * Removed 202 Response for Ratecard
    
    Removed the 202 response for Ratecard
    
    Ratecard is a different service that is not getting flagged for in S360 and does not support 202 response code.
    
    * Undo ErrorMessage Properties
    
    Swagger will not let ErrorResponse contain an error property with subproperties.
    
    Reverting ErrorResponse to contain "code" and "message" as its properties.
    
    * Ran Prettier
    
    Ran prettier in order to address Pull Request check.
    
    * Added xm-ms-long-running-operation Property
    
    Added xm-ms-long-running-operation Property to the UsageAggregates_List get call in order to justify the addition of the 202 response.
    
    * Added x-ms-long-running-operation-options
    
    Added x-ms-long-running-operation-options.
    
    Adding a 202 response requires that these options be set.
    
    * Prettier Run
    
    Reran prettier after the last commit to correct formatting issues.
    
    * Added x-ms-example for GetUsageAggregates_List
    
    Added x-ms-example for GetUsageAggregates_List. PR check was flagging because there was no example present. Will create the referenced json file in the next commit.
    
    * Added example file for UsageAggregates List
    
    There was previously no example for UsageAggregates List, but there was one for RateCard.
    
    The following documentation was used to generate this example file.
    https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/previous-versions/azure/reference/mt219001(v=azure.100)?redirectedfrom=MSDN#sample-responses
    
    * Corrected Formatting for UsageAggregatesList Example
    
    Value Array was missing brackets for its element.
    
    * Corrected Example File Name
    
    Corrected the file name to exclude an underscore.
    
    * Added Location Header to 202 Response
    
    Added location header to the 202 response.
    
    * Corrected Location to use double quotes
    
    Corrected formatting issue with the previous commit that added a location header to the 202 response.
    
    * Updated Example Fields
    
    Updated infofields to match the example given in the api documentation.
    
    * Added 202 Response
    
    Added a 202 response to the example file.
    
    * GetUsageAggregatesList.json Prettier Update
    
    Reran Prettier script on GetUsageAggregatesList.json
    
    * Updated case 'Daily' and Example 202 Response
    
    Updated case 'Daily' and Example 202 Response. These changes were made previously, but lost at some point.
    
    * Removed Error from 202 Body
    
    Error property not allowed in the response.
    
    * Removed InfoFields properties.
    
    Removed all subproperties for InfoFields. Our api no longer returns any properties for InfoFields.
    
    * Removed Infofields properties.
    
    Removed Infofields properties. Our api no longer returns any of these properties in a 200 response.
    
    * Removed InfoFields Properties
    
    Removed Property from InfoFields. This should have been removed along with the other properties in the previous commit.
    
    * Removed LongRunning operation
    
    Removed longrunning operation from UsageAggregates_List.
    
    * Removed Location Header
    
    Location header no longer needed.
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    Approved-BreakingChange DO NOT USE! OBSOLETE label. See https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-tools/issues/6374 Approved-LintDiff ARMReview ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review BreakingChangeReviewRequired <valid label in PR review process>add this label when breaking change review is required CI-BreakingChange-Go CI-FixRequiredOnFailure FixS360 resource-manager Swagger Cleanup Indicating refactor/cleanup work needed
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    8 participants