Adding ResourceGuardProxy APIs to Microsoft.Dataprotection latest stable version #22574

Charan000 · 2023-02-13T07:52:18Z

ARM API Information (Control Plane)

MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.

Azure 1st Party Service can try out the Shift Left experience to initiate API design review from ADO code repo. If you are interested, may request engineering support by filling in with the form https://aka.ms/ShiftLeftSupportForm.

Changelog

Add a changelog entry for this PR by answering the following questions:

What's the purpose of the update?
- new service onboarding
- new API version
- update existing version for new feature
- update existing version to fix swagger quality issue in s360
- Other, please clarify
When are you targeting to deploy the new service/feature to public regions? Please provide the date or, if the date is not yet available, the month.
When do you expect to publish the swagger? Please provide date or, the the date is not yet available, the month.
By default, Azure SDKs of all languages (.NET/Python/Java/JavaScript for both management-plane SDK and data-plane SDK, Go for management-plane SDK only ) MUST be refreshed with/after swagger of new version is published. If you prefer NOT to refresh any specific SDK language upon swagger updates in the current PR, please leave details with justification here.

Contribution checklist (MS Employees Only):

I commit to follow the Breaking Change Policy of "no breaking changes"
I have reviewed the documentation for the workflow.
Validation tools were run on swagger spec(s) and errors have all been fixed in this PR. How to fix?

If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.

ARM API Review Checklist

Applicability: ⚠️

If your changes encompass only the following scenarios, you should SKIP this section, as these scenarios do not require ARM review.

Change to data plane APIs

Adding new properties

All removals

Otherwise your PR may be subject to ARM review requirements. Complete the following:

Check this box if any of the following apply to the PR so that the label "ARMReview" and "WaitForARMFeedback" will be added by bot to kick off ARM API Review. Missing to check this box in the following scenario may result in delays to the ARM manifest review and deployment.
- Adding a new service
- Adding new API(s)
- Adding a new API version
  -[ ] To review changes efficiently, ensure you copy the existing version into the new directory structure for first commit and then push new changes, including version updates, in separate commits. You can use OpenAPIHub to initialize the PR for adding a new version. For more details refer to the wiki.
Ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.
If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.

Breaking Change Review Checklist

If you have any breaking changes as defined in the Breaking Change Policy, request approval from the Breaking Change Review Board.

Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Additional details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking Change Wiki.

NOTE: To update API(s) in public preview for over 1 year (refer to Retirement of Previews)

Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.

openapi-workflow-bot · 2023-02-13T07:52:22Z

Hi, @Charan000 Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips.

Please ensure to do self-check against checklists in first PR comment.

PR assignee is the person auto-assigned and responsible for your current PR reviewing and merging.

For specs comparison cross API versions, Use API Specs Comparison Report Generator

If there is CI failure(s), to fix CI error(s) is mandatory for PR merging; or you need to provide justification in PR comment for explanation. How to fix?

Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. [email protected]

openapi-pipeline-app · 2023-02-13T07:52:26Z

Swagger Validation Report

️❌BreakingChange: 3 Errors, 0 Warnings failed [Detail]

compared swaggers (via Oad v0.10.4)]	new version	base version
dataprotection.json	2023-01-01(96d6481)	2023-01-01(main)

Rule	Message
`❌` 1038 - AddedPath	The new version is adding a path that was not found in the old version. New: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2023-01-01/dataprotection.json#L3460:5
`❌` 1038 - AddedPath	The new version is adding a path that was not found in the old version. New: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2023-01-01/dataprotection.json#L3508:5
`❌` 1038 - AddedPath	The new version is adding a path that was not found in the old version. New: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2023-01-01/dataprotection.json#L3672:5

️️✔️Breaking Change(Cross-Version) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

There are no breaking changes.

️️✔️CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

There is no credential detected.

️❌LintDiff: 3 Errors, 1 Warnings failed [Detail]

compared tags (via openapi-validator v2.0.0)	new version	base version
package-2023-01	package-2023-01(96d6481)	package-2023-01(main)

[must fix]The following errors/warnings are introduced by current PR:

Rule	Message	Related RPC [For API reviewers]
`❌` ResourceNameRestriction	The resource name parameter 'vaultName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction. Location: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2023-01-01/dataprotection.json#L3460	RPC-Uri-V1-05
`❌` ResourceNameRestriction	The resource name parameter 'vaultName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction. Location: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2023-01-01/dataprotection.json#L3508	RPC-Uri-V1-05
`❌` ResourceNameRestriction	The resource name parameter 'vaultName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction. Location: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2023-01-01/dataprotection.json#L3672	RPC-Uri-V1-05
⚠️ AvoidNestedProperties	Consider using x-ms-client-flatten to provide a better end user experience Location: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2023-01-01/dataprotection.json#L7294

The following errors/warnings exist before current PR submission:

Only 30 items are listed, please refer to log for more details.

Rule	Message
`❌` ParametersOrder	The parameters:operationId,location should be kept in the same order as they present in the path. Location: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2023-01-01/dataprotection.json#L64
`❌` GetOperation200	The get operation should only return 200. Location: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2023-01-01/dataprotection.json#L94
`❌` ResourceNameRestriction	The resource name parameter 'vaultName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction. Location: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2023-01-01/dataprotection.json#L184
`❌` ResourceNameRestriction	The resource name parameter 'vaultName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction. Location: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2023-01-01/dataprotection.json#L328
`❌` CreateOperationAsyncResponseValidation	An async PUT operation must set long running operation options 'x-ms-long-running-operation-options' Location: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2023-01-01/dataprotection.json#L375
`❌` DeleteOperationAsyncResponseValidation	An async DELETE operation must set long running operation options 'x-ms-long-running-operation-options' Location: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2023-01-01/dataprotection.json#L440
`❌` LroLocationHeader	A 202 response should include an Location response header. Location: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2023-01-01/dataprotection.json#L467
`❌` LroLocationHeader	A 202 response should include an Location response header. Location: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2023-01-01/dataprotection.json#L526
`❌` ResourceNameRestriction	The resource name parameter 'vaultName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction. Location: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2023-01-01/dataprotection.json#L544
`❌` GetOperation200	The get operation should only return 200. Location: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2023-01-01/dataprotection.json#L580
`❌` ResourceNameRestriction	The resource name parameter 'vaultName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction. Location: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2023-01-01/dataprotection.json#L761
`❌` ResourceNameRestriction	The resource name parameter 'vaultName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction. Location: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2023-01-01/dataprotection.json#L809
`❌` ResourceNameRestriction	The resource name parameter 'backupPolicyName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction. Location: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2023-01-01/dataprotection.json#L809
`❌` ResourceNameRestriction	The resource name parameter 'vaultName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction. Location: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2023-01-01/dataprotection.json#L969
`❌` ResourceNameRestriction	The resource name parameter 'vaultName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction. Location: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2023-01-01/dataprotection.json#L1017
`❌` ResourceNameRestriction	The resource name parameter 'backupInstanceName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction. Location: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2023-01-01/dataprotection.json#L1017
`❌` CreateOperationAsyncResponseValidation	An async PUT operation must set long running operation options 'x-ms-long-running-operation-options' Location: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2023-01-01/dataprotection.json#L1064
`❌` CreateOperationAsyncResponseValidation	Only 201 is the supported response code for PUT async response. Location: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2023-01-01/dataprotection.json#L1112
`❌` DeleteOperationAsyncResponseValidation	An async DELETE operation must set long running operation options 'x-ms-long-running-operation-options' Location: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2023-01-01/dataprotection.json#L1139
`❌` ResourceNameRestriction	The resource name parameter 'vaultName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction. Location: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2023-01-01/dataprotection.json#L1205
`❌` ResourceNameRestriction	The resource name parameter 'backupInstanceName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction. Location: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2023-01-01/dataprotection.json#L1205
`❌` PostOperationAsyncResponseValidation	An async POST operation must set long running operation options 'x-ms-long-running-operation-options' Location: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2023-01-01/dataprotection.json#L1206
`❌` ResourceNameRestriction	The resource name parameter 'vaultName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction. Location: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2023-01-01/dataprotection.json#L1281
`❌` PostOperationAsyncResponseValidation	An async POST operation must set long running operation options 'x-ms-long-running-operation-options' Location: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2023-01-01/dataprotection.json#L1282
`❌` ResourceNameRestriction	The resource name parameter 'vaultName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction. Location: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2023-01-01/dataprotection.json#L1354
`❌` ResourceNameRestriction	The resource name parameter 'backupInstanceName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction. Location: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2023-01-01/dataprotection.json#L1354
`❌` OperationIdNounVerb	Per the Noun_Verb convention for Operation Ids, the noun 'BackupInstances' should not appear after the underscore. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change. Location: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2023-01-01/dataprotection.json#L1360
`❌` GetOperation200	The get operation should only return 200. Location: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2023-01-01/dataprotection.json#L1394
`❌` LroLocationHeader	A 202 response should include an Location response header. Location: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2023-01-01/dataprotection.json#L1394
`❌` ResourceNameRestriction	The resource name parameter 'vaultName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction. Location: Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2023-01-01/dataprotection.json#L1411

️️✔️Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passes for Avocado.

️️✔️ApiReadinessCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

️❌~[Staging] ServiceAPIReadinessTest: 38 Errors, 0 Warnings failed [Detail]

Tag package-2023-01; Prod region: Deployed

Test run on region: westcentralus; Operation coverage: total: 66, untested: 0, failed: 31, passed: 35

Service API Readiness Test failed. Check pipeline artifact for detail report.

Only 30 items are listed, please refer to log for more details.

Rule	Message
`❌` CLIENT_ERROR	statusCode: 400, errorCode: UserErrorInvalidRequestParameter, errorMessage: Parameter PolicyName in request is invalid Source: runtime OperationId: BackupInstances_CreateOrUpdate
`❌` CLIENT_ERROR	statusCode: 400, errorCode: BMSUserErrorInvalidInput, errorMessage: Input provided for the call is invalid Source: runtime OperationId: BackupInstances_GetBackupInstanceOperationResult
`❌` CLIENT_ERROR	statusCode: 404, errorCode: UserErrorGenericResourceNotFound, errorMessage: Azure resource does not exist. Please make sure required resources exist. If the issue persists, contact Microsoft support. Source: runtime OperationId: BackupInstances_Get
`❌` OBJECT_ADDITIONAL_PROPERTIES	Additional properties not allowed: innerError Source: response OperationId: BackupInstances_Get
`❌` CLIENT_ERROR	statusCode: 400, errorCode: UserErrorInvalidRequestParameter, errorMessage: Parameter BackupInstance in request is invalid Source: runtime OperationId: BackupInstances_AdhocBackup
`❌` CLIENT_ERROR	statusCode: 403, errorCode: LinkedAuthorizationFailed, errorMessage: The client '7904a8be-825f-480e-a728-80a70579dba4' with object id '7904a8be-825f-480e-a728-80a70579dba4' has permission to perform action 'Microsoft.DataProtection/backupVaults/backupInstances/validateRestore/action' on scope '/subscriptions/db5eb68e-73e2-4fa8-b18a-46cd1be4cce5/resourceGroups/apiTest-fcBnEM-22574/providers/Microsoft.DataProtection/backupVaults/vaultnamns018o/backupInstances/backupinc4ohia'; however, it does not have permission to perform action 'read' on the linked scope(s) '/subscriptions/f75d8d8b-6735-4697-82e1-1a7a3ff0d5d4/resourceGroups/viveksipgtest/providers/Microsoft.DBforPostgreSQL/servers/viveksipgtest/databases/testdb' or the linked scope(s) are invalid. Source: runtime OperationId: BackupInstances_ValidateForRestore
`❌` CLIENT_ERROR	statusCode: 400, errorCode: UserErrorInvalidRequestParameter, errorMessage: Parameter BackupInstance in request is invalid Source: runtime OperationId: BackupInstances_SyncBackupInstance
`❌` CLIENT_ERROR	statusCode: 400, errorCode: UserErrorInvalidRequestParameter, errorMessage: Parameter BackupInstance in request is invalid Source: runtime OperationId: BackupInstances_SuspendBackups
`❌` CLIENT_ERROR	statusCode: 400, errorCode: UserErrorInvalidRequestParameter, errorMessage: Parameter BackupInstance in request is invalid Source: runtime OperationId: BackupInstances_StopProtection
`❌` CLIENT_ERROR	statusCode: 400, errorCode: UserErrorInvalidRequestParameter, errorMessage: Parameter BackupInstance in request is invalid Source: runtime OperationId: BackupInstances_ResumeBackups
`❌` CLIENT_ERROR	statusCode: 400, errorCode: UserErrorInvalidRequestParameter, errorMessage: Parameter BackupInstance in request is invalid Source: runtime OperationId: BackupInstances_ResumeProtection
`❌` CLIENT_ERROR	statusCode: 403, errorCode: LinkedAuthorizationFailed, errorMessage: The client '7904a8be-825f-480e-a728-80a70579dba4' with object id '7904a8be-825f-480e-a728-80a70579dba4' has permission to perform action 'Microsoft.DataProtection/backupVaults/backupInstances/restore/action' on scope '/subscriptions/db5eb68e-73e2-4fa8-b18a-46cd1be4cce5/resourceGroups/apiTest-fcBnEM-22574/providers/Microsoft.DataProtection/backupVaults/vaultnamns018o/backupInstances/backupinc4ohia'; however, it does not have permission to perform action 'read' on the linked scope(s) '/subscriptions/f75d8d8b-6735-4697-82e1-1a7a3ff0d5d4/resourceGroups/viveksipgtest/providers/Microsoft.DBforPostgreSQL/servers/viveksipgtest/databases/testdb' or the linked scope(s) are invalid. Source: runtime OperationId: BackupInstances_TriggerRestore
`❌` CLIENT_ERROR	statusCode: 403, errorCode: LinkedAuthorizationFailed, errorMessage: The client '7904a8be-825f-480e-a728-80a70579dba4' with object id '7904a8be-825f-480e-a728-80a70579dba4' has permission to perform action 'Microsoft.DataProtection/backupVaults/validateForBackup/action' on scope '/subscriptions/db5eb68e-73e2-4fa8-b18a-46cd1be4cce5/resourceGroups/apiTest-fcBnEM-22574/providers/Microsoft.DataProtection/backupVaults/vaultnamns018o'; however, it does not have permission to perform action 'read' on the linked scope(s) '/subscriptions/f75d8d8b-6735-4697-82e1-1a7a3ff0d5d4/resourceGroups/viveksipgtest/providers/Microsoft.DBforPostgreSQL/servers/viveksipgtest' or the linked scope(s) are invalid. Source: runtime OperationId: BackupInstances_ValidateForBackup
`❌` SERVER_ERROR	statusCode: 500, errorCode: CloudInternalError, errorMessage: Microsoft Azure Backup encountered an internal error. Wait for a few minutes and then try the operation again. If the issue persists, please contact Microsoft support. Source: runtime OperationId: BackupInstances_TriggerRehydrate
`❌` OBJECT_ADDITIONAL_PROPERTIES	Additional properties not allowed: innerError Source: response OperationId: BackupInstances_TriggerRehydrate
`❌` CLIENT_ERROR	statusCode: 400, errorCode: BMSUserErrorResourceGuardResourceDoesntExist, errorMessage: ResourceGuard resource doesn't exist. Source: runtime OperationId: DppResourceGuardProxy_CreateOrUpdate
`❌` CLIENT_ERROR	statusCode: 404, errorCode: undefined, errorMessage: undefined Source: runtime OperationId: DppResourceGuardProxy_Get
`❌` CLIENT_ERROR	statusCode: 403, errorCode: LinkedAuthorizationFailed, errorMessage: The client has permission to perform action 'Microsoft.DataProtection/resourceGuards/deleteBackupInstanceRequests/approve/action' on scope '/subscriptions/db5eb68e-73e2-4fa8-b18a-46cd1be4cce5/resourceGroups/apiTest-fcBnEM-22574/providers/Microsoft.DataProtection/backupVaults/vaultnamns018o/backupResourceGuardProxies/resourcedpwbjm', however the linked subscription 'f9e67185-f313-4e79-aa71-6458d429369d' was not found. Source: runtime OperationId: DppResourceGuardProxy_UnlockDelete
`❌` CLIENT_ERROR	statusCode: 400, errorCode: UserErrorInvalidRequestParameter, errorMessage: Parameter DataSourceType in request is invalid Source: runtime OperationId: BackupPolicies_CreateOrUpdate
`❌` CLIENT_ERROR	statusCode: 404, errorCode: UserErrorGenericResourceNotFound, errorMessage: Azure resource does not exist. Please make sure required resources exist. If the issue persists, contact Microsoft support. Source: runtime OperationId: BackupPolicies_Get
`❌` OBJECT_ADDITIONAL_PROPERTIES	Additional properties not allowed: innerError Source: response OperationId: BackupPolicies_Get
`❌` CLIENT_ERROR	statusCode: 403, errorCode: AuthorizationFailed, errorMessage: The client '7904a8be-825f-480e-a728-80a70579dba4' with object id '7904a8be-825f-480e-a728-80a70579dba4' does not have authorization to perform action 'Microsoft.DataProtection/locations/checkFeatureSupport/action' over scope '/subscriptions/db5eb68e-73e2-4fa8-b18a-46cd1be4cce5' or the scope is invalid. If access was recently granted, please refresh your credentials. Source: runtime OperationId: DataProtection_CheckFeatureSupport
`❌` CLIENT_ERROR	statusCode: 400, errorCode: BMSUserErrorInvalidInput, errorMessage: Input provided for the call is invalid Source: runtime OperationId: OperationResult_Get
`❌` CLIENT_ERROR	statusCode: 400, errorCode: BMSUserErrorInvalidInput, errorMessage: Input provided for the call is invalid Source: runtime OperationId: OperationStatus_Get
`❌` CLIENT_ERROR	statusCode: 400, errorCode: UserErrorInvalidRequestParameter, errorMessage: Parameter backupInstanceName in request is invalid Source: runtime OperationId: RestorableTimeRanges_Find
`❌` CLIENT_ERROR	statusCode: 404, errorCode: undefined, errorMessage: undefined Source: runtime OperationId: RecoveryPoints_List
`❌` OBJECT_ADDITIONAL_PROPERTIES	Additional properties not allowed: value Source: response OperationId: RecoveryPoints_List
`❌` CLIENT_ERROR	statusCode: 404, errorCode: UserErrorGenericResourceNotFound, errorMessage: Azure resource does not exist. Please make sure required resources exist. If the issue persists, contact Microsoft support. Source: runtime OperationId: RecoveryPoints_Get
`❌` OBJECT_ADDITIONAL_PROPERTIES	Additional properties not allowed: innerError Source: response OperationId: RecoveryPoints_Get
`❌` SERVER_ERROR	statusCode: 500, errorCode: CloudInternalError, errorMessage: Microsoft Azure Backup encountered an internal error. Source: runtime OperationId: ExportJobsOperationResult_Get

️️✔️SwaggerAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

️️✔️CadlAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passes for ModelValidation.

️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passes for SemanticValidation.

️️✔️PoliCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passed for PoliCheck.

️️✔️PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passes for PrettierCheck.

️️✔️SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passes for SpellCheck.

️️✔️Lint(RPaaS) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passes for Lint(RPaaS).

️️✔️CadlValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passes for CadlValidation.

️️✔️PR Summary succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passes for Summary.

_{Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?}

openapi-pipeline-app · 2023-02-13T07:52:27Z

Swagger Generation Artifacts

️️✔️ApiDocPreview succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

 Please click here to preview with your @microsoft account.

️️✔️SDK Breaking Change Tracking succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Breaking Changes Tracking

️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-net-track2 succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from 9cfdd25. SDK Automation 14.0.0

command	pwsh ./eng/scripts/Automation-Sdk-Init.ps1 ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/initOutput.json
command	pwsh ./eng/scripts/Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1 ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/generateOutput.json

️✔️Azure.ResourceManager.DataProtectionBackup [View full logs] [Release SDK Changes]
- Azure.ResourceManager.DataProtectionBackup.1.2.0-alpha.20230225.1.nupkg
```
info	[Changelog]
```

️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-python-track2 warning [Detail]

⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from 9cfdd25. SDK Automation 14.0.0

command	sh scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initOutput.json
cmderr	[automation_init.sh] WARNING: Skipping azure-nspkg as it is not installed.
command	sh scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateOutput.json
cmderr	[automation_generate.sh]
cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice New major version of npm available! 8.19.3 -> 9.5.1
cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice Changelog: <https://github.com/npm/cli/releases/tag/v9.5.1>
cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice Run `npm install -g [email protected]` to update!
cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice

️✔️track2_azure-mgmt-dataprotection [View full logs] [Release SDK Changes]
- azure_mgmt_dataprotection-1.0.0b1-py3-none-any.whl
- azure-mgmt-dataprotection-1.0.0b1.zip
```
info	[Changelog] ### Features Added
info	[Changelog]
info	[Changelog]   - Added operation group DppResourceGuardProxyOperations
```

️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-java succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from 9cfdd25. SDK Automation 14.0.0

command	./eng/mgmt/automation/init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/initOutput.json
command	./eng/mgmt/automation/generate.py ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/generateOutput.json

️✔️azure-resourcemanager-dataprotection [View full logs] [Release SDK Changes]

️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-go succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from 9cfdd25. SDK Automation 14.0.0

command	sh ./eng/scripts/automation_init.sh ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initOutput.json
command	generator automation-v2 ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateOutput.json

️✔️sdk/resourcemanager/dataprotection/armdataprotection [View full logs] [Release SDK Changes]

info	[Changelog] ### Features Added
info	[Changelog]
info	[Changelog] - New function `NewDppResourceGuardProxyClient(string, azcore.TokenCredential, *arm.ClientOptions) (*DppResourceGuardProxyClient, error)`
info	[Changelog] - New function `*DppResourceGuardProxyClient.CreateOrUpdate(context.Context, string, string, string, ResourceGuardProxyBaseResource, *DppResourceGuardProxyClientCreateOrUpdateOptions) (DppResourceGuardProxyClientCreateOrUpdateResponse, error)`
info	[Changelog] - New function `*DppResourceGuardProxyClient.Delete(context.Context, string, string, string, *DppResourceGuardProxyClientDeleteOptions) (DppResourceGuardProxyClientDeleteResponse, error)`
info	[Changelog] - New function `*DppResourceGuardProxyClient.Get(context.Context, string, string, string, *DppResourceGuardProxyClientGetOptions) (DppResourceGuardProxyClientGetResponse, error)`
info	[Changelog] - New function `*DppResourceGuardProxyClient.NewListPager(string, string, *DppResourceGuardProxyClientListOptions) *runtime.Pager[DppResourceGuardProxyClientListResponse]`
info	[Changelog] - New function `*DppResourceGuardProxyClient.UnlockDelete(context.Context, string, string, string, UnlockDeleteRequest, *DppResourceGuardProxyClientUnlockDeleteOptions) (DppResourceGuardProxyClientUnlockDeleteResponse, error)`
info	[Changelog] - New struct `DppResourceGuardProxyClient`
info	[Changelog] - New struct `ResourceGuardOperationDetail`
info	[Changelog] - New struct `ResourceGuardProxyBase`
info	[Changelog] - New struct `ResourceGuardProxyBaseResource`
info	[Changelog] - New struct `ResourceGuardProxyBaseResourceList`
info	[Changelog] - New struct `UnlockDeleteRequest`
info	[Changelog] - New struct `UnlockDeleteResponse`
info	[Changelog]
info	[Changelog] Total 0 breaking change(s), 20 additive change(s).

️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-js succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from 9cfdd25. SDK Automation 14.0.0

command	sh .scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initOutput.json
warn	File azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initOutput.json not found to read
command	sh .scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/generateOutput.json

️✔️@azure/arm-dataprotection [View full logs] [Release SDK Changes]
- azure-arm-dataprotection-1.0.0.tgz
```
info	[Changelog]
error	breakingChangeTracking is enabled, but version or changelogItem is not found in output.
```

️❌ azure-powershell failed [Detail]

❌Failed [Logs]Release - Generate from 9cfdd25. SDK Automation 14.0.0

command	sh ./tools/SwaggerCI/init.sh ../azure-powershell_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-powershell_tmp/initOutput.json
command	pwsh ./tools/SwaggerCI/psci.ps1 ../azure-powershell_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-powershell_tmp/generateOutput.json

❌Az.dataprotection [View full logs] [Release SDK Changes]

_{Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?}

openapi-pipeline-app · 2023-02-13T07:52:28Z

Generated ApiView

Language	Package Name	ApiView Link
Go	sdk/resourcemanager/dataprotection/armdataprotection	https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/32c4c3749f39442ba99a51d857d803f2
Java	azure-resourcemanager-dataprotection	https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/288cc7fdca3d4fb7917eacde574b64ef
.Net	Azure.ResourceManager.DataProtectionBackup	https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/96e46488aae84cc49c630f01f4e1f1ab
JavaScript	@azure/arm-dataprotection	https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/8a5e20247ccb447e8954ddf72b490b21

xiaoxuqi-ms · 2023-02-13T09:00:54Z

Please DO NOT delete the first comment or the labels can not be added properly.

openapi-workflow-bot · 2023-02-14T06:56:17Z

Hi @Charan000, Your PR has some issues. Please fix the CI sequentially by following the order of Avocado, semantic validation, model validation, breaking change, lintDiff. If you have any questions, please post your questions in this channel https://aka.ms/swaggersupport.

Task	How to fix	Priority
Avocado	Fix-Avocado	High
Semantic validation	Fix-SemanticValidation-Error	High
Model validation	Fix-ModelValidation-Error	High
LintDiff	Fix-LintDiff	high

If you need further help, please feedback via swagger feedback.

openapi-workflow-bot · 2023-02-14T06:56:18Z

NewApiVersionRequired reason:

A service’s API is a contract with customers and is represented by using the api-version query parameter. Changes such as adding an optional property to a request/response or introducing a new operation is a change to the service’s contract and therefore requires a new api-version value. This is critically important for documentation, client libraries, and customer support.

EXAMPLE: if a customer calls a service in the public cloud using api-version=2020-07-27, the new property or operation may exist but if they call the service in a government cloud, air-gapped cloud, or Azure Stack Hub cloud using the same api-version, the property or operation may not exist. Because there is no clear relationship between the service api-version and the new property/operation, customers can’t trust the documentation and Azure customer have difficulty helping customers diagnose issues. In addition, each client library version documents the service version it supports. When an optional property or new operation is added to a service and its Swagger, new client libraries must be produced to expose this functionality to customers. Without updating the api-version, it is unclear to customers which version of a client library supports these new features.

xiaoxuqi-ms · 2023-02-15T02:36:12Z

/azp run

azure-pipelines · 2023-02-15T02:36:22Z

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

xiaoxuqi-ms · 2023-02-16T02:48:49Z

Confirmed with @Charan000 , owner of "vaultName" will fix the linter issue.
@tadelesh and @msyyc ,could you kindly help to review the SDK breaking change?

msyyc · 2023-02-16T03:30:55Z

/azp run

azure-pipelines · 2023-02-16T03:31:09Z

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

xiaoxuqi-ms · 2023-02-20T03:02:48Z

/azp run

azure-pipelines · 2023-02-20T03:02:57Z

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

leni-msft · 2023-02-20T10:54:59Z

/azp run

azure-pipelines · 2023-02-20T10:55:09Z

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

adding change to newer version ResourceGuardProxy APIs and example fixing parameter refs fixing refs incorrect ref fixes pattern for resourceGuardProxyName param semantic fixes

xiaoxuqi-ms · 2023-02-25T02:37:18Z

This version in staging right now and service team aren't adding a whole new API version. They plan to add it later.

…ble version (Azure#22574) * manual swagger fix adding change to newer version ResourceGuardProxy APIs and example fixing parameter refs fixing refs incorrect ref fixes pattern for resourceGuardProxyName param semantic fixes * warning fixes --------- Co-authored-by: Charan MVS <[email protected]>

openapi-assignment-bot bot assigned xiaoxuqi-ms Feb 13, 2023

azure-sdk mentioned this pull request Feb 13, 2023

[AutoPR Az.dataprotection] Adding ResourceGuardProxy APIs to Microsoft.Dataprotection latest stable version azure-sdk/azure-powershell#4269

Closed

AzureRestAPISpecReview added ARMReview CI-FixRequiredOnFailure NewApiVersionRequired resource-manager WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required labels Feb 14, 2023

azure-sdk mentioned this pull request Feb 14, 2023

[AutoPR sdk/resourcemanager/dataprotection/armdataprotection] Adding ResourceGuardProxy APIs to Microsoft.Dataprotection latest stable version azure-sdk/azure-sdk-for-go#4384

Closed

openapi-pipeline-app bot added the CI-BreakingChange-Go label Feb 14, 2023

azure-sdk mentioned this pull request Feb 14, 2023

[AutoPR track2_azure-mgmt-dataprotection] Adding ResourceGuardProxy APIs to Microsoft.Dataprotection latest stable version azure-sdk/azure-sdk-for-python#2755

Closed

openapi-pipeline-app bot added the CI-BreakingChange-Python-Track2 label Feb 14, 2023

azure-sdk mentioned this pull request Feb 14, 2023

[AutoPR @azure/arm-dataprotection] Adding ResourceGuardProxy APIs to Microsoft.Dataprotection latest stable version azure-sdk/azure-sdk-for-js#3871

Closed

mikekistler added the Approved-BreakingChange DO NOT USE! OBSOLETE label. See https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-tools/issues/6374 label Feb 15, 2023

xiaoxuqi-ms added the Approved-LintDiff label Feb 16, 2023

tadelesh added the Approved-SdkBreakingChange-Go Approve the breaking change tracking for azure-sdk-for-go label Feb 16, 2023

msyyc added the Approved-SdkBreakingChange-Python label Feb 16, 2023

rkmanda added the ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review label Feb 18, 2023

openapi-workflow-bot bot removed the WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required label Feb 18, 2023

xiaoxuqi-ms approved these changes Feb 20, 2023

View reviewed changes

leni-msft added the ReadyForApiTest <valid label in PR review process>add this label when swagger and service APIs are ready for test label Feb 20, 2023

manual swagger fix

e8a989c

adding change to newer version ResourceGuardProxy APIs and example fixing parameter refs fixing refs incorrect ref fixes pattern for resourceGuardProxyName param semantic fixes

hiaga force-pushed the main branch from 78c0c32 to e8a989c Compare February 23, 2023 08:22

leni-msft approved these changes Feb 23, 2023

View reviewed changes

warning fixes

96d6481

xiaoxuqi-ms merged commit 9cfdd25 into Azure:main Feb 25, 2023

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Adding ResourceGuardProxy APIs to Microsoft.Dataprotection latest stable version #22574

Adding ResourceGuardProxy APIs to Microsoft.Dataprotection latest stable version #22574

Charan000 commented Feb 13, 2023 •

edited

Loading

openapi-workflow-bot bot commented Feb 13, 2023

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Feb 13, 2023 •

edited

Loading

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Feb 13, 2023 •

edited

Loading

Breaking Changes Tracking

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Feb 13, 2023 •

edited

Loading

xiaoxuqi-ms commented Feb 13, 2023

openapi-workflow-bot bot commented Feb 14, 2023

openapi-workflow-bot bot commented Feb 14, 2023

xiaoxuqi-ms commented Feb 15, 2023

azure-pipelines bot commented Feb 15, 2023

xiaoxuqi-ms commented Feb 16, 2023

msyyc commented Feb 16, 2023

azure-pipelines bot commented Feb 16, 2023

xiaoxuqi-ms commented Feb 20, 2023

azure-pipelines bot commented Feb 20, 2023

leni-msft commented Feb 20, 2023

azure-pipelines bot commented Feb 20, 2023

xiaoxuqi-ms commented Feb 25, 2023

Adding ResourceGuardProxy APIs to Microsoft.Dataprotection latest stable version #22574

Adding ResourceGuardProxy APIs to Microsoft.Dataprotection latest stable version #22574

Conversation

Charan000 commented Feb 13, 2023 • edited Loading

ARM API Information (Control Plane)

Changelog

Contribution checklist (MS Employees Only):

ARM API Review Checklist

Breaking Change Review Checklist

openapi-workflow-bot bot commented Feb 13, 2023

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Feb 13, 2023 • edited Loading

Swagger Validation Report

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Feb 13, 2023 • edited Loading

Swagger Generation Artifacts

Breaking Changes Tracking

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Feb 13, 2023 • edited Loading

Generated ApiView

xiaoxuqi-ms commented Feb 13, 2023

openapi-workflow-bot bot commented Feb 14, 2023

openapi-workflow-bot bot commented Feb 14, 2023

xiaoxuqi-ms commented Feb 15, 2023

azure-pipelines bot commented Feb 15, 2023

xiaoxuqi-ms commented Feb 16, 2023

msyyc commented Feb 16, 2023

azure-pipelines bot commented Feb 16, 2023

xiaoxuqi-ms commented Feb 20, 2023

azure-pipelines bot commented Feb 20, 2023

leni-msft commented Feb 20, 2023

azure-pipelines bot commented Feb 20, 2023

xiaoxuqi-ms commented Feb 25, 2023

Charan000 commented Feb 13, 2023 •

edited

Loading

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Feb 13, 2023 •

edited

Loading

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Feb 13, 2023 •

edited

Loading

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Feb 13, 2023 •

edited

Loading