-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Redis Cache] New API Version 2022-06-01 with some extra linked server properties added for server role update/failover support #20869
[Redis Cache] New API Version 2022-06-01 with some extra linked server properties added for server role update/failover support #20869
Conversation
Hi, @rohanand-MS Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips. Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. [email protected] |
Swagger Validation Report
|
compared swaggers (via Oad v0.9.7)] | new version | base version |
---|---|---|
redis.json | 2022-06-01(d75799d) | 2022-05-01(main) |
redis.json | 2022-06-01(d75799d) | 2019-07-01(main) |
The following breaking changes are detected by comparison with the latest preview version:
Rule | Message |
---|---|
The new version is missing a path that was found in the old version. Was path '/subscriptions/{subscriptionId}/resourceGroups/{resourceGroupName}/providers/Microsoft.Cache/Redis/{name}/listUpgradeNotifications' removed or restructured? Old: Microsoft.Cache/preview/2019-07-01/redis.json#L103:5 |
|
The new version is missing a path that was found in the old version. Was path '/subscriptions/{subscriptionId}/resourceGroups/{resourceGroupName}/providers/Microsoft.Cache/Redis/{name}' removed or restructured? Old: Microsoft.Cache/preview/2019-07-01/redis.json#L155:5 |
|
The new version is missing a path that was found in the old version. Was path '/subscriptions/{subscriptionId}/resourceGroups/{resourceGroupName}/providers/Microsoft.Cache/Redis' removed or restructured? Old: Microsoft.Cache/preview/2019-07-01/redis.json#L354:5 |
|
The new version is missing a path that was found in the old version. Was path '/subscriptions/{subscriptionId}/providers/Microsoft.Cache/Redis' removed or restructured? Old: Microsoft.Cache/preview/2019-07-01/redis.json#L394:5 |
|
The new version is missing a path that was found in the old version. Was path '/subscriptions/{subscriptionId}/resourceGroups/{resourceGroupName}/providers/Microsoft.Cache/Redis/{name}/listKeys' removed or restructured? Old: Microsoft.Cache/preview/2019-07-01/redis.json#L427:5 |
|
The new version is missing a path that was found in the old version. Was path '/subscriptions/{subscriptionId}/resourceGroups/{resourceGroupName}/providers/Microsoft.Cache/Redis/{name}/regenerateKey' removed or restructured? Old: Microsoft.Cache/preview/2019-07-01/redis.json#L471:5 |
|
The new version is missing a path that was found in the old version. Was path '/subscriptions/{subscriptionId}/resourceGroups/{resourceGroupName}/providers/Microsoft.Cache/Redis/{name}/forceReboot' removed or restructured? Old: Microsoft.Cache/preview/2019-07-01/redis.json#L524:5 |
|
The new version is missing a path that was found in the old version. Was path '/subscriptions/{subscriptionId}/resourceGroups/{resourceGroupName}/providers/Microsoft.Cache/Redis/{name}/import' removed or restructured? Old: Microsoft.Cache/preview/2019-07-01/redis.json#L577:5 |
|
The new version is missing a path that was found in the old version. Was path '/subscriptions/{subscriptionId}/resourceGroups/{resourceGroupName}/providers/Microsoft.Cache/Redis/{name}/export' removed or restructured? Old: Microsoft.Cache/preview/2019-07-01/redis.json#L634:5 |
|
The new version is missing a path that was found in the old version. Was path '/subscriptions/{subscriptionId}/resourceGroups/{resourceGroupName}/providers/Microsoft.Cache/Redis/{cacheName}/firewallRules' removed or restructured? Old: Microsoft.Cache/preview/2019-07-01/redis.json#L691:5 |
|
The new version is missing a path that was found in the old version. Was path '/subscriptions/{subscriptionId}/resourceGroups/{resourceGroupName}/providers/Microsoft.Cache/Redis/{cacheName}/firewallRules/{ruleName}' removed or restructured? Old: Microsoft.Cache/preview/2019-07-01/redis.json#L739:5 |
|
The new version is missing a path that was found in the old version. Was path '/subscriptions/{subscriptionId}/resourceGroups/{resourceGroupName}/providers/Microsoft.Cache/Redis/{cacheName}/patchSchedules' removed or restructured? Old: Microsoft.Cache/preview/2019-07-01/redis.json#L906:5 |
|
The new version is missing a path that was found in the old version. Was path '/subscriptions/{subscriptionId}/resourceGroups/{resourceGroupName}/providers/Microsoft.Cache/Redis/{name}/patchSchedules/{default}' removed or restructured? Old: Microsoft.Cache/preview/2019-07-01/redis.json#L954:5 |
|
The new version is missing a path that was found in the old version. Was path '/subscriptions/{subscriptionId}/resourceGroups/{resourceGroupName}/providers/Microsoft.Cache/Redis/{name}/linkedServers/{linkedServerName}' removed or restructured? Old: Microsoft.Cache/preview/2019-07-01/redis.json#L1142:5 |
|
The new version is missing a path that was found in the old version. Was path '/subscriptions/{subscriptionId}/resourceGroups/{resourceGroupName}/providers/Microsoft.Cache/Redis/{name}/linkedServers' removed or restructured? Old: Microsoft.Cache/preview/2019-07-01/redis.json#L1304:5 |
|
The new version adds a response code 'default'. New: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2022-06-01/redis.json#L61:11 |
|
The new version adds a response code 'default'. New: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2022-06-01/redis.json#L106:11 |
|
The new version has a different type '' than the previous one 'string'. New: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2022-06-01/redis.json#L1969:11 Old: Microsoft.Cache/preview/2019-07-01/redis.json#L1397:11 |
|
The new version has a different type '' than the previous one 'string'. New: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2022-06-01/redis.json#L1969:11 Old: Microsoft.Cache/preview/2019-07-01/redis.json#L1397:11 |
|
The new version has a different type '' than the previous one 'string'. New: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2022-06-01/redis.json#L1969:11 Old: Microsoft.Cache/preview/2019-07-01/redis.json#L1397:11 |
|
The new version has a different type '' than the previous one 'string'. New: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2022-06-01/redis.json#L1969:11 Old: Microsoft.Cache/preview/2019-07-01/redis.json#L1397:11 |
|
The new version has a different default value than the previous one. New: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2022-06-01/redis.json#L1976:9 Old: Microsoft.Cache/preview/2019-07-01/redis.json#L1402:9 |
|
The new version has a different default value than the previous one. New: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2022-06-01/redis.json#L1976:9 Old: Microsoft.Cache/preview/2019-07-01/redis.json#L1402:9 |
|
The new version has a different default value than the previous one. New: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2022-06-01/redis.json#L1976:9 Old: Microsoft.Cache/preview/2019-07-01/redis.json#L1402:9 |
|
The new version has a different default value than the previous one. New: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2022-06-01/redis.json#L1976:9 Old: Microsoft.Cache/preview/2019-07-01/redis.json#L1402:9 |
|
The read only property has changed from 'true' to 'false'. New: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2022-06-01/redis.json#L1972:9 Old: Microsoft.Cache/preview/2019-07-01/redis.json#L1485:9 |
|
The new version has a different 'allOf' property than the previous one. New: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2022-06-01/redis.json#L2257:5 Old: Microsoft.Cache/preview/2019-07-01/redis.json#L1708:5 |
️️✔️
CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There is no credential detected.
️⚠️
LintDiff: 0 Warnings warning [Detail]
compared tags (via openapi-validator v1.13.0) | new version | base version |
---|---|---|
package-2022-06 | package-2022-06(d75799d) | default(main) |
The following errors/warnings exist before current PR submission:
Only 30 items are listed, please refer to log for more details.
Rule | Message |
---|---|
R3021 - PathResourceTypeNameCamelCase |
Resource type naming must follow camel case. Path: '/subscriptions/{subscriptionId}/providers/Microsoft.Cache/CheckNameAvailability' Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2022-06-01/redis.json#L73 |
R4013 - IntegerTypeMustHaveFormat |
The integer type does not have a format, please add it. Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2022-06-01/redis.json#L2425 |
R4018 - OperationsApiResponseSchema |
The response schema of operations API '/providers/Microsoft.Cache/operations' does not match the ARM specification. Please standardize the schema. Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2022-06-01/redis.json#L37 |
R4037 - MissingTypeObject |
The schema 'Sku' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2022-06-01/redis.json#L1856 |
R4037 - MissingTypeObject |
The schema 'RedisCommonProperties' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2022-06-01/redis.json#L1896 |
R4037 - MissingTypeObject |
The schema 'RedisCreateProperties' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2022-06-01/redis.json#L2033 |
R4037 - MissingTypeObject |
The schema 'RedisUpdateProperties' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2022-06-01/redis.json#L2065 |
R4037 - MissingTypeObject |
The schema 'RedisProperties' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2022-06-01/redis.json#L2080 |
R4037 - MissingTypeObject |
The schema 'RedisCreateParameters' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2022-06-01/redis.json#L2163 |
R4037 - MissingTypeObject |
The schema 'RedisUpdateParameters' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2022-06-01/redis.json#L2203 |
R4037 - MissingTypeObject |
The schema 'RedisAccessKeys' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2022-06-01/redis.json#L2224 |
R4037 - MissingTypeObject |
The schema 'RedisFirewallRule' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2022-06-01/redis.json#L2239 |
R4037 - MissingTypeObject |
The schema 'RedisFirewallRuleProperties' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2022-06-01/redis.json#L2265 |
R4037 - MissingTypeObject |
The schema 'RedisFirewallRuleListResult' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2022-06-01/redis.json#L2282 |
R4037 - MissingTypeObject |
The schema 'RedisResource' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2022-06-01/redis.json#L2299 |
R4037 - MissingTypeObject |
The schema 'RedisInstanceDetails' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2022-06-01/redis.json#L2328 |
R4037 - MissingTypeObject |
The schema 'RedisListResult' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2022-06-01/redis.json#L2366 |
R4037 - MissingTypeObject |
The schema 'RedisRegenerateKeyParameters' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2022-06-01/redis.json#L2383 |
R4037 - MissingTypeObject |
The schema 'RedisRebootParameters' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2022-06-01/redis.json#L2403 |
R4037 - MissingTypeObject |
The schema 'ExportRDBParameters' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2022-06-01/redis.json#L2433 |
R4037 - MissingTypeObject |
The schema 'ImportRDBParameters' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2022-06-01/redis.json#L2458 |
R4037 - MissingTypeObject |
The schema 'ScheduleEntry' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2022-06-01/redis.json#L2481 |
R4037 - MissingTypeObject |
The schema 'ScheduleEntries' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2022-06-01/redis.json#L2519 |
R4037 - MissingTypeObject |
The schema 'RedisPatchSchedule' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2022-06-01/redis.json#L2536 |
R4037 - MissingTypeObject |
The schema 'RedisPatchScheduleListResult' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2022-06-01/redis.json#L2559 |
R4037 - MissingTypeObject |
The schema 'RedisForceRebootResponse' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2022-06-01/redis.json#L2576 |
R4037 - MissingTypeObject |
The schema 'RedisLinkedServer' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2022-06-01/redis.json#L2586 |
R4037 - MissingTypeObject |
The schema 'RedisLinkedServerWithProperties' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2022-06-01/redis.json#L2596 |
R4037 - MissingTypeObject |
The schema 'RedisLinkedServerProperties' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2022-06-01/redis.json#L2611 |
R4037 - MissingTypeObject |
The schema 'RedisLinkedServerWithPropertiesList' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2022-06-01/redis.json#L2626 |
️️✔️
Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Avocado.
️️✔️
ApiReadinessCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
️❌
~[Staging] ServiceAPIReadinessTest: 55 Errors, 0 Warnings failed [Detail]
Tag package-2022-06; Prod region: Deployed
Test run on region: westcentralus; Operation coverage: total: 32, untested: 0, failed: 28, passed: 4
Service API Readiness Test failed. Check pipeline artifact for detail report.
Only 30 items are listed, please refer to log for more details.
Rule | Message |
---|---|
CLIENT_ERROR |
"statusCode: 400, errorCode: ResourceTypeNotSupportAvailabilityZones, errorMessage: The resource type 'Redis' does not support availability zones at location 'westcentralus' and api-version '2022-06-01'." |
ASSERTION_ERROR |
"expected response code to be 2XX but found 400" |
CLIENT_ERROR |
"statusCode: 404, errorCode: ResourceNotFound, errorMessage: The Resource 'Microsoft.Cache/Redis/nametbglli' under resource group 'apiTest-YTfwgB-20869' was not found. For more details please go to https://aka.ms/ARMResourceNotFoundFix" |
ASSERTION_ERROR |
"expected response code to be 2XX but found 404" |
CLIENT_ERROR |
"statusCode: 404, errorCode: ResourceNotFound, errorMessage: The Resource 'Microsoft.Cache/Redis/nametbglli' under resource group 'apiTest-YTfwgB-20869' was not found. For more details please go to https://aka.ms/ARMResourceNotFoundFix" |
ASSERTION_ERROR |
"expected response code to be 2XX but found 404" |
CLIENT_ERROR |
"statusCode: 404, errorCode: ResourceNotFound, errorMessage: The Resource 'Microsoft.Cache/Redis/nametbglli' under resource group 'apiTest-YTfwgB-20869' was not found. For more details please go to https://aka.ms/ARMResourceNotFoundFix" |
ASSERTION_ERROR |
"expected response code to be 2XX but found 404" |
CLIENT_ERROR |
"statusCode: 404, errorCode: ResourceNotFound, errorMessage: The Resource 'Microsoft.Cache/Redis/nametbglli' under resource group 'apiTest-YTfwgB-20869' was not found. For more details please go to https://aka.ms/ARMResourceNotFoundFix" |
ASSERTION_ERROR |
"expected response code to be 2XX but found 404" |
CLIENT_ERROR |
"statusCode: 404, errorCode: ResourceNotFound, errorMessage: The Resource 'Microsoft.Cache/Redis/nametbglli' under resource group 'apiTest-YTfwgB-20869' was not found. For more details please go to https://aka.ms/ARMResourceNotFoundFix" |
ASSERTION_ERROR |
"expected response code to be 2XX but found 404" |
CLIENT_ERROR |
"statusCode: 404, errorCode: ResourceNotFound, errorMessage: The Resource 'Microsoft.Cache/Redis/nametbglli' under resource group 'apiTest-YTfwgB-20869' was not found. For more details please go to https://aka.ms/ARMResourceNotFoundFix" |
ASSERTION_ERROR |
"expected response code to be 2XX but found 404" |
CLIENT_ERROR |
"statusCode: 404, errorCode: ResourceNotFound, errorMessage: The Resource 'Microsoft.Cache/Redis/nametbglli' under resource group 'apiTest-YTfwgB-20869' was not found. For more details please go to https://aka.ms/ARMResourceNotFoundFix" |
ASSERTION_ERROR |
"expected response code to be 2XX but found 404" |
CLIENT_ERROR |
"statusCode: 404, errorCode: ResourceNotFound, errorMessage: The Resource 'Microsoft.Cache/Redis/nametbglli' under resource group 'apiTest-YTfwgB-20869' was not found. For more details please go to https://aka.ms/ARMResourceNotFoundFix" |
ASSERTION_ERROR |
"expected response code to be 2XX but found 404" |
CLIENT_ERROR |
"statusCode: 404, errorCode: ResourceNotFound, errorMessage: The Resource 'Microsoft.Cache/Redis/nametbglli' under resource group 'apiTest-YTfwgB-20869' was not found. For more details please go to https://aka.ms/ARMResourceNotFoundFix" |
ASSERTION_ERROR |
"expected response code to be 2XX but found 404" |
CLIENT_ERROR |
"statusCode: 404, errorCode: ResourceNotFound, errorMessage: The Resource 'Microsoft.Cache/Redis/nametbglli' under resource group 'apiTest-YTfwgB-20869' was not found. For more details please go to https://aka.ms/ARMResourceNotFoundFix" |
ASSERTION_ERROR |
"expected response code to be 2XX but found 404" |
CLIENT_ERROR |
"statusCode: 404, errorCode: ResourceNotFound, errorMessage: The Resource 'Microsoft.Cache/Redis/nametbglli' under resource group 'apiTest-YTfwgB-20869' was not found. For more details please go to https://aka.ms/ARMResourceNotFoundFix" |
ASSERTION_ERROR |
"expected response code to be 2XX but found 404" |
CLIENT_ERROR |
"statusCode: 404, errorCode: ParentResourceNotFound, errorMessage: Can not perform requested operation on nested resource. Parent resource 'cachenamelww1ud' not found." |
ASSERTION_ERROR |
"expected response code to be 2XX but found 404" |
CLIENT_ERROR |
"statusCode: 404, errorCode: ParentResourceNotFound, errorMessage: Can not perform requested operation on nested resource. Parent resource 'cachenamelww1ud' not found." |
ASSERTION_ERROR |
"expected response code to be 2XX but found 404" |
CLIENT_ERROR |
"statusCode: 404, errorCode: ParentResourceNotFound, errorMessage: Can not perform requested operation on nested resource. Parent resource 'cachenamelww1ud' not found." |
ASSERTION_ERROR |
"expected response code to be 2XX but found 404" |
️⚠️
~[Staging] TrafficValidation: 1 Warnings warning [Detail]
restlerResult: Request coverage (successful / total): 4 / 32 Attempted requests: 12 / 32
Traffic validation failed. Check pipeline artifact for restler output and detail report.
Rule | Message |
---|---|
"Starting task Test...\nUsing python: 'python3' (Python 3.10.5)\nRequest coverage (successful / total): 4 / 32\nAttempted requests: 12 / 32\nNo bugs were found.\nTask Test succeeded.\nCollecting logs...\n" |
️️✔️
ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for ModelValidation.
️️✔️
SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
️️✔️
PoliCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passed for PoliCheck.
️❌
SDK Track2 Validation: 2 Errors, 0 Warnings failed [Detail]
- The following tags are being changed in this PR
- "https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs/blob/d75799db51854d9ec0ce692a80c8b31cfceb2009/specification/redis/resource-manager/readme.md#tag-package-2022-06">redis/resource-manager/readme.md#package-2022-06
Rule | Message |
---|---|
PreCheck/DuplicateSchema |
"readme":"redis/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2022-06", "details":"Duplicate Schema named 'ErrorDetail' (1 differences):\n - properties.details.$ref: "#/components/schemas/schemas:251" => "#/components/schemas/schemas:463"; This error can be temporarily avoided by using the 'modelerfour.lenient-model-deduplication' setting. NOTE: This setting will be removed in a future version of @autorest/modelerfour; schemas should be updated to fix this issue sooner than that." |
|
"readme":"redis/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2022-06", "details":"Error: 1 errors occured -- cannot continue." |
️️✔️
PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for PrettierCheck.
️️✔️
SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SpellCheck.
️️✔️
Lint(RPaaS) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Lint(RPaaS).
️️✔️
CadlValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for CadlValidation.
️️✔️
PR Summary succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Summary.
Swagger Generation Artifacts
|
Generated ApiView
|
Hi, @rohanand-MS your PR are labelled with WaitForARMFeedback. A notification email will be sent out shortly afterwards to notify ARM review board([email protected]). |
/azp run |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
specification/redis/resource-manager/Microsoft.Cache/stable/2022-06-01/redis.json
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
specification/redis/resource-manager/Microsoft.Cache/stable/2022-06-01/redis.json
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
specification/redis/resource-manager/Microsoft.Cache/stable/2022-06-01/redis.json
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Hi @rohanand-MS, one or multiple breaking change(s) is detected in your PR. Please check out the breaking change(s), and provide business justification in the PR comment and @ PR assignee why you must have these change(s), and how external customer impact can be mitigated. Please ensure to follow breaking change policy to request breaking change review and approval before proceeding swagger PR review. |
@rohanand-MS I see the PR #20348 just got merged and adds a new 'latest stable version'. It would probably be good to redo your PR based on the new latest stable version. |
@TimLovellSmith 2022-05-01 Stable version was already existing and the newer api version 2022-06-01 in current PR is based on top of it only. The latest merged PR has a one line description update for rdb-backup-frequency which I have incorporated in the newer version as well. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, thanks for iterating on this!
@ArcturusZhang Please help in the merge of this PR. |
…extra linked server properties added for server role update/failover support (#2584) Create to sync Azure/azure-rest-api-specs#20869 [ReCreate this PR](https://github.com/azure-resource-manager-schemas/compare/main...azure-sdk:sdkAuto/redis?expand=1)
This is a PR generated at OpenAPI Hub. You can view your work branch via this link.
ARM API Information (Control Plane)
Azure 1st Party Service can try out the Shift Left experience to initiate API design review from ADO code repo. If you are interested, may request engineering support by filling in with the form https://aka.ms/ShiftLeftSupportForm.
Changelog
Add a changelog entry for this PR by answering the following questions:
Contribution checklist (MS Employees Only):
If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.
ARM API Review Checklist
Otherwise your PR may be subject to ARM review requirements. Complete the following:
Check this box if any of the following apply to the PR so that the label "ARMReview" and "WaitForARMFeedback" will be added by bot to kick off ARM API Review. Missing to check this box in the following scenario may result in delays to the ARM manifest review and deployment.
-[ ] To review changes efficiently, ensure you copy the existing version into the new directory structure for first commit and then push new changes, including version updates, in separate commits. You can use OpenAPIHub to initialize the PR for adding a new version. For more details refer to the wiki.
Ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.
If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.
Breaking Change Review Checklist
If you have any breaking changes as defined in the Breaking Change Policy, request approval from the Breaking Change Review Board.
Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Additional details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking Change Wiki.
NOTE: To update API(s) in public preview for over 1 year (refer to Retirement of Previews)
Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.