Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Hub Generated] Review request for Microsoft.DigitalTwins to add version stable/2022-10-31 #20374

Conversation

dejimarquis
Copy link
Contributor

@dejimarquis dejimarquis commented Aug 24, 2022

This is a PR generated at OpenAPI Hub. You can view your work branch via this link.

ARM API Information (Control Plane)

Azure 1st Party Service can try out the Shift Left experience to initiate API design review from ADO code repo. If you are interested, may request engineering support by filling in with the form https://aka.ms/ShiftLeftSupportForm.

Changelog

Add a changelog entry for this PR by answering the following questions:

  1. What's the purpose of the update?
    • new service onboarding
    • new API version
    • update existing version for new feature
    • update existing version to fix swagger quality issue in s360
    • Other, please clarify
  2. When are you targeting to deploy the new service/feature to public regions? Please provide the date or, if the date is not yet available, the month. ---- 10/31/2022
  3. When do you expect to publish the swagger? Please provide date or, the the date is not yet available, the month. --- 10/24/2022
  4. By default, Azure SDKs of all languages (.NET/Python/Java/JavaScript for both management-plane SDK and data-plane SDK, Go for management-plane SDK only ) MUST be refreshed with/after swagger of new version is published. If you prefer NOT to refresh any specific SDK language upon swagger updates in the current PR, please leave details with justification here.

Contribution checklist (MS Employees Only):

If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.

ARM API Review Checklist

Applicability: ⚠️

If your changes encompass only the following scenarios, you should SKIP this section, as these scenarios do not require ARM review.

  • Change to data plane APIs
  • Adding new properties
  • All removals

Otherwise your PR may be subject to ARM review requirements. Complete the following:

  • Check this box if any of the following apply to the PR so that the label "ARMReview" and "WaitForARMFeedback" will be added by bot to kick off ARM API Review. Missing to check this box in the following scenario may result in delays to the ARM manifest review and deployment.

    • Adding a new service
    • Adding new API(s)
    • Adding a new API version
      -[x] To review changes efficiently, ensure you copy the existing version into the new directory structure for first commit and then push new changes, including version updates, in separate commits. You can use OpenAPIHub to initialize the PR for adding a new version. For more details refer to the wiki.
  • Ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.

  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.

Breaking Change Review Checklist

If you have any breaking changes as defined in the Breaking Change Policy, request approval from the Breaking Change Review Board.

Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Additional details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking Change Wiki.

NOTE: To update API(s) in public preview for over 1 year (refer to Retirement of Previews)

Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.

@openapi-workflow-bot
Copy link

Hi, @dejimarquis Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips.

  • Please ensure to do self-check against checklists in first PR comment.
  • PR assignee is the person auto-assigned and responsible for your current PR reviewing and merging.
  • For specs comparison cross API versions, Use API Specs Comparison Report Generator
  • If there is CI failure(s), to fix CI error(s) is mandatory for PR merging; or you need to provide justification in PR comment for explanation. How to fix?

  • Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. [email protected]

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Aug 24, 2022

    Swagger Validation Report

    ️️✔️BreakingChange succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There are no breaking changes.
    ️️✔️Breaking Change(Cross-Version) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There are no breaking changes.
    compared swaggers (via Oad v0.10.2)] new version base version
    digitaltwins.json 2022-10-31(1486f5a) 2022-05-31(main)
    digitaltwins.json 2022-10-31(1486f5a) 2021-06-30-preview(main)
    ️️✔️CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There is no credential detected.
    ️⚠️LintDiff: 0 Warnings warning [Detail]
    compared tags (via openapi-validator v2.0.0) new version base version
    package-2022-10 package-2022-10(1486f5a) default(main)

    The following errors/warnings exist before current PR submission:

    Only 30 items are listed, please refer to log for more details.

    Rule Message
    CreateOperationAsyncResponseValidation An async PUT operation must set long running operation options 'x-ms-long-running-operation-options'
    Location: Microsoft.DigitalTwins/stable/2022-10-31/digitaltwins.json#L84
    LroLocationHeader A 202 response should include an Location response header.
    Location: Microsoft.DigitalTwins/stable/2022-10-31/digitaltwins.json#L194
    DeleteOperationAsyncResponseValidation An async DELETE operation must set long running operation options 'x-ms-long-running-operation-options'
    Location: Microsoft.DigitalTwins/stable/2022-10-31/digitaltwins.json#L208
    DeleteResponseBodyEmpty The delete response body must be empty.
    Location: Microsoft.DigitalTwins/stable/2022-10-31/digitaltwins.json#L240
    LroLocationHeader A 202 response should include an Location response header.
    Location: Microsoft.DigitalTwins/stable/2022-10-31/digitaltwins.json#L244
    CreateOperationAsyncResponseValidation An async PUT operation must set long running operation options 'x-ms-long-running-operation-options'
    Location: Microsoft.DigitalTwins/stable/2022-10-31/digitaltwins.json#L357
    DeleteOperationAsyncResponseValidation An async DELETE operation must set long running operation options 'x-ms-long-running-operation-options'
    Location: Microsoft.DigitalTwins/stable/2022-10-31/digitaltwins.json#L422
    DeleteResponseBodyEmpty The delete response body must be empty.
    Location: Microsoft.DigitalTwins/stable/2022-10-31/digitaltwins.json#L457
    LroLocationHeader A 202 response should include an Location response header.
    Location: Microsoft.DigitalTwins/stable/2022-10-31/digitaltwins.json#L461
    ResourceNameRestriction The resource name parameter 'privateEndpointConnectionName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction.
    Location: Microsoft.DigitalTwins/stable/2022-10-31/digitaltwins.json#L773
    DeleteOperationAsyncResponseValidation An async DELETE operation must set long running operation options 'x-ms-long-running-operation-options'
    Location: Microsoft.DigitalTwins/stable/2022-10-31/digitaltwins.json#L817
    LroLocationHeader A 202 response should include an Location response header.
    Location: Microsoft.DigitalTwins/stable/2022-10-31/digitaltwins.json#L850
    CreateOperationAsyncResponseValidation An async PUT operation must set long running operation options 'x-ms-long-running-operation-options'
    Location: Microsoft.DigitalTwins/stable/2022-10-31/digitaltwins.json#L864
    CreateOperationAsyncResponseValidation An async PUT operation must return 201.
    Location: Microsoft.DigitalTwins/stable/2022-10-31/digitaltwins.json#L902
    CreateOperationAsyncResponseValidation Only 201 is the supported response code for PUT async response.
    Location: Microsoft.DigitalTwins/stable/2022-10-31/digitaltwins.json#L903
    LroLocationHeader A 202 response should include an Location response header.
    Location: Microsoft.DigitalTwins/stable/2022-10-31/digitaltwins.json#L903
    CreateOperationAsyncResponseValidation An async PUT operation must set long running operation options 'x-ms-long-running-operation-options'
    Location: Microsoft.DigitalTwins/stable/2022-10-31/digitaltwins.json#L1013
    DeleteOperationAsyncResponseValidation An async DELETE operation must set long running operation options 'x-ms-long-running-operation-options'
    Location: Microsoft.DigitalTwins/stable/2022-10-31/digitaltwins.json#L1075
    DeleteResponseBodyEmpty The delete response body must be empty.
    Location: Microsoft.DigitalTwins/stable/2022-10-31/digitaltwins.json#L1102
    LroLocationHeader A 202 response should include an Location response header.
    Location: Microsoft.DigitalTwins/stable/2022-10-31/digitaltwins.json#L1106
    MissingTypeObject The schema 'DigitalTwinsResource' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.DigitalTwins/stable/2022-10-31/digitaltwins.json#L1257
    MissingTypeObject The schema 'DigitalTwinsIdentity' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.DigitalTwins/stable/2022-10-31/digitaltwins.json#L1308
    MissingTypeObject The schema 'ErrorResponse' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.DigitalTwins/stable/2022-10-31/digitaltwins.json#L1386
    MissingTypeObject The schema 'ErrorDefinition' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.DigitalTwins/stable/2022-10-31/digitaltwins.json#L1395
    XmsIdentifierValidation Missing identifier id in array item property
    Location: Microsoft.DigitalTwins/stable/2022-10-31/digitaltwins.json#L1408
    XmsIdentifierValidation Missing identifier id in array item property
    Location: Microsoft.DigitalTwins/stable/2022-10-31/digitaltwins.json#L1446
    MissingTypeObject The schema 'DigitalTwinsEndpointResource' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.DigitalTwins/stable/2022-10-31/digitaltwins.json#L1658
    MissingTypeObject The schema 'DigitalTwinsEndpointResourceProperties' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.DigitalTwins/stable/2022-10-31/digitaltwins.json#L1675
    ProvisioningStateValidation ProvisioningState must have terminal states: Succeeded, Failed and Canceled.
    Location: Microsoft.DigitalTwins/stable/2022-10-31/digitaltwins.json#L2004
    XmsParameterLocation The parameter 'subscriptionId' is defined in global parameters section without 'x-ms-parameter-location' extension. This would add the parameter as the client property. Please ensure that this is exactly you want. If so, apply the extension 'x-ms-parameter-location': 'client'. Else, apply the extension 'x-ms-parameter-location': 'method'.
    Location: Microsoft.DigitalTwins/stable/2022-10-31/digitaltwins.json#L2217
    ️️✔️Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for Avocado.
    ️️✔️ApiReadinessCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    ️❌~[Staging] ServiceAPIReadinessTest: 7 Errors, 0 Warnings failed [Detail]

    Tag package-2022-10; Prod region: Deployed

    Test run on region: westcentralus; Operation coverage: total: 22, untested: 0, failed: 7, passed: 15

    Service API Readiness Test failed. Check pipeline artifact for detail report.

    Rule Message
    CLIENT_ERROR "statusCode: 409,
    errorCode: Conflict,
    errorMessage: Can't update instance SubscriptionId: db5eb68e-73e2-4fa8-b18a-46cd1be4cce5,
    ResourceGroup: apiTest-UQymnE-20374,
    ResourceName : resourcenarygtzd state from Activating to Updating"
    CLIENT_ERROR "statusCode: 400,
    errorCode: BadRequest,
    errorMessage: Cannot perform action while Digital Twins instance is in 'Activating' state. Instance must be in state 'Active'."
    CLIENT_ERROR "statusCode: 404,
    errorCode: NotFound,
    errorMessage: The time series database connection was not found."
    CLIENT_ERROR "statusCode: 404,
    errorCode: NotFound,
    errorMessage: The resource was not found."
    CLIENT_ERROR "statusCode: 404,
    errorCode: NotFound,
    errorMessage: The resource was not found."
    CLIENT_ERROR "statusCode: 404,
    errorCode: NotFound,
    errorMessage: The resource was not found."
    CLIENT_ERROR "statusCode: 404,
    errorCode: NotFound,
    errorMessage: The resource was not found."
    ️️✔️~[Staging] SwaggerAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    ️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for ModelValidation.
    ️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
    ️️✔️PoliCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passed for PoliCheck.
    ️️✔️PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for PrettierCheck.
    ️️✔️SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SpellCheck.
    ️️✔️Lint(RPaaS) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for Lint(RPaaS).
    ️️✔️CadlValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for CadlValidation.
    ️️✔️PR Summary succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for Summary.
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Aug 24, 2022

    Swagger Generation Artifacts

    ️️✔️ApiDocPreview succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
     Please click here to preview with your @microsoft account. 
    ️️✔️SDK Breaking Change Tracking succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

    Breaking Changes Tracking





    ️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-python-track2 warning [Detail]
    • ⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from fc0c031. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initOutput.json
      cmderr	[automation_init.sh] WARNING: Skipping azure-nspkg as it is not installed.
      command	sh scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateOutput.json
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice New major version of npm available! 8.19.2 -> 9.1.2
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice Changelog: <https://github.com/npm/cli/releases/tag/v9.1.2>
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice Run `npm install -g [email protected]` to update!
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice
    • ️✔️track2_azure-mgmt-digitaltwins [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
      info	[Changelog]
    ️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-java warning [Detail]
    • ⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from fc0c031. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	./eng/mgmt/automation/init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/initOutput.json
      cmderr	[init.sh] [notice] A new release of pip available: 22.3 -> 22.3.1
      cmderr	[init.sh] [notice] To update, run: pip install --upgrade pip
      cmderr	[init.sh] [notice] A new release of pip available: 22.3 -> 22.3.1
      cmderr	[init.sh] [notice] To update, run: pip install --upgrade pip
      command	./eng/mgmt/automation/generate.py ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/generateOutput.json
      cmderr	[generate.py] [ForkJoinPool-1-worker-3] INFO com.azure.core.test.implementation.TestingHelpers - Environment variable 'AZURE_TEST_MODE' has not been set yet. Using 'Playback' mode.
    • ️✔️azure-resourcemanager-digitaltwins [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-go succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from fc0c031. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh ./eng/scripts/automation_init.sh ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initOutput.json
      command	generator automation-v2 ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️sdk/resourcemanager/digitaltwins/armdigitaltwins [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
      info	[Changelog] ### Features Added
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog] - New const `DigitalTwinsIdentityTypeUserAssigned`
      info	[Changelog] - New const `IdentityTypeSystemAssigned`
      info	[Changelog] - New const `IdentityTypeUserAssigned`
      info	[Changelog] - New const `DigitalTwinsIdentityTypeSystemAssignedUserAssigned`
      info	[Changelog] - New type alias `IdentityType`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `PossibleIdentityTypeValues() []IdentityType`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `ManagedIdentityReference`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `UserAssignedIdentity`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `Identity` in struct `EndpointResourceProperties`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `Identity` in struct `EventGrid`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `Identity` in struct `ServiceBus`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `Identity` in struct `EventHub`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `Identity` in struct `AzureDataExplorerConnectionProperties`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `Identity` in struct `TimeSeriesDatabaseConnectionProperties`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `UserAssignedIdentities` in struct `Identity`
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog] Total 0 breaking change(s), 17 additive change(s).
    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-js succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from fc0c031. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh .scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initOutput.json
      warn	File azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initOutput.json not found to read
      command	sh .scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️@azure/arm-digitaltwins [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
      info	[Changelog] **Features**
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog]   - Added Interface AzureDataExplorerConnectionProperties
      info	[Changelog]   - Added Interface ConnectionPropertiesPrivateLinkServiceConnectionState
      info	[Changelog]   - Added Interface DigitalTwinsDescription
      info	[Changelog]   - Added Interface DigitalTwinsEndpointResource
      info	[Changelog]   - Added Interface EventGrid
      info	[Changelog]   - Added Interface EventHub
      info	[Changelog]   - Added Interface ManagedIdentityReference
      info	[Changelog]   - Added Interface ServiceBus
      info	[Changelog]   - Added Interface TimeSeriesDatabaseConnection
      info	[Changelog]   - Added Interface UserAssignedIdentity
      info	[Changelog]   - Added Type Alias ConnectionType
      info	[Changelog]   - Added Type Alias IdentityType
      info	[Changelog]   - Interface DigitalTwinsEndpointResourceProperties has a new optional parameter identity
      info	[Changelog]   - Interface DigitalTwinsIdentity has a new optional parameter userAssignedIdentities
      info	[Changelog]   - Interface TimeSeriesDatabaseConnectionProperties has a new optional parameter identity
      info	[Changelog]   - Added Enum KnownIdentityType
      info	[Changelog]   - Enum KnownDigitalTwinsIdentityType has a new value SystemAssignedUserAssigned
      info	[Changelog]   - Enum KnownDigitalTwinsIdentityType has a new value UserAssigned
    ️⚠️ azure-resource-manager-schemas warning [Detail]
    • ⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from fc0c031. Schema Automation 14.0.0
      command	.sdkauto/initScript.sh ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initOutput.json
      cmderr	[initScript.sh]  WARN old lockfile
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile The package-lock.json file was created with an old version of npm,
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile so supplemental metadata must be fetched from the registry.
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile This is a one-time fix-up, please be patient...
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile
      warn	File azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initOutput.json not found to read
      command	.sdkauto/generateScript.sh ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️digitaltwins [View full logs]  [Release Schema Changes]
    ️️✔️ azure-powershell succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from fc0c031. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh ./tools/SwaggerCI/init.sh ../azure-powershell_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-powershell_tmp/initOutput.json
      command	pwsh ./tools/SwaggerCI/psci.ps1 ../azure-powershell_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-powershell_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️Az.DigitalTwins [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Aug 24, 2022

    Generated ApiView

    Language Package Name ApiView Link
    Go sdk/resourcemanager/digitaltwins/armdigitaltwins Create ApiView failed. Please ensure your github account in Azure/Microsoft is public and add a comment "/azp run" to re-trigger the CI.
    Python track2_azure-mgmt-digitaltwins Create ApiView failed. Please ensure your github account in Azure/Microsoft is public and add a comment "/azp run" to re-trigger the CI.
    Java azure-resourcemanager-digitaltwins Create ApiView failed. Please ensure your github account in Azure/Microsoft is public and add a comment "/azp run" to re-trigger the CI.
    JavaScript @azure/arm-digitaltwins Create ApiView failed. Please ensure your github account in Azure/Microsoft is public and add a comment "/azp run" to re-trigger the CI.

    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    Hi @dejimarquis, Your PR has some issues. Please fix the CI sequentially by following the order of Avocado, semantic validation, model validation, breaking change, lintDiff. If you have any questions, please post your questions in this channel https://aka.ms/swaggersupport.

    TaskHow to fixPriority
    AvocadoFix-AvocadoHigh
    Semantic validationFix-SemanticValidation-ErrorHigh
    Model validationFix-ModelValidation-ErrorHigh
    LintDiffFix-LintDiffhigh
    If you need further help, please feedback via swagger feedback.

    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    Hi, @dejimarquis your PR are labelled with WaitForARMFeedback. A notification email will be sent out shortly afterwards to notify ARM review board([email protected]).

    "None",
    "SystemAssigned",
    "UserAssigned",
    "SystemAssigned,UserAssigned"
    Copy link

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    SystemAssigned,UserAssigned

    This means both user and system assigned? Curious if there's any thought on providing one single for this case

    Copy link

    @efriesner efriesner Aug 29, 2022

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    Yes. This is following the contract set by the Managed Identity team and what other RPs have defined in their swagger for User Assigned Identities: https://armwiki.azurewebsites.net/authorization/managed_identities/MSIOnboardingUserAssigned.html#add-new-identity-management-type

    @zizw123 zizw123 added the ARMChangesRequested <valid label in PR review process>add this label when require changes after ARM review label Aug 26, 2022
    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    Please ensure to respond feedbacks from the ARM API reviewer. When you are ready to continue the ARM API review, please remove ARMChangesRequested

    @changlong-liu changlong-liu merged commit fc0c031 into Azure:main Nov 22, 2022
    anandanthony pushed a commit to anandMicro/azure-rest-api-specs that referenced this pull request Dec 16, 2022
    …ion stable/2022-10-31 (Azure#20374)
    
    * Adds base for updating Microsoft.DigitalTwins from version stable/2022-05-31 to version 2022-10-31
    
    * Updates readme
    
    * Updates API version in new specs and examples
    
    * Introducing 22-10-31 control plane changes for ADt
    
    * Fixing validation errors
    
    * making userAssignedIdentity rx id nullable
    
    * PR feedback
    
    * using common-types
    
    * Revert "using common-types"
    
    This reverts commit 339589c.
    
    * ManagedIdentity -> ManagedIdentityReference
    
    * Add default table and consumer groups
    
    Co-authored-by: Ayodeji Marquis <[email protected]>
    kayousef-zz pushed a commit to kayousef-zz/azure-rest-api-specs that referenced this pull request Dec 21, 2022
    …ion stable/2022-10-31 (Azure#20374)
    
    * Adds base for updating Microsoft.DigitalTwins from version stable/2022-05-31 to version 2022-10-31
    
    * Updates readme
    
    * Updates API version in new specs and examples
    
    * Introducing 22-10-31 control plane changes for ADt
    
    * Fixing validation errors
    
    * making userAssignedIdentity rx id nullable
    
    * PR feedback
    
    * using common-types
    
    * Revert "using common-types"
    
    This reverts commit 339589c.
    
    * ManagedIdentity -> ManagedIdentityReference
    
    * Add default table and consumer groups
    
    Co-authored-by: Ayodeji Marquis <[email protected]>
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    Approved-OkToMerge <valid label in PR review process>add this label when assignee approve to merge the updates ARMReview ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review CI-BreakingChange-Go CI-BreakingChange-JavaScript new-api-version ReadyForApiTest <valid label in PR review process>add this label when swagger and service APIs are ready for test resource-manager
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    7 participants