-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Hub Generated] Review request for Microsoft.Cache to add aof-backup-enabled and authnotrequired configs in version stable/2020-12-01 and stable/2021-06-01 #19566
Conversation
Hi, @samsaha-ms Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips. Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. [email protected] |
Swagger Validation Report
|
compared swaggers (via Oad v0.9.6)] | new version | base version |
---|---|---|
redis.json | 2020-12-01(fd4da8f) | 2020-12-01(main) |
redis.json | 2021-06-01(fd4da8f) | 2021-06-01(main) |
️️✔️
Breaking Change(Cross-Version) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There are no breaking changes.
️️✔️
CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There is no credential detected.
️⚠️
LintDiff: 0 Warnings warning [Detail]
compared tags (via openapi-validator v1.13.0) | new version | base version |
---|---|---|
package-2021-06 | package-2021-06(fd4da8f) | package-2021-06(main) |
package-2020-12 | package-2020-12(fd4da8f) | package-2020-12(main) |
The following errors/warnings exist before current PR submission:
Only 30 items are listed, please refer to log for more details.
Rule | Message |
---|---|
R3021 - PathResourceTypeNameCamelCase |
Resource type naming must follow camel case. Path: '/subscriptions/{subscriptionId}/providers/Microsoft.Cache/CheckNameAvailability' Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2020-12-01/redis.json#L73 |
R3021 - PathResourceTypeNameCamelCase |
Resource type naming must follow camel case. Path: '/subscriptions/{subscriptionId}/providers/Microsoft.Cache/CheckNameAvailability' Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2021-06-01/redis.json#L73 |
R4013 - IntegerTypeMustHaveFormat |
The integer type does not have a format, please add it. Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2020-12-01/redis.json#L2336 |
R4013 - IntegerTypeMustHaveFormat |
The integer type does not have a format, please add it. Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2021-06-01/redis.json#L2406 |
R4018 - OperationsApiResponseSchema |
The response schema of operations API '/providers/Microsoft.Cache/operations' does not match the ARM specification. Please standardize the schema. Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2020-12-01/redis.json#L37 |
R4018 - OperationsApiResponseSchema |
The response schema of operations API '/providers/Microsoft.Cache/operations' does not match the ARM specification. Please standardize the schema. Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2021-06-01/redis.json#L37 |
R4037 - MissingTypeObject |
The schema 'Sku' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2020-12-01/redis.json#L1789 |
R4037 - MissingTypeObject |
The schema 'RedisCommonProperties' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2020-12-01/redis.json#L1829 |
R4037 - MissingTypeObject |
The schema 'RedisCreateProperties' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2020-12-01/redis.json#L1959 |
R4037 - MissingTypeObject |
The schema 'RedisUpdateProperties' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2020-12-01/redis.json#L1991 |
R4037 - MissingTypeObject |
The schema 'RedisProperties' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2020-12-01/redis.json#L2006 |
R4037 - MissingTypeObject |
The schema 'RedisCreateParameters' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2020-12-01/redis.json#L2086 |
R4037 - MissingTypeObject |
The schema 'RedisUpdateParameters' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2020-12-01/redis.json#L2122 |
R4037 - MissingTypeObject |
The schema 'RedisAccessKeys' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2020-12-01/redis.json#L2139 |
R4037 - MissingTypeObject |
The schema 'RedisFirewallRule' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2020-12-01/redis.json#L2154 |
R4037 - MissingTypeObject |
The schema 'RedisFirewallRuleProperties' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2020-12-01/redis.json#L2180 |
R4037 - MissingTypeObject |
The schema 'RedisFirewallRuleListResult' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2020-12-01/redis.json#L2197 |
R4037 - MissingTypeObject |
The schema 'RedisResource' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2020-12-01/redis.json#L2214 |
R4037 - MissingTypeObject |
The schema 'RedisInstanceDetails' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2020-12-01/redis.json#L2239 |
R4037 - MissingTypeObject |
The schema 'RedisListResult' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2020-12-01/redis.json#L2277 |
R4037 - MissingTypeObject |
The schema 'RedisRegenerateKeyParameters' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2020-12-01/redis.json#L2294 |
R4037 - MissingTypeObject |
The schema 'RedisRebootParameters' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2020-12-01/redis.json#L2314 |
R4037 - MissingTypeObject |
The schema 'ExportRDBParameters' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2020-12-01/redis.json#L2344 |
R4037 - MissingTypeObject |
The schema 'ImportRDBParameters' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2020-12-01/redis.json#L2365 |
R4037 - MissingTypeObject |
The schema 'ScheduleEntry' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2020-12-01/redis.json#L2384 |
R4037 - MissingTypeObject |
The schema 'ScheduleEntries' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2020-12-01/redis.json#L2423 |
R4037 - MissingTypeObject |
The schema 'RedisPatchSchedule' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2020-12-01/redis.json#L2439 |
R4037 - MissingTypeObject |
The schema 'RedisPatchScheduleListResult' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2020-12-01/redis.json#L2462 |
R4037 - MissingTypeObject |
The schema 'RedisForceRebootResponse' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2020-12-01/redis.json#L2479 |
R4037 - MissingTypeObject |
The schema 'RedisLinkedServer' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2020-12-01/redis.json#L2489 |
️️✔️
Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Avocado.
️️✔️
ApiReadinessCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
️️✔️
ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for ModelValidation.
️️✔️
SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
️️✔️
PoliCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passed for PoliCheck.
️⚠️
SDK Track2 Validation: 0 Warnings warning [Detail]
- The following tags are being changed in this PR
|:speech_balloon: |"readme":"redis/resource-manager/readme.md",
"tag":"package-2021-06",
"details":"> Installing AutoRest extension '@microsoft.azure/openapi-validator' (1.11.0 -> 1.11.0)"|
|:speech_balloon: |"readme":"redis/resource-manager/readme.md",
"tag":"package-2021-06",
"details":"> Installed AutoRest extension '@microsoft.azure/openapi-validator' (1.11.0->1.11.0)"|
|:speech_balloon: |"readme":"redis/resource-manager/readme.md",
"tag":"package-2021-06",
"details":"> Installing AutoRest extension '@autorest/modelerfour' (4.21.4 -> 4.21.4)"|
|:speech_balloon: |"readme":"redis/resource-manager/readme.md",
"tag":"package-2021-06",
"details":"> Installed AutoRest extension '@autorest/modelerfour' (4.21.4->4.21.4)"|
The following errors/warnings exist before current PR submission:
Rule | Message |
---|---|
|
"readme":"redis/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2021-06", "details":"Process() cancelled due to failure " |
|
"readme":"redis/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2021-06", "details":"!Error: Plugin prechecker reported failure." |
|
"readme":"redis/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2021-06", "details":"Autorest completed with an error. If you think the error message is unclear, or is a bug, please declare an issues at https://github.com/Azure/autorest/issues with the error message you are seeing." |
"readme":"redis/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2021-06", "details":"Using directive.0.suppress which is deprecated and will be removed in the future." |
|
"readme":"redis/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2021-06", "details":"Using directive.1.suppress which is deprecated and will be removed in the future." |
|
"readme":"redis/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2021-06", "details":"Using directive.2.suppress which is deprecated and will be removed in the future." |
|
"readme":"redis/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2021-06", "details":"Using directive.3.suppress which is deprecated and will be removed in the future." |
|
"readme":"redis/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2021-06", "details":"Using directive.4.suppress which is deprecated and will be removed in the future." |
|
"readme":"redis/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2021-06", "details":"Using directive.5.suppress which is deprecated and will be removed in the future." |
|
"readme":"redis/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2021-06", "details":"Using directive.6.suppress which is deprecated and will be removed in the future." |
|
"readme":"redis/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2021-06", "details":"Semantic violation: Sibling values alongside $ref will be ignored. See https://github.com/Azure/autorest/blob/main/docs/openapi/howto/$ref-siblings.md for allowed values (components > schemas > Resource > properties > systemData)\n keys: [ \u001b[32m'type'\u001b[39m ]" |
|
"readme":"redis/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2020-12", "details":"Using directive.0.suppress which is deprecated and will be removed in the future." |
|
"readme":"redis/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2020-12", "details":"Using directive.1.suppress which is deprecated and will be removed in the future." |
|
"readme":"redis/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2020-12", "details":"Using directive.2.suppress which is deprecated and will be removed in the future." |
|
"readme":"redis/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2020-12", "details":"Using directive.3.suppress which is deprecated and will be removed in the future." |
|
"readme":"redis/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2020-12", "details":"Using directive.4.suppress which is deprecated and will be removed in the future." |
|
"readme":"redis/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2020-12", "details":"Using directive.5.suppress which is deprecated and will be removed in the future." |
|
"readme":"redis/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2020-12", "details":"Using directive.6.suppress which is deprecated and will be removed in the future." |
|
💬 | "readme":"redis/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2021-06", "details":"AutoRest core version selected from configuration: ^3.2.0." |
💬 | "readme":"redis/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2020-12", "details":"AutoRest core version selected from configuration: ^3.2.0." |
💬 | "readme":"redis/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2020-12", "details":"> Loading AutoRest extension '@microsoft.azure/openapi-validator' (1.11.0->1.11.0)" |
💬 | "readme":"redis/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2020-12", "details":"> Loading AutoRest extension '@autorest/modelerfour' (4.21.4->4.21.4)" |
💬 | "readme":"redis/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2020-12", "details":"Autorest completed in 4.13s. 0 files generated." |
️️✔️
PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for PrettierCheck.
️️✔️
SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SpellCheck.
️️✔️
Lint(RPaaS) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Lint(RPaaS).
️️✔️
CadlValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for CadlValidation.
Swagger Generation Artifacts
|
Hi @samsaha-ms, Your PR has some issues. Please fix the CI sequentially by following the order of
|
NewApiVersionRequired reason: |
2bc2030
to
50e685f
Compare
50e685f
to
1d17afe
Compare
@ruowan, Could you please help in merging the PR, in case we need breaking change review, then please help in adding the tag, we will initiate the process for the same. Thanks in advance! |
Hi @samsaha-ms, one or multiple breaking change(s) is detected in your PR. Please check out the breaking change(s), and provide business justification in the PR comment and @ PR assignee why you must have these change(s), and how external customer impact can be mitigated. Please ensure to follow breaking change policy to request breaking change review and approval before proceeding swagger PR review. |
Adding the tag as I think breaking change review may technically be required here. I don't think it was really a breaking change in service behavior, the values were already being sent and received on the wire in these versions, right? |
Yes, we have received s360 violations for the version 2020-12-01. Hence, adding in latest one also along with 2020-12-01. |
@ruowan, could you please help in merging the PR? |
…to add aof-backup-enabled and authnotrequired configs in version stable/2020-12-01 and stable/2021-06-01 (#2449) Create to sync Azure/azure-rest-api-specs#19566 [ReCreate this PR](https://github.com/azure-resource-manager-schemas/compare/main...azure-sdk:sdkAuto/redis?expand=1)
This is a PR generated at OpenAPI Hub. You can view your work branch via this link.
Changelog
Add a changelog entry for this PR by answering the following questions:
Contribution checklist:
If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.
ARM API Review Checklist
Otherwise your PR may be subject to ARM review requirements. Complete the following:
Check this box if any of the following appy to the PR so that the label "ARMReview" and "WaitForARMFeedback" will be added by bot to kick off ARM API Review. Missing to check this box in the following scenario may result in delays to the ARM manifest review and deployment.
-[ ] To review changes efficiently, ensure you are using OpenAPIHub to initialize the PR for adding a new version. More details, refer to the wiki.
Ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.
If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.
Breaking Change Review Checklist
If any of the following scenarios apply to the PR, request approval from the Breaking Change Review Board as defined in the Breaking Change Policy.
Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.
Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.