AutomationRules preview 2021_10_01 #17325
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
added 2 commits
January 9, 2022 14:23
|
Hi, @royrein Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips. Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. [email protected] |
|
[Call for Action] To better understand Azure service dev/test scenario, and support Azure service developer better on Swagger and REST API related tests in early phase, please help to fill in with this survey https://aka.ms/SurveyForEarlyPhase. It will take 5 to 10 minutes. If you already complete survey, please neglect this comment. Thanks. |
Swagger Validation Report
|
| Rule | Message |
|---|---|
| OperationId should contain the verb: 'runplaybook' in:'AutomationRules_ManualTriggerPlaybook'. Consider updating the operationId Location: Microsoft.SecurityInsights/preview/2021-10-01-preview/AutomationRules.json#L229 |
|
| Guid used in model definition 'ManualTriggerRequestBody' for property 'tenantId'. Usage of Guid is not recommanded. If GUIDs are absolutely required in your service, please get sign off from the Azure API review board. Location: Microsoft.SecurityInsights/preview/2021-10-01-preview/AutomationRules.json#L899 |
|
| Guid used in model definition 'PlaybookActionProperties' for property 'tenantId'. Usage of Guid is not recommanded. If GUIDs are absolutely required in your service, please get sign off from the Azure API review board. Location: Microsoft.SecurityInsights/preview/2021-10-01-preview/AutomationRules.json#L915 |
|
| 'incidentIdentifier' parameter lacks 'description' property. Consider adding a 'description' element. Accurate description is essential for maintaining reference documentation. Location: Microsoft.SecurityInsights/preview/2021-10-01-preview/AutomationRules.json#L249 |
|
| 'requestBody' parameter lacks 'description' property. Consider adding a 'description' element. Accurate description is essential for maintaining reference documentation. Location: Microsoft.SecurityInsights/preview/2021-10-01-preview/AutomationRules.json#L255 |
|
| The x-ms-code-generation-setting extension is being deprecated. Please remove it and move settings to readme file for code generation. Location: Microsoft.SecurityInsights/preview/2021-10-01-preview/AutomationRules.json#L7 |
|
| 'AutomationRule' model/property lacks 'description' and 'title' property. Consider adding a 'description'/'title' element. Accurate description/title is essential for maintaining reference documentation. Location: Microsoft.SecurityInsights/preview/2021-10-01-preview/AutomationRules.json#L309 |
|
| 'order' model/property lacks 'description' and 'title' property. Consider adding a 'description'/'title' element. Accurate description/title is essential for maintaining reference documentation. Location: Microsoft.SecurityInsights/preview/2021-10-01-preview/AutomationRules.json#L335 |
|
| 'AutomationRulePropertyConditionSupportedOperator' model/property lacks 'description' and 'title' property. Consider adding a 'description'/'title' element. Accurate description/title is essential for maintaining reference documentation. Location: Microsoft.SecurityInsights/preview/2021-10-01-preview/AutomationRules.json#L426 |
|
| 'AutomationRulePropertyValuesCondition' model/property lacks 'description' and 'title' property. Consider adding a 'description'/'title' element. Accurate description/title is essential for maintaining reference documentation. Location: Microsoft.SecurityInsights/preview/2021-10-01-preview/AutomationRules.json#L761 |
|
| 'propertyValues' model/property lacks 'description' and 'title' property. Consider adding a 'description'/'title' element. Accurate description/title is essential for maintaining reference documentation. Location: Microsoft.SecurityInsights/preview/2021-10-01-preview/AutomationRules.json#L770 |
|
| 'AutomationRulesList' model/property lacks 'description' and 'title' property. Consider adding a 'description'/'title' element. Accurate description/title is essential for maintaining reference documentation. Location: Microsoft.SecurityInsights/preview/2021-10-01-preview/AutomationRules.json#L795 |
|
| 'value' model/property lacks 'description' and 'title' property. Consider adding a 'description'/'title' element. Accurate description/title is essential for maintaining reference documentation. Location: Microsoft.SecurityInsights/preview/2021-10-01-preview/AutomationRules.json#L798 |
|
| 'nextLink' model/property lacks 'description' and 'title' property. Consider adding a 'description'/'title' element. Accurate description/title is essential for maintaining reference documentation. Location: Microsoft.SecurityInsights/preview/2021-10-01-preview/AutomationRules.json#L804 |
|
| 'ConditionType' model/property lacks 'description' and 'title' property. Consider adding a 'description'/'title' element. Accurate description/title is essential for maintaining reference documentation. Location: Microsoft.SecurityInsights/preview/2021-10-01-preview/AutomationRules.json#L842 |
|
| 'IncidentPropertiesAction' model/property lacks 'description' and 'title' property. Consider adding a 'description'/'title' element. Accurate description/title is essential for maintaining reference documentation. Location: Microsoft.SecurityInsights/preview/2021-10-01-preview/AutomationRules.json#L859 |
|
| 'ManualTriggerRequestBody' model/property lacks 'description' and 'title' property. Consider adding a 'description'/'title' element. Accurate description/title is essential for maintaining reference documentation. Location: Microsoft.SecurityInsights/preview/2021-10-01-preview/AutomationRules.json#L896 |
|
| 'tenantId' model/property lacks 'description' and 'title' property. Consider adding a 'description'/'title' element. Accurate description/title is essential for maintaining reference documentation. Location: Microsoft.SecurityInsights/preview/2021-10-01-preview/AutomationRules.json#L899 |
|
| 'logicAppsResourceId' model/property lacks 'description' and 'title' property. Consider adding a 'description'/'title' element. Accurate description/title is essential for maintaining reference documentation. Location: Microsoft.SecurityInsights/preview/2021-10-01-preview/AutomationRules.json#L903 |
|
| 'PlaybookActionProperties' model/property lacks 'description' and 'title' property. Consider adding a 'description'/'title' element. Accurate description/title is essential for maintaining reference documentation. Location: Microsoft.SecurityInsights/preview/2021-10-01-preview/AutomationRules.json#L908 |
|
| 'triggersOn' model/property lacks 'description' and 'title' property. Consider adding a 'description'/'title' element. Accurate description/title is essential for maintaining reference documentation. Location: Microsoft.SecurityInsights/preview/2021-10-01-preview/AutomationRules.json#L939 |
|
| 'triggersWhen' model/property lacks 'description' and 'title' property. Consider adding a 'description'/'title' element. Accurate description/title is essential for maintaining reference documentation. Location: Microsoft.SecurityInsights/preview/2021-10-01-preview/AutomationRules.json#L956 |
The following errors/warnings exist before current PR submission:
Only 30 items are listed, please refer to log for more details.
| Rule | Message |
|---|---|
| Since operation 'Entities_Queries' response has model definition 'array', it should be of the form '_list'. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change. Location: Microsoft.SecurityInsights/preview/2021-10-01-preview/Entities.json#L291 |
|
| Since operation 'Entities_GetInsights' response has model definition 'array', it should be of the form '_list'. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change. Location: Microsoft.SecurityInsights/preview/2021-10-01-preview/Entities.json#L339 |
|
| Since operation 'ThreatIntelligenceIndicator_QueryIndicators' response has model definition 'x-ms-pageable', it should be of the form '_list'. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change. Location: Microsoft.SecurityInsights/preview/2021-10-01-preview/ThreatIntelligence.json#L296 |
|
| 'GET' operation 'Entities_Queries' should use method name 'Get' or Method name start with 'List'. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change. Location: Microsoft.SecurityInsights/preview/2021-10-01-preview/Entities.json#L291 |
|
| 'PUT' operation 'ProductSettings_Update' should use method name 'Create'. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change. Location: Microsoft.SecurityInsights/preview/2021-10-01-preview/Settings.json#L176 |
|
| Consider using x-ms-client-flatten to provide a better end user experience Location: Microsoft.SecurityInsights/preview/2021-10-01-preview/Entities.json#L1030 |
|
| Consider using x-ms-client-flatten to provide a better end user experience Location: Microsoft.SecurityInsights/preview/2021-10-01-preview/ThreatIntelligence.json#L1048 |
|
| The enum types should have x-ms-enum type extension set with appropriate options. Property name: kind Location: Microsoft.SecurityInsights/preview/2021-10-01-preview/Entities.json#L1203 |
|
| Based on the response model schema, operation 'Entities_Queries' might be pageable. Consider adding the x-ms-pageable extension. Location: Microsoft.SecurityInsights/preview/2021-10-01-preview/Entities.json#L281 |
|
| Based on the response model schema, operation 'SentinelOnboardingStates_List' might be pageable. Consider adding the x-ms-pageable extension. Location: Microsoft.SecurityInsights/preview/2021-10-01-preview/OnboardingStates.json#L178 |
|
| Based on the response model schema, operation 'ProductSettings_List' might be pageable. Consider adding the x-ms-pageable extension. Location: Microsoft.SecurityInsights/preview/2021-10-01-preview/Settings.json#L38 |
|
| Based on the response model schema, operation 'ThreatIntelligenceIndicatorMetrics_List' might be pageable. Consider adding the x-ms-pageable extension. Location: Microsoft.SecurityInsights/preview/2021-10-01-preview/ThreatIntelligence.json#L334 |
|
| Sku Model definition 'Sku' is not valid. A Sku model must have 'name' property. It can also have 'tier', 'size', 'family', 'capacity' as optional properties. Location: Microsoft.SecurityInsights/preview/2021-10-01-preview/Settings.json#L388 |
|
| OperationId has a noun that conflicts with one of the model names in definitions section. The model name will be disambiguated to 'BookmarkModel'. Consider using the plural form of 'Bookmark' to avoid this. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change. Location: Microsoft.SecurityInsights/preview/2021-10-01-preview/Bookmarks.json#L291 |
|
| OperationId has a noun that conflicts with one of the model names in definitions section. The model name will be disambiguated to 'SourceControlModel'. Consider using the plural form of 'SourceControl' to avoid this. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change. Location: Microsoft.SecurityInsights/preview/2021-10-01-preview/SourceControls.json#L48 |
|
| OperationId has a noun that conflicts with one of the model names in definitions section. The model name will be disambiguated to 'DataConnectorsCheckRequirementsModel'. Consider using the plural form of 'DataConnectorsCheckRequirements' to avoid this. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change. Location: Microsoft.SecurityInsights/preview/2021-10-01-preview/dataConnectors.json#L449 |
|
| OperationId should contain the verb: 'gettimeline' in:'EntitiesGetTimeline_list'. Consider updating the operationId Location: Microsoft.SecurityInsights/preview/2021-10-01-preview/Entities.json#L243 |
|
| OperationId should contain the verb: 'dataconnectorscheckrequirements' in:'DataConnectorsCheckRequirements_Post'. Consider updating the operationId Location: Microsoft.SecurityInsights/preview/2021-10-01-preview/dataConnectors.json#L449 |
|
| The child tracked resource, 'relations' with immediate parent 'Bookmark', must have a list by immediate parent operation. Location: preview/2021-10-01-preview/common/RelationTypes.json#L30 |
|
| The child tracked resource, 'relations' with immediate parent 'Entity', must have a list by immediate parent operation. Location: preview/2021-10-01-preview/common/RelationTypes.json#L30 |
|
| The child tracked resource, 'comments' with immediate parent 'Incident', must have a list by immediate parent operation. Location: Microsoft.SecurityInsights/preview/2021-10-01-preview/Incidents.json#L1090 |
|
| The child tracked resource, 'relations' with immediate parent 'Incident', must have a list by immediate parent operation. Location: preview/2021-10-01-preview/common/RelationTypes.json#L30 |
|
| The child tracked resource, 'watchlistItems' with immediate parent 'Watchlist', must have a list by immediate parent operation. Location: Microsoft.SecurityInsights/preview/2021-10-01-preview/Watchlists.json#L596 |
|
| Guid used in model definition 'IncidentOwnerInfo' for property 'objectId'. Usage of Guid is not recommanded. If GUIDs are absolutely required in your service, please get sign off from the Azure API review board. Location: preview/2021-10-01-preview/common/IncidentTypes.json#L182 |
|
| Guid used in model definition 'ClientInfo' for property 'objectId'. Usage of Guid is not recommanded. If GUIDs are absolutely required in your service, please get sign off from the Azure API review board. Location: resource-manager/common/2.0/types.json#L35 |
|
| Guid used in model definition 'BookmarkExpandParameters' for property 'expansionId'. Usage of Guid is not recommanded. If GUIDs are absolutely required in your service, please get sign off from the Azure API review board. Location: Microsoft.SecurityInsights/preview/2021-10-01-preview/Bookmarks.json#L536 |
|
| Guid used in model definition 'UserInfo' for property 'objectId'. Usage of Guid is not recommanded. If GUIDs are absolutely required in your service, please get sign off from the Azure API review board. Location: resource-manager/common/2.0/types.json#L60 |
|
| Guid used in model definition 'SubmissionMailEntityProperties' for property 'networkMessageId'. Usage of Guid is not recommanded. If GUIDs are absolutely required in your service, please get sign off from the Azure API review board. Location: preview/2021-10-01-preview/common/EntityTypes.json#L2294 |
|
| Guid used in model definition 'SecurityGroupEntityProperties' for property 'objectGuid'. Usage of Guid is not recommanded. If GUIDs are absolutely required in your service, please get sign off from the Azure API review board. Location: preview/2021-10-01-preview/common/EntityTypes.json#L2255 |
|
| Guid used in model definition 'MailMessageEntityProperties' for property 'networkMessageId'. Usage of Guid is not recommanded. If GUIDs are absolutely required in your service, please get sign off from the Azure API review board. Location: preview/2021-10-01-preview/common/EntityTypes.json#L1352 |
️️✔️Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Avocado.
️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for ModelValidation.
️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
️⚠️Cross-Version Breaking Changes: 12 Warnings warning [Detail]
- Compared Swaggers (Based on Oad v0.9.1)
- current:preview/2021-10-01-preview/AutomationRules.json compared with base:preview/2021-09-01-preview/AutomationRules.json
- current:2021-10-01-preview/common/IncidentTypes.json compared with base:2021-09-01-preview/common/IncidentTypes.json
️🔄SDK Track2 Validation inProgress [Detail]
️️✔️PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for PrettierCheck.
️️✔️SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SpellCheck.
Swagger Generation Artifacts
|
|
Hi @royrein, Your PR has some issues. Please fix the CI sequentially by following the order of
|
ityankel
reviewed
Jan 13, 2022
.../resource-manager/Microsoft.SecurityInsights/preview/2021-10-01-preview/AutomationRules.json
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
ityankel
reviewed
Jan 13, 2022
.../resource-manager/Microsoft.SecurityInsights/preview/2021-10-01-preview/AutomationRules.json
Show resolved
Hide resolved
ityankel
reviewed
Jan 13, 2022
.../resource-manager/Microsoft.SecurityInsights/preview/2021-10-01-preview/AutomationRules.json
Show resolved
Hide resolved
.../resource-manager/Microsoft.SecurityInsights/preview/2021-10-01-preview/AutomationRules.json
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
added 2 commits
January 16, 2022 08:53
openapi-pipeline-app
bot
added
CI-FixRequiredOnFailure
and removed
CI-BreakingChange-Go-V2
CI-BreakingChange-Python-Track2
labels
openapi-pipeline-app
bot
added
CI-BreakingChange-Go-V2
CI-BreakingChange-Python-Track2
and removed
CI-FixRequiredOnFailure
labels
j5lim
reviewed
Jan 18, 2022
.../resource-manager/Microsoft.SecurityInsights/preview/2021-10-01-preview/AutomationRules.json
Show resolved
Hide resolved
j5lim
added
the
ARMChangesRequested
j5lim
added
ARMSignedOff
ityankel
approved these changes
Jan 23, 2022
leni-msft
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 7, 2022
* Adds base for updating Microsoft.SecurityInsights from version preview/2021-09-01-preview to version 2021-10-01-preview * Updates readme * Updates API version in new specs and examples * Add IoT data connector (#17086) * add Iot data connector * fix kind in getIotById * add deleted files * add missing newlines * fix newlines * Revert "Add IoT data connector (#17086)" (#17170) This reverts commit a11dd79. * Adding providerIncidentUrl & techniques to IncidentAdditionalData (#17173) * Adding providerIncidentUrl to Incident * Adding techniques to incident * Dev sentinel 2021 10 01 preview (#17314) * Bookmarks 2021-10-01-preview * prettier * definitions * rename Co-authored-by: Igal Shapira <[email protected]> * Data connectors 2021 10 01 preview office connectors added (#17193) * Project and PowerBI specs added. * Space removed * File with a wrong name removed * More changer added * Example files with inconsistent naming removed * dataConnectors json updated * Ref fixed * Prettier applied Co-authored-by: Ido Klotz <[email protected]> * AutomationRules preview 2021_10_01 (#17325) * h * first * examples * prettier * path * fixes * prettier * examples * Z * Z * responses * fix * fixes * fix * prettier * PR Fixes * PR Fixes * PR Fixes * fix * fix * fix * fix * Last * PR Fixes * Last * tryFix * tryFix * incidentTypes * fix Co-authored-by: Roy Reinhorn <[email protected]> * Add MITRE support to alert rules models (#17198) * Update alert rules models with tactics and techniques * Add attack tactics new enum values * Update alert rules models examples * Fix techniques type * Update files with prettier * Insert validations fixes * Fix validations * Fixes in alert rules models * Fix alert rules models and examples * adding changes to alert rules json * Revert "adding changes to alert rules json" This reverts commit 603490e. * Adding fusion v2 ui api documentation * some fixes * adding prettier fixes * removing unwanted property * updating the readonly properties Co-authored-by: Lilyan Cohen <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Vishal Kumar <[email protected]> * ErrorResponse changed to CloudError (#17477) Co-authored-by: Ido Klotz <[email protected]> * Done (#17488) Co-authored-by: Roy Reinhorn <[email protected]> * Adding tenantId (#17533) Co-authored-by: Ido Klotz <[email protected]> * Done (#17556) Co-authored-by: Roy Reinhorn <[email protected]> * Fix LindDiff and SemanticValidation (#17584) Co-authored-by: ShaniFelig <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: roherzbe <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Igal <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Igal Shapira <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Ido Klotz <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Ido Klotz <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: royrein <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Roy Reinhorn <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: lilyanc02 <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Lilyan Cohen <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Vishal Kumar <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.
Changelog
Add a changelog entry for this PR by answering the following questions:
January
January 21st
Contribution checklist:
If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.
ARM API Review Checklist
Otherwise your PR may be subject to ARM review requirements. Complete the following:
Check this box if any of the following apply to the PR so that label "WaitForARMFeedback" will be added automatically to begin ARM API Review. Failure to comply may result in delays to the manifest.
Ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.
If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.
Breaking Change Review Checklist
If any of the following scenarios apply to the PR, request approval from the Breaking Change Review Board as defined in the Breaking Change Policy.
Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.
Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.