-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Hub Generated] Public private branch 'Azure-SecurityInsights-New-Preview' #14753
[Hub Generated] Public private branch 'Azure-SecurityInsights-New-Preview' #14753
Conversation
… parameters and definition from 2019-01-01-preview/SecurityInsights.json
…tity mappings and new incident grouping configuration
The PR is created based on the updates in the private branch. The updates in the PR has already been reviewed and approved with this PR Azure/azure-rest-api-specs-pr/3831 |
Hi, @anat-gilenson Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips. Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. [email protected] |
[Call for Action] To better understand Azure service dev/test scenario, and support Azure service developer better on Swagger and REST API related tests in early phase, please help to fill in with this survey https://aka.ms/SurveyForEarlyPhase. It will take 5 to 10 minutes. If you already complete survey, please neglect this comment. Thanks. |
Swagger Validation Report
|
Rule | Message |
---|---|
The child tracked resource, 'comments' with immediate parent 'Incident', must have a list by immediate parent operation. Location: Microsoft.SecurityInsights/preview/2021-03-01-preview/Incidents.json#L1938 |
|
The child tracked resource, 'relations' with immediate parent 'Incident', must have a list by immediate parent operation. Location: Microsoft.SecurityInsights/preview/2021-03-01-preview/Incidents.json#L3385 |
|
Guid used in model definition 'AccountEntityProperties' for property 'objectGuid'. Usage of Guid is not recommanded. If GUIDs are absolutely required in your service, please get sign off from the Azure API review board. Location: Microsoft.SecurityInsights/preview/2021-03-01-preview/Incidents.json#L947 |
|
Guid used in model definition 'ClientInfo' for property 'objectId'. Usage of Guid is not recommanded. If GUIDs are absolutely required in your service, please get sign off from the Azure API review board. Location: Microsoft.SecurityInsights/preview/2021-03-01-preview/Incidents.json#L1187 |
|
Guid used in model definition 'IncidentOwnerInfo' for property 'objectId'. Usage of Guid is not recommanded. If GUIDs are absolutely required in your service, please get sign off from the Azure API review board. Location: Microsoft.SecurityInsights/preview/2021-03-01-preview/Incidents.json#L2173 |
|
Guid used in model definition 'IoTDeviceEntityProperties' for property 'iotSecurityAgentId'. Usage of Guid is not recommanded. If GUIDs are absolutely required in your service, please get sign off from the Azure API review board. Location: Microsoft.SecurityInsights/preview/2021-03-01-preview/Incidents.json#L2467 |
|
Guid used in model definition 'MailboxEntityProperties' for property 'externalDirectoryObjectId'. Usage of Guid is not recommanded. If GUIDs are absolutely required in your service, please get sign off from the Azure API review board. Location: Microsoft.SecurityInsights/preview/2021-03-01-preview/Incidents.json#L2636 |
|
Guid used in model definition 'MailMessageEntityProperties' for property 'networkMessageId'. Usage of Guid is not recommanded. If GUIDs are absolutely required in your service, please get sign off from the Azure API review board. Location: Microsoft.SecurityInsights/preview/2021-03-01-preview/Incidents.json#L2857 |
|
Guid used in model definition 'SecurityGroupEntityProperties' for property 'objectGuid'. Usage of Guid is not recommanded. If GUIDs are absolutely required in your service, please get sign off from the Azure API review board. Location: Microsoft.SecurityInsights/preview/2021-03-01-preview/Incidents.json#L3884 |
|
Guid used in model definition 'SubmissionMailEntityProperties' for property 'networkMessageId'. Usage of Guid is not recommanded. If GUIDs are absolutely required in your service, please get sign off from the Azure API review board. Location: Microsoft.SecurityInsights/preview/2021-03-01-preview/Incidents.json#L3923 |
The following errors/warnings exist before current PR submission:
Only 10 items are listed, please refer to log for more details.
Rule | Message |
---|---|
R4018 - OperationsApiResponseSchema |
The response schema of operations API '/providers/Microsoft.SecurityInsights/operations' does not match the ARM specification. Please standardize the schema. Location: Microsoft.SecurityInsights/preview/2021-03-01-preview/operations.json#L37 |
R4037 - MissingTypeObject |
The schema 'Resource' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: resource-manager/common/1.0/types.json#L52 |
R4037 - MissingTypeObject |
The schema 'ResourceWithEtag' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: resource-manager/common/1.0/types.json#L38 |
R4037 - MissingTypeObject |
The schema 'SettingList' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: Microsoft.SecurityInsights/preview/2021-03-01-preview/Settings.json#L227 |
R4037 - MissingTypeObject |
The schema 'UebaProperties' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: Microsoft.SecurityInsights/preview/2021-03-01-preview/Settings.json#L343 |
R4037 - MissingTypeObject |
The schema 'Sku' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: Microsoft.SecurityInsights/preview/2021-03-01-preview/Settings.json#L369 |
R4037 - MissingTypeObject |
The schema 'Resource' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: resource-manager/common/1.0/types.json#L52 |
R4037 - MissingTypeObject |
The schema 'ResourceWithEtag' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: resource-manager/common/1.0/types.json#L38 |
R4037 - MissingTypeObject |
The schema 'SentinelOnboardingStatesList' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: Microsoft.SecurityInsights/preview/2021-03-01-preview/OnboardingStates.json#L259 |
R4037 - MissingTypeObject |
The schema 'Resource' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'. Location: resource-manager/common/1.0/types.json#L52 |
️️✔️
Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Avocado.
️️✔️
ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for ModelValidation.
️️✔️
SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
️️✔️
Cross-Version Breaking Changes succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There are no breaking changes.
️️✔️
CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There is no credential detected.
️️✔️
[Staging] SDK Track2 Validation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SDKTrack2Validation
- The following tags are being changed in this PR
|:speech_balloon: AutorestCore/Exception|"readme":"securityinsights/resource-manager/readme.md",
"tag":"package-2021-03-preview-only",
"details":"> Installing AutoRest extension '@microsoft.azure/openapi-validator' (1.8.0)"|
|:speech_balloon: AutorestCore/Exception|"readme":"securityinsights/resource-manager/readme.md",
"tag":"package-2021-03-preview-only",
"details":"> Installed AutoRest extension '@microsoft.azure/openapi-validator' (1.8.0->1.8.0)"|
The following errors/warnings exist before current PR submission:
|:speech_balloon: AutorestCore/Exception|"readme":"securityinsights/resource-manager/readme.md",
"tag":"package-2021-03-preview-only",
"details":"> Loading AutoRest extension '@autorest/modelerfour' (4.15.456->4.15.456)"|
️️✔️
[Staging] PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for PrettierCheck.
️️✔️
[Staging] SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SpellCheck.
️️✔️
[Staging] Lint(RPaaS) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Lint(RPaaS).
Swagger Generation Artifacts
|
NewApiVersionRequired reason: |
7bb9468
to
ce3de83
Compare
…view' (Azure#14753) * Add 'Resource' definition in common types * Export incidents resource to new preview API version * New version for incidents and updated examples - team colaboration * Extract alertRules and alertRuleTemplates endpoints and their related parameters and definition from 2019-01-01-preview/SecurityInsights.json * New version for alert rules and updated examples - custom details, entity mappings and new incident grouping configuration * Fix readme * mark triggerUri secret * Fix linting errors Co-authored-by: Dor Siso <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Anat Gilenson <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Anat Gilenson <[email protected]>
…view' (Azure#14753) * Add 'Resource' definition in common types * Export incidents resource to new preview API version * New version for incidents and updated examples - team colaboration * Extract alertRules and alertRuleTemplates endpoints and their related parameters and definition from 2019-01-01-preview/SecurityInsights.json * New version for alert rules and updated examples - custom details, entity mappings and new incident grouping configuration * Fix readme * mark triggerUri secret * Fix linting errors Co-authored-by: Dor Siso <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Anat Gilenson <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Anat Gilenson <[email protected]>
This is a PR generated at OpenAPI Hub. You can view your work branch via this link.
Changelog
Please ensure to add changelog with this PR by answering the following questions.
Contribution checklist:
If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.
ARM API Review Checklist
Ensure to check this box if one of the following scenarios meet updates in the PR, so that label “WaitForARMFeedback” will be added automatically to involve ARM API Review. Failure to comply may result in delays for manifest application. Note this does not apply to data plane APIs, all “removals” and “adding a new property” no more require ARM API review.
Please ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.
If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.
Breaking Change Review Checklist
If there are following updates in the PR, ensure to request an approval from Breaking Change Review Board as defined in the Breaking Change Policy.
Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.
Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.