-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Web ant93 release: Updating API version to 2021-01-01 #14489
Conversation
…o version 2021-01-01
#14212) * Bring in swagger for Microsoft.CertificateRegistration and Microsoft.DomainRegistration RPs * Add custom word * Actually bring in swagger for Microsoft.CertificateRegistration and Microsoft.DomainRegistration RPs
Adding ElasticScaleEnabled to ASP object!
* Swagger changes for kubeenv * Add examples for create and update * Fixing model validations in examples * Supress systemData for kubeenvironments.json * Making small change to trigger a re-run of ApiReview runner * Fixing extendedLocation bug in swagger * fix model validation
Hi, @naveedaz Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips. Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. [email protected] |
[Call for Action] To better understand Azure service dev/test scenario, and support Azure service developer better on Swagger and REST API related tests in early phase, please help to fill in with this survey https://aka.ms/SurveyForEarlyPhase. It will take 5 to 10 minutes. If you already complete survey, please neglect this comment. Thanks. |
Swagger Validation Report
|
Swagger Generation Artifacts
|
@weidongxu-microsoft Can you please help figure out why 'Swagger SDK Breaking Change Tracking' is failing? We have the suppressions in place. |
* Update readme.python.md * Update readme.md
Would you let me know whether all commits in this PR is ARM reviewed (in dev branch)? |
No breaking change to Java. Test PR Azure/azure-sdk-for-java#21704 |
@msyyc Please help us figure out what needs to be done for python here. |
Would you let me know whether all commits in this PR is ARM reviewed (in dev branch)? |
@weidongxu-microsoft , Yes the PRs are ARM reviewed. |
For python, the breaking change is expected. |
* Adds base for updating Microsoft.Web from version stable/2020-12-01 to version 2021-01-01 * Updates readme * Updates API version in new specs and examples * Bring in swagger for Microsoft.CertificateRegistration and Microsoft.… (Azure#14212) * Bring in swagger for Microsoft.CertificateRegistration and Microsoft.DomainRegistration RPs * Add custom word * Actually bring in swagger for Microsoft.CertificateRegistration and Microsoft.DomainRegistration RPs * Update AppServicePlan.json with preoperty (Azure#14388) Adding ElasticScaleEnabled to ASP object! * Swagger changes for kubeenv (Azure#14417) * Swagger changes for kubeenv * Add examples for create and update * Fixing model validations in examples * Supress systemData for kubeenvironments.json * Making small change to trigger a re-run of ApiReview runner * Fixing extendedLocation bug in swagger * fix model validation * Carry over missing Acr properties from previous version (Azure#14490) * [python]Update readme.python.md (Azure#14493) * Update readme.python.md * Update readme.md Co-authored-by: jocawtho <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: JennyLawrance <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: msyyc <[email protected]>
MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.
Changelog
Please ensure to add changelog with this PR by answering the following questions.
Contribution checklist:
If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.
ARM API Review Checklist
Ensure to check this box if one of the following scenarios meet updates in the PR, so that label “WaitForARMFeedback” will be added automatically to involve ARM API Review. Failure to comply may result in delays for manifest application. Note this does not apply to data plane APIs, all “removals” and “adding a new property” no more require ARM API review.
Please ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.
If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.
Breaking Change Review Checklist
If there are following updates in the PR, ensure to request an approval from Breaking Change Review Board as defined in the Breaking Change Policy.
Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.
Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.