-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
New Microsoft.Security proxy rp type of ingestionSettings #14226
Conversation
Hi, @kunchawla Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips. Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. [email protected] |
Swagger Validation Report
|
Rule | Message |
---|---|
The child tracked resource, 'aggregatedAlerts' with immediate parent 'IoTSecuritySolutionModel', must have a list by immediate parent operation. Location: Microsoft.Security/preview/2021-01-15-preview/ingestionSettings.json#L271 |
|
The child tracked resource, 'aggregatedRecommendations' with immediate parent 'IoTSecuritySolutionModel', must have a list by immediate parent operation. Location: Microsoft.Security/preview/2021-01-15-preview/ingestionSettings.json#L271 |
|
The child tracked resource, 'iotAlertTypes' with immediate parent 'IoTSecuritySolutionModel', must have a list by immediate parent operation. Location: Microsoft.Security/preview/2021-01-15-preview/ingestionSettings.json#L271 |
|
The child tracked resource, 'iotAlerts' with immediate parent 'IoTSecuritySolutionModel', must have a list by immediate parent operation. Location: Microsoft.Security/preview/2021-01-15-preview/ingestionSettings.json#L271 |
|
The child tracked resource, 'iotRecommendationTypes' with immediate parent 'IoTSecuritySolutionModel', must have a list by immediate parent operation. Location: Microsoft.Security/preview/2021-01-15-preview/ingestionSettings.json#L271 |
|
The child tracked resource, 'iotRecommendations' with immediate parent 'IoTSecuritySolutionModel', must have a list by immediate parent operation. Location: Microsoft.Security/preview/2021-01-15-preview/ingestionSettings.json#L271 |
The following errors/warnings exist before current PR submission:
Only 10 items are listed, please refer to log for more details.
Rule | Message |
---|---|
R3021 - PathResourceTypeNameCamelCase |
Resource type naming must follow camel case. Path: '/subscriptions/{subscriptionId}/providers/Microsoft.Security/locations/{ascLocation}/ExternalSecuritySolutions' Location: Microsoft.Security/stable/2020-01-01/externalSecuritySolutions.json#L76 |
R3021 - PathResourceTypeNameCamelCase |
Resource type naming must follow camel case. Path: '/subscriptions/{subscriptionId}/resourceGroups/{resourceGroupName}/providers/Microsoft.Security/locations/{ascLocation}/ExternalSecuritySolutions/{externalSecuritySolutionsName}' Location: Microsoft.Security/stable/2020-01-01/externalSecuritySolutions.json#L118 |
R4011 - DeleteOperationResponses |
The delete operation is defined without a 200 or 204 error response implementation,please add it.' Location: Microsoft.Security/preview/2017-08-01-preview/securityContacts.json#L185 |
R4011 - DeleteOperationResponses |
The delete operation is defined without a 200 or 204 error response implementation,please add it.' Location: Microsoft.Security/preview/2017-08-01-preview/workspaceSettings.json#L216 |
R4011 - DeleteOperationResponses |
The delete operation is defined without a 200 or 204 error response implementation,please add it.' Location: Microsoft.Security/preview/2019-01-01-preview/automations.json#L239 |
R4011 - DeleteOperationResponses |
The delete operation is defined without a 200 or 204 error response implementation,please add it.' Location: Microsoft.Security/preview/2019-01-01-preview/alertsSuppressionRules.json#L182 |
R4011 - DeleteOperationResponses |
The delete operation is defined without a 200 or 204 error response implementation,please add it.' Location: Microsoft.Security/stable/2020-01-01/assessmentMetadata.json#L248 |
R4013 - IntegerTypeMustHaveFormat |
The integer type does not have a format, please add it. Location: Microsoft.Security/preview/2017-08-01-preview/compliances.json#L163 |
R4013 - IntegerTypeMustHaveFormat |
The integer type does not have a format, please add it. Location: Microsoft.Security/preview/2019-01-01-preview/regulatoryCompliance.json#L371 |
R4013 - IntegerTypeMustHaveFormat |
The integer type does not have a format, please add it. Location: Microsoft.Security/preview/2019-01-01-preview/regulatoryCompliance.json#L376 |
️⚠️
Avocado: 1 Warnings warning [Detail]
Rule | Message |
---|---|
The default tag contains multiple API versions swaggers. readme: specification/security/resource-manager/readme.md tag: specification/security/resource-manager/readme.md#tag-package-composite-v3 |
️️✔️
ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for ModelValidation.
️️✔️
SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
️️✔️
Cross-Version Breaking Changes succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There are no breaking changes.
️️✔️
CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There is no credential detected.
️️✔️
[Staging] SDK Track2 Validation succeeded [Detail]
- The following tags are being changed in this PR
- security/resource-manager/readme.md#package-composite-v1
- security/resource-manager/readme.md#package-composite-v2
- security/resource-manager/readme.md#package-composite-v3
- security/resource-manager/readme.md#package-2015-06-preview-only
- security/resource-manager/readme.md#package-2017-08-preview-only
- security/resource-manager/readme.md#package-2019-01-preview-only
- security/resource-manager/readme.md#package-2020-01-preview-only
- security/resource-manager/readme.md#package-2017-08-only
- security/resource-manager/readme.md#package-2018-06-only
- security/resource-manager/readme.md#package-2019-01-only
- security/resource-manager/readme.md#package-2019-08-only
- security/resource-manager/readme.md#package-package-2020-01-preview-only
- security/resource-manager/readme.md#package-2020-01-only
- security/resource-manager/readme.md#package-2020-07-preview-only
- security/resource-manager/readme.md#package-2020-08-preview-only
- security/resource-manager/readme.md#package-2021-01-preview-only
|:speech_balloon: AutorestCore/Exception|"readme":"security/resource-manager/readme.md",
"tag":"package-composite-v1",
"details":"> Installing AutoRest extension '@microsoft.azure/openapi-validator' (1.8.0)"|
|:speech_balloon: AutorestCore/Exception|"readme":"security/resource-manager/readme.md",
"tag":"package-composite-v1",
"details":"> Installed AutoRest extension '@microsoft.azure/openapi-validator' (1.8.0->1.8.0)"|
|:speech_balloon: AutorestCore/Exception|"readme":"security/resource-manager/readme.md",
"tag":"package-2021-01-preview-only",
"details":"> Loading AutoRest extension '@microsoft.azure/openapi-validator' (1.8.0->1.8.0)"|
|:speech_balloon: AutorestCore/Exception|"readme":"security/resource-manager/readme.md",
"tag":"package-2021-01-preview-only",
"details":"> Loading AutoRest extension '@autorest/modelerfour' (4.15.456->4.15.456)"|
The following errors/warnings exist before current PR submission:
Rule | Message |
---|---|
AutorestCore/Exception |
"readme":"security/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-composite-v1", "details":"Error: Semantic validation failed. There was some errors" |
AutorestCore/Exception |
"readme":"security/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-composite-v2", "details":"Error: Semantic validation failed. There was some errors" |
PreCheck/DuplicateSchema |
"readme":"security/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-composite-v3", "details":"Duplicate Schema named ExternalSecuritySolutionKind -- type: undefined => "string", properties: "kind":"$ref":"#/components/schemas/ExternalSecuritySolutionKind", "description":"The kind of the external solution" =>, enum: undefined => ["CEF", "ATA", "AAD"], x-ms-enum: undefined => "name":"ExternalSecuritySolutionKind", "modelAsString":true, "values":["value":"CEF", "value":"ATA", "value":"AAD"] ; This error can be temporarily avoided by using the 'modelerfour.lenient-model-deduplication' setting. NOTE: This setting will be removed in a future version of @autorest/modelerfour; schemas should be updated to fix this issue sooner than that." |
PreCheck/DuplicateSchema |
"readme":"security/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-composite-v3", "details":"Duplicate Schema named AadConnectivityState -- type: undefined => "string", properties: "connectivityState":"$ref":"#/components/schemas/AadConnectivityState" =>, title: undefined => "The connectivity state of the external AAD solution ", enum: undefined => ["Discovered", "NotLicensed", "Connected"], x-ms-enum: undefined => "name":"AadConnectivityState", "modelAsString":true, "values":["value":"Discovered", "value":"NotLicensed", "value":"Connected"] ; This error can be temporarily avoided by using the 'modelerfour.lenient-model-deduplication' setting. NOTE: This setting will be removed in a future version of @autorest/modelerfour; schemas should be updated to fix this issue sooner than that." |
AutorestCore/Exception |
"readme":"security/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-composite-v3", "details":"Error: Plugin prechecker reported failure." |
AutorestCore/Exception |
"readme":"security/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2015-06-preview-only", "details":"Error: Semantic validation failed. There was some errors" |
PreCheck/DuplicateSchema |
"readme":"security/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2020-01-only", "details":"Duplicate Schema named ExternalSecuritySolutionKind -- type: undefined => "string", properties: "kind":"$ref":"#/components/schemas/ExternalSecuritySolutionKind", "description":"The kind of the external solution" =>, enum: undefined => ["CEF", "ATA", "AAD"], x-ms-enum: undefined => "name":"ExternalSecuritySolutionKind", "modelAsString":true, "values":["value":"CEF", "value":"ATA", "value":"AAD"] ; This error can be temporarily avoided by using the 'modelerfour.lenient-model-deduplication' setting. NOTE: This setting will be removed in a future version of @autorest/modelerfour; schemas should be updated to fix this issue sooner than that." |
PreCheck/DuplicateSchema |
"readme":"security/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2020-01-only", "details":"Duplicate Schema named AadConnectivityState -- type: undefined => "string", properties: "connectivityState":"$ref":"#/components/schemas/AadConnectivityState" =>, title: undefined => "The connectivity state of the external AAD solution ", enum: undefined => ["Discovered", "NotLicensed", "Connected"], x-ms-enum: undefined => "name":"AadConnectivityState", "modelAsString":true, "values":["value":"Discovered", "value":"NotLicensed", "value":"Connected"] ; This error can be temporarily avoided by using the 'modelerfour.lenient-model-deduplication' setting. NOTE: This setting will be removed in a future version of @autorest/modelerfour; schemas should be updated to fix this issue sooner than that." |
AutorestCore/Exception |
"readme":"security/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2020-01-only", "details":"Error: Plugin prechecker reported failure." |
💬 AutorestCore/Exception | "readme":"security/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-composite-v1", "details":"> Loading AutoRest extension '@autorest/modelerfour' (4.15.456->4.15.456)" |
️️✔️
[Staging] PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for PrettierCheck.
️️✔️
[Staging] SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SpellCheck.
️️✔️
[Staging] Lint(RPaaS) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Lint(RPaaS).
[Call for Action] To better understand Azure service dev/test scenario, and support Azure service developer better on Swagger and REST API related tests in early phase, please help to fill in with this survey https://aka.ms/SurveyForEarlyPhase. It will take 5 to 10 minutes. If you already complete survey, please neglect this comment. Thanks. |
Swagger Generation Artifacts
|
...ty/preview/2021-01-15-preview/examples/IngestionSettings/DeleteIngestionSetting_example.json
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...curity/resource-manager/Microsoft.Security/preview/2021-01-15-preview/ingestionSettings.json
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...curity/resource-manager/Microsoft.Security/preview/2021-01-15-preview/ingestionSettings.json
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...curity/resource-manager/Microsoft.Security/preview/2021-01-15-preview/ingestionSettings.json
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...curity/resource-manager/Microsoft.Security/preview/2021-01-15-preview/ingestionSettings.json
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...curity/resource-manager/Microsoft.Security/preview/2021-01-15-preview/ingestionSettings.json
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...curity/resource-manager/Microsoft.Security/preview/2021-01-15-preview/ingestionSettings.json
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...curity/resource-manager/Microsoft.Security/preview/2021-01-15-preview/ingestionSettings.json
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...curity/resource-manager/Microsoft.Security/preview/2021-01-15-preview/ingestionSettings.json
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...curity/resource-manager/Microsoft.Security/preview/2021-01-15-preview/ingestionSettings.json
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...curity/resource-manager/Microsoft.Security/preview/2021-01-15-preview/ingestionSettings.json
Show resolved
Hide resolved
"200": { | ||
"description": "OK", | ||
"schema": { | ||
"$ref": "#/definitions/IngestionSetting" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
at least make these 2 different object types in here (no need to change server side code), just to make the documentation clearer without any change to the working API
...curity/resource-manager/Microsoft.Security/preview/2021-01-15-preview/ingestionSettings.json
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Please go through and complete the checklist in the PR description |
Hi, @kunchawla your PR are labelled with WaitForARMFeedback. A notification email will be sent out shortly afterwards to notify ARM review board([email protected]). cc @leni-msft |
...curity/resource-manager/Microsoft.Security/preview/2021-01-15-preview/ingestionSettings.json
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...curity/resource-manager/Microsoft.Security/preview/2021-01-15-preview/ingestionSettings.json
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
* New Microsoft.Security proxy rp type of ingestionSettings * PR feedback * Feedback * Fix check error * PR Feedback for list tokens * Fix example description * Remove suppressions from readme.md Co-authored-by: Kunal Chawla <[email protected]>
MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.
Corresponding PR in private repo for the private preview - https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs-pr/pull/2446
Changelog
Please ensure to add changelog with this PR by answering the following questions.
Already Deployed
May-June'2021
Contribution checklist:
If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.
ARM API Review Checklist
Ensure to check this box if one of the following scenarios meet updates in the PR, so that label “WaitForARMFeedback” will be added automatically to involve ARM API Review. Failure to comply may result in delays for manifest application. Note this does not apply to data plane APIs, all “removals” and “adding a new property” no more require ARM API review.
Please ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.
If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.
Breaking Change Review Checklist
If there are following updates in the PR, ensure to request an approval from Breaking Change Review Board as defined in the Breaking Change Policy.
Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.
Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.