Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding patch operation in 2019-03-01 API #12190

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jan 25, 2021
Merged

Conversation

napolish
Copy link
Contributor

@napolish napolish commented Dec 21, 2020

MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.

Changelog

Please ensure to add changelog with this PR by answering the following questions.

  1. What's the purpose of the update?
    • new service onboarding
    • new API version
    • update existing version for new feature
    • update existing version to fix swagger quality issue in s360
    • Other, please clarify
  2. When you are targeting to deploy new service/feature to public regions? Please provide date, or month to public if date is not available yet.
  3. When you expect to publish swagger? Please provide date, or month to public if date is not available yet.
  4. If it's an update to existing version, please select SDKs of specific language and CLIs that require refresh after swagger is published.
    • SDK of .NET (need service team to ensure code readiness)
    • SDK of Python
    • SDK of Java
    • SDK of Js
    • SDK of Go
    • PowerShell
    • CLI
    • Terraform
    • No, no need to refresh for updates in this PR

Contribution checklist:

If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.

ARM API Review Checklist

  • Ensure to check this box if one of the following scenarios meet updates in the PR, so that label “WaitForARMFeedback” will be added automatically to involve ARM API Review. Failure to comply may result in delays for manifest application. Note this does not apply to data plane APIs, all “removals” and “adding a new property” no more require ARM API review.

    • Adding new API(s)
    • Adding a new API version
    • Adding a new service
  • Please ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.

  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.

Breaking Change Review Checklist

If there are following updates in the PR, ensure to request an approval from API Review Board as defined in the Breaking Change Policy.

  • Removing API(s) in stable version
  • Removing properties in stable version
  • Removing API version(s) in stable version
  • Updating API in stable version with Breaking Change Validation errors
  • Updating API(s) in preview over 1 year

Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.

Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.

@openapi-workflow-bot
Copy link

Hi, @napolish Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips.

  • Please ensure to do self-check against checklists in first PR comment.
  • PR assignee is the person auto-assigned and responsible for your current PR reviewing and merging.
  • For specs comparison cross API versions, Use API Specs Comparison Report Generator
  • If there is CI failure(s), to fix CI error(s) is mandatory for PR merging; or you need to provide justification in PR comment for explanation. How to fix?

  • Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. [email protected]

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Dec 21, 2020

    Swagger Validation Report

    ️❌BreakingChange: 1 Errors, 0 Warnings failed [Detail]

    Rule Message
    1039 - AddedOperation The new version is adding an operation that was not found in the old version.
    New: Microsoft.AlertsManagement/stable/2019-03-01/SmartDetectorAlertRulesApi.json#L217:7
    ️❌LintDiff: 1 Errors, 1 Warnings failed [Detail]

    Rule Message
    R4007 - DefaultErrorResponseSchema the default error response schema does not correspond to the schema documented at https://github.com/Azure/azure-resource-manager-rpc/blob/master/v1.0/common-api-details.md#error-response-content.
    New: Microsoft.AlertsManagement/stable/2019-03-01/SmartDetectorAlertRulesApi.json#L247
    ⚠️ R1007 - PatchInOperationName 'PATCH' operation 'SmartDetectorAlertRules_Patch' should use method name 'Update'. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change.
    New: Microsoft.AlertsManagement/stable/2019-03-01/SmartDetectorAlertRulesApi.json#L221
    ️⚠️Avocado: 1 Warnings warning [Detail]
    Rule Message
    ⚠️ MULTIPLE_API_VERSION The default tag contains multiple API versions swaggers.
    readme: specification/alertsmanagement/resource-manager/readme.md
    tag: specification/alertsmanagement/resource-manager/readme.md#tag-package-2019-06-preview
    ️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for ModelValidation.
    ️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
    ️️✔️[Staging] Cross Version BreakingChange (Base on preview version) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There are no breaking changes.
    ️️✔️[Staging] Cross Version BreakingChange (Base on stable version) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There are no breaking changes.
    ️️✔️CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There is no credential detected.
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Dec 21, 2020

    Swagger Generation Artifacts

    ️️✔️ azure-resource-manager-schemas succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from 742d12e. Schema Automation 14.0.0
      warn	Skip initScript due to not configured
      command	npx n 12
      command	autorest --use=@autorest/[email protected] --version=3.0.6351 --azureresourceschema --multiapi --title=none --pass-thru:subset-reducer --azureresourceschema-folder=/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-resource-manager-schemas/azure-resource-manager-schemas ../../azure-rest-api-specs/specification/alertsmanagement/resource-manager/readme.md
    • ️✔️alertsmanagement [View full logs]  [Release Schema Changes]
      cmderr	[resource-manager] node-pre-gyp
      cmderr	[resource-manager] WARN Using request for node-pre-gyp https download
      cmderr	[resource-manager]  [email protected] No repository field.
      cmderr	[resource-manager] optional SKIPPING OPTIONAL DEPENDENCY: [email protected] (node_modules/fsevents):
      cmderr	[resource-manager] npm WARN notsup SKIPPING OPTIONAL DEPENDENCY: Unsupported platform for [email protected]: wanted {"os":"darwin","arch":"any"} (current: {"os":"linux","arch":"x64"})
    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-net succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-go succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from 742d12e. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh ./initScript.sh ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initOutput.json
      command	go run ./tools/generator/main.go ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️alertsmanagement/mgmt/2019-03-01/alertsmanagement [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
      info	[Changelog] ### New Content
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog] - New function `AlertRulePatchObject.MarshalJSON() ([]byte, error)`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `SmartDetectorAlertRulesClient.PatchSender(*http.Request) (*http.Response, error)`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `*AlertRulePatchObject.UnmarshalJSON([]byte) error`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `SmartDetectorAlertRulesClient.PatchPreparer(context.Context, string, string, AlertRulePatchObject) (*http.Request, error)`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `SmartDetectorAlertRulesClient.PatchResponder(*http.Response) (AlertRule, error)`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `SmartDetectorAlertRulesClient.Patch(context.Context, string, string, AlertRulePatchObject) (AlertRule, error)`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `AlertRulePatchObject`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `AlertRulePatchProperties`
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog] Total 0 breaking change(s), 10 additive change(s).
      info	[Changelog]
    • ️✔️alertsmanagement/mgmt/2018-05-05/alertsmanagement [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
      info	[Changelog] No exported changes
    • ️✔️preview/alertsmanagement/mgmt/2019-06-01-preview/alertsmanagement [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
      info	[Changelog] No exported changes
    • ️✔️preview/alertsmanagement/mgmt/2019-05-05-preview/alertsmanagement [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
      info	[Changelog] No exported changes
    • ️✔️preview/alertsmanagement/mgmt/2018-05-05-preview/alertsmanagement [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
      info	[Changelog] No exported changes
    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-python succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from 742d12e. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      warn	Skip initScript due to not configured
      command	npx n 12
      command	python3 -m venv venv
      command	pip install --upgrade setuptools wheel pip
      command	pip install pathlib jinja2 msrestazure
      command	autorest --version=V2 [email protected]/autorest.python@~4.0.71 --python --python-mode=update --multiapi --keep-version-file --no-async --python-sdks-folder=/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-python/sdk ../azure-rest-api-specs/specification/alertsmanagement/resource-manager/readme.md
    • ️✔️azure-mgmt-alertsmanagement [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
      cmderr	[buildConf] INFO:packaging_tools:Building template azure-mgmt-alertsmanagement
      cmderr	[buildConf] INFO:packaging_tools.conf:Skipping default conf since the file exists
      cmderr	[buildConf] INFO:packaging_tools:Skipping CHANGELOG.md template, since a previous one was found
      cmderr	[buildConf] INFO:packaging_tools:Template done azure-mgmt-alertsmanagement
      cmderr	[changelogSetup] WARNING: Skipping azure-nspkg as it is not installed.
      cmderr	[changelogReport] INFO:__main__:Looking for Autorest generated package in azure.mgmt.alertsmanagement
      cmderr	[changelogReport] INFO:__main__:Found azure.mgmt.alertsmanagement
      cmderr	[changelogReport] INFO:__main__:Working on azure.mgmt.alertsmanagement
      cmderr	[changelogReport] INFO:__main__:Report written to sdk/alertsmanagement/azure-mgmt-alertsmanagement/code_reports/latest/report.json
      cmderr	[changelogReportLatest] INFO:__main__:Download versions of azure-mgmt-alertsmanagement on PyPI
      cmderr	[changelogReportLatest] INFO:__main__:Got ['0.1.0', '0.2.0rc1', '0.2.0rc2', '1.0.0b1']
      cmderr	[changelogReportLatest] INFO:__main__:Only keep last PyPI version
      cmderr	[changelogReportLatest] INFO:__main__:Installing version 0.2.0rc2 of azure-mgmt-alertsmanagement in a venv
      cmderr	[changelogReportLatest] Cache entry deserialization failed, entry ignored
      cmderr	[changelogReportLatest] INFO:__main__:Looking for Autorest generated package in azure.mgmt.alertsmanagement
      cmderr	[changelogReportLatest] INFO:__main__:Found azure.mgmt.alertsmanagement
      cmderr	[changelogReportLatest] INFO:__main__:Working on azure.mgmt.alertsmanagement
      cmderr	[changelogReportLatest] INFO:__main__:Report written to sdk/alertsmanagement/azure-mgmt-alertsmanagement/code_reports/0.2.0rc2/report.json
      cmdout	[Changelog] Size of delta 3.063% size of original (original: 35162 chars, delta: 1077 chars)
    ️️✔️[Staging] ApiDocPreview succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
     Please click here to preview with your @microsoft account. 
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    NewApiVersionRequired reason:

    A service’s API is a contract with customers and is represented by using the api-version query parameter. Changes such as adding an optional property to a request/response or introducing a new operation is a change to the service’s contract and therefore requires a new api-version value. This is critically important for documentation, client libraries, and customer support.

    EXAMPLE: if a customer calls a service in the public cloud using api-version=2020-07-27, the new property or operation may exist but if they call the service in a government cloud, air-gapped cloud, or Azure Stack Hub cloud using the same api-version, the property or operation may not exist. Because there is no clear relationship between the service api-version and the new property/operation, customers can’t trust the documentation and Azure customer have difficulty helping customers diagnose issues. In addition, each client library version documents the service version it supports. When an optional property or new operation is added to a service and its Swagger, new client libraries must be produced to expose this functionality to customers. Without updating the api-version, it is unclear to customers which version of a client library supports these new features.

    "default": {
    "description": "Error response describing why the operation failed.",
    "schema": {
    "$ref": "#/definitions/SmartDetectorErrorResponse"
    Copy link
    Contributor

    @akning-ms akning-ms Dec 22, 2020

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    This error response is different from ARM's guideline. so that is why cause Linter error R4007,
    But if your service already implement error response like what your define in SmartDetectorErrorResponse. to keep consistent, we can suppress it

    Copy link
    Contributor Author

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    We need to keep the error response consistent , can you please suppress this error? @akning-ms

    @openapi-workflow-bot openapi-workflow-bot bot added the WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required label Dec 22, 2020
    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    Hi, @napolish your PR are labelled with WaitForARMFeedback. A notification email will be sent out shortly afterwards to notify ARM review board([email protected]). cc @lirenhe

    @akning-ms
    Copy link
    Contributor

    @ArcturusZhang to take a look the GO sdk breaking change

    @ArcturusZhang
    Copy link
    Member

    @ArcturusZhang to take a look the GO sdk breaking change

    The breaking changes in go SDK are fine and expected

    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    Hi @napolish, one or multiple breaking change(s) is detected in your PR. Please check out the breaking change(s), and provide business justification in the PR comment and @ PR assignee why you must have these change(s), and how external customer impact can be mitigated. Please ensure to follow breaking change policy to request breaking change review and approval before proceeding swagger PR review.
    Action: To initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.
    If you want to know the production traffic statistic, please see ARM Traffic statistic.
    If you think it is false positive breaking change, please provide the reasons in the PR comment, report to Swagger Tooling Team via https://aka.ma/swaggerfeedback.

    @jorgecotillo jorgecotillo added ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review and removed WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required labels Dec 30, 2020
    @jorgecotillo
    Copy link
    Contributor

    Approved from ARM side.

    @ghost
    Copy link

    ghost commented Jan 17, 2021

    Hi, @napolish. Your PR has no update for 14 days and it is marked as stale PR. If no further update for over 14 days, the bot will close the PR. If you want to refresh the PR, please remove no-recent-activity label.

    @ghost ghost added the no-recent-activity label Jan 17, 2021
    @JeffreyRichter JeffreyRichter added the Approved-BreakingChange DO NOT USE! OBSOLETE label. See https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-tools/issues/6374 label Jan 19, 2021
    @ghost ghost removed the no-recent-activity label Jan 19, 2021
    @akning-ms akning-ms merged commit 742d12e into Azure:master Jan 25, 2021
    This was referenced Jan 25, 2021
    mkarmark pushed a commit to mkarmark/azure-rest-api-specs that referenced this pull request Jul 21, 2021
    * Adding patch operation  in 2019-03-01 API
    
    * Adding missing example file
    
    * Fixing api version in the example
    
    * Fixing parameter name
    
    * Removing properties that don't exist in AzureResource
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    Approved-BreakingChange DO NOT USE! OBSOLETE label. See https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-tools/issues/6374 ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review CI-BreakingChange-Go
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    6 participants