-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
aligned deivceSecurityGroups to stable #10774
Conversation
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
azure-sdk-for-java - Release
No readme.md specification configuration files were found that are associated with the files modified in this pull request, or swagger_to_sdk section in readme.md is not configured
|
azure-sdk-for-js - Release
|
azure-sdk-for-python - Release
- Breaking Change detected in SDK
|
azure-sdk-for-net - Release
|
azure-resource-manager-schemas - Release
|
azure-sdk-for-go - Release
|
azure-sdk-for-python-track2 - Release
No readme.md specification configuration files were found that are associated with the files modified in this pull request, or swagger_to_sdk section in readme.md is not configured
|
Azure CLI Extension Generation - Release
No readme.md specification configuration files were found that are associated with the files modified in this pull request, or swagger_to_sdk section in readme.md is not configured
|
Trenton Generation - Release
No readme.md specification configuration files were found that are associated with the files modified in this pull request, or swagger_to_sdk section in readme.md is not configured
|
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ | |||
"info": { | |||
"title": "Security Center", | |||
"description": "API spec for Microsoft.Security (Azure Security Center) resource provider", | |||
"version": "2017-08-01-preview" | |||
"version": "2019-08-01" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please move this change to a new folder 2019-08-01
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @NullMDR
This PR actually does not change the API contract and doesn't contain breaking changes.
The same changes were already made to the stable
version a few months back (see discussion in PR: #8820), since the original swagger started to break the SDK generation (the preview
version remained untouched in that PR).
Now, the preview
version started to break other, unrelated PRs (see: #10418 (comment)) (ones that add new resource types). So this PR fixes the preview
version the same way the stable
version was fixed (again, no actual API changes are made).
Thanks for reviewing 🙂
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@NullMDR just realized what you actually meant... 😬
The API version was changed by mistake. I've reverted that change (my other general comments still stand though 😅)
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
Hi @liranc you are trying to introduce breaking change for preview api over 1 year. Please follow breaking change policy https://dev.azure.com/msazure/AzureWiki/_wiki/wikis/AzureWiki.wiki/43942/Policy-for-Breaking-Changes |
@NullMDR we actually had the same discussion in this PR: #8820 🙂 (the changes in this PR as the same). The latest version of the swagger results in an error when attempt to generate code using AutoRest. |
* aligned deivceSecurityGroups to stable * Fix tests * Fixed api version Co-authored-by: Liran Chen <[email protected]>
MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.
Contribution checklist:
If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.
ARM API Review Checklist
Ensure to check this box if one of the following scenarios meet updates in the PR, so that label “WaitForARMFeedback” will be added automatically to involve ARM API Review. Failure to comply may result in delays for manifest application. Note this does not apply to data plane APIs, all “removals” and “adding a new property” no more require ARM API review.
If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.
Breaking Change Review Checklist
If there are following updates in the PR, ensure to request an approval from API Review Board as defined in the Breaking Change Policy.
Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.