Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Hub Generated] Review request for Microsoft.AzureStackHCI to add version preview/2020-03-01-preview #10115

Conversation

mbialecka
Copy link
Contributor

@mbialecka mbialecka commented Jul 13, 2020

This is a PR generated at OpenAPI Hub. You can view your work branch via this link.

Contribution checklist:

If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.

ARM API Review Checklist

  • Service team MUST add the "WaitForARMFeedback" label if the management plane API changes fall into one of the below categories.
  • adding/removing APIs.
  • adding/removing properties.
  • adding/removing API-version.
  • adding a new service in Azure.

Failure to comply may result in delays for manifest application. Note this does not apply to data plane APIs.

  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged urgently, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.

Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.

@openapi-pipeline-app
Copy link

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Jul 13, 2020

[Staging] Swagger Validation Report

️✔️BreakingChange [Detail]
 There are no breaking changes. 
️✔️LintDiff [Detail]
 Validation passes for LintDiff. 
Avocado: 1 Errors, 0 Warnings [Detail] [Expand]
Rule Message
INCONSISTENT_API_VERSION The API version of the swagger is inconsistent with its file path.
readme: specification/azurestackhci/resource-manager/readme.md
json: common-types/resource-management/v2/types.json
Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@openapi-sdkautomation
Copy link

openapi-sdkautomation bot commented Jul 13, 2020

azure-sdk-for-python - Release

⚠️ warning [Logs] [Expand Details]
  • ⚠️ Generate from e640f74 with merge commit b8a63f5. SDK Automation 13.0.17.20200619.4
    Failed to find any changed packages. Please check the changed file list.
    /z/work/azure-sdk-for-python/sdk/azure-mgmt/azurestackhci/__init__.py
    /z/work/azure-sdk-for-python/sdk/azure-mgmt/azurestackhci/_azure_stack_hci_client.py
    /z/work/azure-sdk-for-python/sdk/azure-mgmt/azurestackhci/_configuration.py
    /z/work/azure-sdk-for-python/sdk/azure-mgmt/azurestackhci/models/__init__.py
    /z/work/azure-sdk-for-python/sdk/azure-mgmt/azurestackhci/models/_azure_stack_hci_client_enums.py
    /z/work/azure-sdk-for-python/sdk/azure-mgmt/azurestackhci/models/_models.py
    /z/work/azure-sdk-for-python/sdk/azure-mgmt/azurestackhci/models/_models_py3.py
    /z/work/azure-sdk-for-python/sdk/azure-mgmt/azurestackhci/models/_paged_models.py
    /z/work/azure-sdk-for-python/sdk/azure-mgmt/azurestackhci/operations/__init__.py
    /z/work/azure-sdk-for-python/sdk/azure-mgmt/azurestackhci/operations/_clusters_operations.py
    /z/work/azure-sdk-for-python/sdk/azure-mgmt/azurestackhci/operations/_operations.py
    /z/work/azure-sdk-for-python/sdk/azure-mgmt/azurestackhci/version.py

@openapi-sdkautomation
Copy link

openapi-sdkautomation bot commented Jul 13, 2020

azure-sdk-for-js - Release

⚠️ warning [Logs] [Expand Details]
  • ⚠️ Generate from e640f74 with merge commit b8a63f5. SDK Automation 13.0.17.20200619.4
    Failed to find any diff after autorest so no changed packages was found.

@openapi-sdkautomation
Copy link

openapi-sdkautomation bot commented Jul 13, 2020

azure-sdk-for-net - Release

No readme.md specification configuration files were found that are associated with the files modified in this pull request, or swagger_to_sdk section in readme.md is not configured

@openapi-sdkautomation
Copy link

openapi-sdkautomation bot commented Jul 13, 2020

azure-sdk-for-java - Release

⚠️ warning [Logs] [Expand Details]
  • ⚠️ Generate from e640f74 with merge commit b8a63f5. SDK Automation 13.0.17.20200619.4
    Failed to find any diff after autorest so no changed packages was found.

@openapi-sdkautomation
Copy link

openapi-sdkautomation bot commented Jul 13, 2020

azure-sdk-for-go - Release

️✔️ succeeded [Logs] [Expand Details]

@openapi-sdkautomation
Copy link

openapi-sdkautomation bot commented Jul 13, 2020

Azure CLI Extension Generation - Release

No readme.md specification configuration files were found that are associated with the files modified in this pull request, or swagger_to_sdk section in readme.md is not configured

@openapi-sdkautomation
Copy link

openapi-sdkautomation bot commented Jul 13, 2020

Trenton Generation - Release

No readme.md specification configuration files were found that are associated with the files modified in this pull request, or swagger_to_sdk section in readme.md is not configured

@mbialecka
Copy link
Contributor Author

The previous spec version was approved in the private repo:
https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs-pr/pull/1102
https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs-pr/pull/1206

Changes introduced in this PR:

  • New values for status enum
  • Updated examples

@azuresdkci
Copy link
Contributor

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@openapi-assignment-bot openapi-assignment-bot bot added the WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required label Jul 14, 2020
@mbialecka
Copy link
Contributor Author

@xccc-msft Is there anything I need to do to move the process to completion?

@chiragg4u
Copy link
Contributor

Please go through the contribution checklist added as part of the review and mark them completed to confirm that you’ve gone through the required documentation.

@chiragg4u chiragg4u removed the WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required label Jul 14, 2020
@openapi-assignment-bot openapi-assignment-bot bot added the WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required label Jul 14, 2020
@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@mbialecka mbialecka removed the WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required label Jul 14, 2020
@openapi-sdkautomation
Copy link

openapi-sdkautomation bot commented Jul 14, 2020

azure-sdk-for-python-track2 - Release

No readme.md specification configuration files were found that are associated with the files modified in this pull request, or swagger_to_sdk section in readme.md is not configured

@openapi-assignment-bot openapi-assignment-bot bot added the WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required label Jul 14, 2020
@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@mbialecka mbialecka removed the WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required label Jul 14, 2020
@mbialecka
Copy link
Contributor Author

@xccc-msft Please help with resolving linter errors. I've requested suppression for "R3020 - PathResourceProviderNamePascalCase". I don't know what I am missing with "R4007 - DefaultErrorResponseSchema".

@xseeseesee
Copy link
Contributor

@akning-ms @NullMDR Can you please advise how to resolve the errors? Thanks.

@mbialecka mbialecka force-pushed the dev-azurestackhci-Microsoft.AzureStackHCI-2020-03-01-preview branch from 19e5253 to e640f74 Compare July 16, 2020 21:07
@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@mbialecka
Copy link
Contributor Author

mbialecka commented Jul 16, 2020

@xccc-msft I fixed the linter errors but now avocado fails. Please advise how to proceed. I need to complete this as soon as possible.

@xseeseesee
Copy link
Contributor

@mbialecka Any reason you removed the WaitForARMFeedback? It's required to wait for ARM review as you are adding new service/APIs.

@akning-ms
Copy link
Contributor

@mbialecka, the avocado error can be ignore as it is common file. but just noticed the Python & JS & Java SDK generation fail which may what you need. you can see here: #10115 (comment)
@NullMDR to help to take a look

@mbialecka
Copy link
Contributor Author

@xccc-msft I confirmed with ARM that a new review is not needed as it was completed in the private repo (I linked to the previous PRs in the private repo). Since avocado error can be ignored, can you merge in the PR?

@xseeseesee xseeseesee merged commit b8a63f5 into Azure:master Jul 17, 2020
00Kai0 pushed a commit to 00Kai0/azure-rest-api-specs that referenced this pull request Oct 12, 2020
…sion preview/2020-03-01-preview (Azure#10115)

* New Readme Config File

* New Go Language Readme Config File

* New Typescript Language Readme Config File

* New Python Language Readme Config File

* New C# Language Readme Config File

* New Ruby Language Readme Config File

* New Swagger Spec File

* New Swagger Example Spec File

* Add AzureStackHCI spec

* Prettify

* Fix error schema

* Fix error schema

* Suppress R3020

* Fix R4006
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants