-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add odatatype for Url Signing Action #10017
Conversation
You don't have permission to trigger SDK Automation. |
[Staging] Swagger Validation Report
️✔️ |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
/openapibot sdkautomation |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
3 similar comments
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
azure-sdk-for-go - Release
|
azure-sdk-for-java - Release
|
azure-sdk-for-net - Release
|
Trenton Generation - Release
No readme.md specification configuration files were found that are associated with the files modified in this pull request, or swagger_to_sdk section in readme.md is not configured
|
azure-sdk-for-js - Release
|
Azure CLI Extension Generation - Release
No readme.md specification configuration files were found that are associated with the files modified in this pull request, or swagger_to_sdk section in readme.md is not configured
|
azure-sdk-for-python - Release
|
azure-sdk-for-python-track2 - Release
No readme.md specification configuration files were found that are associated with the files modified in this pull request, or swagger_to_sdk section in readme.md is not configured
|
@gubalasu is this property readonly? |
This is a property that the customers have to supply when they are making this call. And the value of the property is the one mentioned in the enum. I am not very sure what you meant by readonly. But I hope this answers your question |
@gubalasu readonly means the property could only be return by service, and could not change by the client side. Since there is only one possible value for the enum, (And could not add new enum value due to it is not modelAsString) I think it is no need for the sending by client side. |
We are checking for the odatatype in the Resource Provider. We do this because the action can have multiple different types. One such type is UrlSigning. For other action types we have different odatatype and they are defined seperately. So this field is a required field. |
* Add odatatype for Url Signing Action * Fix typo
MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.
Contribution checklist:
If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.
ARM API Review Checklist
Failure to comply may result in delays for manifest application. Note this does not apply to data plane APIs.
Please follow the link to find more details on API review process.