Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Enhanced Http] Resolve proxying port on worker side #1461

Merged

Conversation

satvu
Copy link
Member

@satvu satvu commented Apr 11, 2023

Issue describing the changes in this PR

resolves #1419. Includes refactoring for handling IActionResult. SampleApp Program.cs code set to enhanced-http sample for development.

Pull request checklist

  • My changes do not require documentation changes
    • Otherwise: Documentation issue linked to PR
  • My changes should not be added to the release notes for the next release
    • Otherwise: I've added my notes to release_notes.md
  • My changes do not need to be backported to a previous version
    • Otherwise: Backport tracked by issue/PR #issue_or_pr
  • I have added all required tests (Unit tests, E2E tests)

Additional information

Additional PR information

@satvu satvu requested a review from brettsam April 11, 2023 15:50
@satvu satvu marked this pull request as ready for review April 11, 2023 16:06

namespace Microsoft.Azure.Functions.Worker.Extensions.Http.AspNetCore
{
internal static class HttpUriProvider
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Temporary - this is needed since the two locations that use it (worker and host builder extensions) both need access to it. Will likely be removed when the extensions issue (we want just one extension call) is resolved.

@satvu satvu requested a review from fabiocav April 11, 2023 21:45
@satvu satvu merged commit 5595e5d into feature/enhanced-http Apr 13, 2023
@satvu satvu deleted the satvu/feature/enhanced-http/resolve-proxy-port branch April 13, 2023 14:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants