Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support missing configuration for databricks workspace module #221

Conversation

jdocampo
Copy link
Member

Improvements:

  • Refactor module into folder to accommodate for future databricks modules (e.g. access connector)
  • Added missing configurations
    • General
      • DBFS account name & tier
      • Machine Learning Workspace Id
    • Encryption
      • Customer managed encryption properties (managed resources and disk)
      • Customer managed key encryption (dbfs)
      • Infrastructure encryption
    • No Public IP / NPIP
      • Resource ID of the Outbound Load balancer Backend Address Pool
      • NAT Gateway name
  • Added output values to match azurerm module
  • Add encryption to module test
  • Add missing private endpoint for DBFS storage account
  • Add support for webauth mode in private link deployment type

@jdocampo jdocampo linked an issue Mar 28, 2023 that may be closed by this pull request
@jdocampo jdocampo temporarily deployed to acctests March 28, 2023 21:19 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@jdocampo jdocampo requested a review from murggu March 28, 2023 21:45
@jdocampo jdocampo marked this pull request as ready for review March 28, 2023 21:46
@murggu murggu merged commit 13b367e into main Mar 29, 2023
@murggu murggu deleted the jdc/218-support-missing-configuration-for-databricks-workspace-module branch March 29, 2023 07:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Support missing configuration for Databricks workspace module
2 participants