Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support body string in protocol client #1062

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 22, 2021

Conversation

jianghaolu
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@jianghaolu jianghaolu requested a review from srnagar as a code owner June 18, 2021 23:16
Copy link
Member

@weidongxu-microsoft weidongxu-microsoft left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I seems not able to find RequestOptions class in core.

@jianghaolu
Copy link
Contributor Author

@weidongxu-microsoft It's added here Azure/azure-sdk-for-java#22334

qwordy added a commit to qwordy/autorest.java that referenced this pull request Jun 21, 2021
@jianghaolu jianghaolu merged commit c539a85 into Azure:llc Jun 22, 2021
qwordy added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 1, 2021
* [Automation] Report

* [Automation] Report

* [Automation] Report

* Paging

* PagingAsync

* PagingAsync method

* ProtocolSyncPagingMethodTemplate

* PagingAsync method done

* ProtocolAsyncPagingSinglePageMethodTemplate

* log

* Filter group parameters in low level client methods, from #1062

* mapper, return type, paging method template

* Add imports for protocol paging

* PagingHelperMethods

* Fix a small issue

* client, wrapper methods

* Paging test

* module-info.java

* Remove stale code

* style

* Helper methods for paging

* Upgrade to Junit 5

* Add rawNextLinkName

* Add rawItemName; test

* test

* fix

* Robust code

Co-authored-by: Github Actions <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants