Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 11, 2023. It is now read-only.

SP with resource group level scope example #3077

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 24, 2018
Merged

SP with resource group level scope example #3077

merged 1 commit into from
May 24, 2018

Conversation

billpratt
Copy link
Contributor

What this PR does / why we need it:

Added example on how to create a service principal with a resource group level scope

Which issue this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close that issue when PR gets merged): fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

If applicable:

  • [ x ] documentation
  • unit tests
  • tested backward compatibility (ie. deploy with previous version, upgrade with this branch)

Release note:

@acs-bot
Copy link

acs-bot commented May 24, 2018

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
To fully approve this pull request, please assign additional approvers.
We suggest the following additional approver: brendandburns

Assign the PR to them by writing /assign @brendandburns in a comment when ready.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@acs-bot acs-bot added the size/S label May 24, 2018
@billpratt
Copy link
Contributor Author

/assign @brendandburns

Copy link
Contributor

@CecileRobertMichon CecileRobertMichon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@CecileRobertMichon
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @billpratt!

@CecileRobertMichon CecileRobertMichon merged commit d65c809 into Azure:master May 24, 2018
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants