Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[TS, C++] Provide hint to private kernel circuit on matching transient nullifiers with their commitments #837

Closed
Tracked by #1064
dbanks12 opened this issue Jun 13, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #2056
Assignees
Labels
C-protocol-circuits Component: Protocol circuits (kernel & rollup)

Comments

@dbanks12
Copy link
Collaborator

dbanks12 commented Jun 13, 2023

"reorder" arrays (see here for more info)

@dbanks12 dbanks12 added this to A3 Jun 13, 2023
@dbanks12 dbanks12 converted this from a draft issue Jun 13, 2023
@dbanks12 dbanks12 added the C-protocol-circuits Component: Protocol circuits (kernel & rollup) label Jun 13, 2023
@dbanks12 dbanks12 changed the title [TS] RPC Client should kernel regarding which nullifiers, commitments and readRequests match [TS] RPC Client should tell private kernel regarding which nullifiers, commitments and readRequests match Jun 13, 2023
@dbanks12 dbanks12 changed the title [TS] RPC Client should tell private kernel regarding which nullifiers, commitments and readRequests match [TS] RPC Client (or unconstrained C++ helper) should hint kernel regarding which nullifiers, commitments and readRequests match Jun 15, 2023
@dbanks12 dbanks12 changed the title [TS] RPC Client (or unconstrained C++ helper) should hint kernel regarding which nullifiers, commitments and readRequests match [TS] RPC Client (or unconstrained C++ helper) should hint ordering circuit regarding which nullifiers and commitments match Jun 16, 2023
@dbanks12 dbanks12 changed the title [TS] RPC Client (or unconstrained C++ helper) should hint ordering circuit regarding which nullifiers and commitments match [TS, C++] Provide hint to private kernel circuit on matching transient nullifiers with their commitments Jul 14, 2023
@dbanks12 dbanks12 removed this from the 🚀 Initial Aztec Sandbox Release milestone Aug 7, 2023
@jeanmon jeanmon moved this from Todo to In Progress in A3 Sep 6, 2023
@jeanmon jeanmon moved this from In Progress to In Review in A3 Sep 6, 2023
jeanmon added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 6, 2023
Solves #837 

# Checklist:
Remove the checklist to signal you've completed it. Enable auto-merge if
the PR is ready to merge.
- [x] If the pull request requires a cryptography review (e.g.
cryptographic algorithm implementations) I have added the 'crypto' tag.
- [x] I have reviewed my diff in github, line by line and removed
unexpected formatting changes, testing logs, or commented-out code.
- [x] Every change is related to the PR description.
- [x] I have
[linked](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue)
this pull request to relevant issues (if any exist).
@jeanmon jeanmon moved this from In Review to Done in A3 Sep 6, 2023
@jeanmon jeanmon removed the status in A3 Sep 6, 2023
@jeanmon jeanmon moved this to Done in A3 Sep 6, 2023
@jeanmon jeanmon closed this as completed Sep 6, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
C-protocol-circuits Component: Protocol circuits (kernel & rollup)
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants