Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Expose addAccount api as Aztec CLI command #1527

Closed
PhilWindle opened this issue Aug 11, 2023 · 2 comments · Fixed by #1524
Closed

Expose addAccount api as Aztec CLI command #1527

PhilWindle opened this issue Aug 11, 2023 · 2 comments · Fixed by #1524
Assignees
Labels
T-feature-request Type: Adding a brand new feature (not to be confused with improving an existing feature).

Comments

@PhilWindle
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@PhilWindle PhilWindle added this to A3 Aug 11, 2023
@PhilWindle PhilWindle converted this from a draft issue Aug 11, 2023
@PhilWindle PhilWindle changed the title Expose addAccount api as Aztec LI command Expose addAccount api as Aztec CLI command Aug 11, 2023
@iAmMichaelConnor iAmMichaelConnor added the T-feature-request Type: Adding a brand new feature (not to be confused with improving an existing feature). label Aug 14, 2023
@spalladino
Copy link
Collaborator

Consider naming as register-recipient

@PhilWindle
Copy link
Collaborator Author

PhilWindle commented Aug 14, 2023 via email

@spalladino spalladino moved this from Todo to In Review in A3 Aug 15, 2023
benesjan added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 15, 2023
1. Fixes #1516 
2. Fixes #1527
3. Fixes #1529 
4. Documents `e2e_aztec_js_browser`.
5. Fixes unexpected "previous test run dependency" in
e2e_aztec.js_browser test.
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In Review to Done in A3 Aug 15, 2023
codygunton pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jan 23, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
T-feature-request Type: Adding a brand new feature (not to be confused with improving an existing feature).
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants