Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow manual override of site intersection results #1724

Closed
chrisala opened this issue Dec 14, 2018 · 1 comment
Closed

Allow manual override of site intersection results #1724

chrisala opened this issue Dec 14, 2018 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@chrisala
Copy link
Collaborator

chrisala commented Dec 14, 2018

See: https://support.ehelp.edu.au/a/tickets/213046

There are cases where MERIT site data is poor quality or insufficient to correctly determine the project's primary electorate and state.
Additionally, newly loaded projects do not have any site data associated with them which makes it difficult to do some kinds of reporting for those projects.

For this situation, we need to allow the user to be able to manually specify this data, and also override the algorithm that determines the primary/other states/electorates.

The changes needed are:

  • Add a menu item to the Project Admin tab that allows the user to specify the primary and other electorates and states. There should also be a checkbox to specify that this information should override the algorithmic assignment of these fields. This menu item should only be available to FC_ADMINS. It should display/save the data to the same location as the project load routine (geographicInfo). The available sites/electorates should be selectable via a searchable dropdown menu (select2)
  • Include the override flag in the project and electorate coord downloads
  • Modify the algorithm for the coord download to select the primary and other electorates from the manually supplied information if the override flag is set, otherwise use the existing algorithm. Leave both sets of columns (the geographic info and the MERIT assignment) on the project download so it's available for comparison/testing in the future.
  • Add fields to the header of the project page that displays this information. Include help text with a suitable explanation for what it means (to be provided). This field should be visible to everyone.
@chrisala chrisala added the Sites label Jul 12, 2023
@chrisala chrisala added this to the 4.1 milestone Sep 27, 2024
temi added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 31, 2024
- ui to enter states/electorates manually and supporting code
temi added a commit to AtlasOfLivingAustralia/ecodata that referenced this issue Oct 31, 2024
- manual project geographic information ui support
- spatial object name standardisation
chrisala added a commit to AtlasOfLivingAustralia/ecodata that referenced this issue Oct 31, 2024
chrisala added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 31, 2024
ui to enter states/electorates manually and supporting code #1724
temi added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 1, 2024
- added statewide property
- added behaviour changes based on national and statewide selection
- electorate selection automatically adds its states
temi added a commit to AtlasOfLivingAustralia/ecodata that referenced this issue Nov 1, 2024
- added intersectWith to find states of an electorate
- added statewide field
- updated script to standardise project geographicInfo fields
temi added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 1, 2024
- added text for national project
temi added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 3, 2024
- fixes a test fail
temi added a commit to AtlasOfLivingAustralia/ecodata that referenced this issue Nov 5, 2024
- fixed an error with query
temi added a commit to AtlasOfLivingAustralia/ecodata that referenced this issue Nov 5, 2024
- title case for spatial names
@temi
Copy link
Contributor

temi commented Nov 7, 2024

Blaz tested and passed. 7/11/24
https://support.ehelp.edu.au/helpdesk/tickets/217044

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants