Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(core-database): transaction filter multipayment recipientId #3810

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 18, 2020

Conversation

rainydio
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

Fixed typo when searching recipientId in multipayment transactions. It's asset.payments, not asset.payment.

  • Tests
  • Ready to be merged

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 18, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #3810 into develop will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #3810   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    97.28%   97.28%           
========================================
  Files          617      617           
  Lines        13908    13908           
  Branches      1631     1631           
========================================
  Hits         13531    13531           
  Misses         117      117           
  Partials       260      260           
Flag Coverage Δ
#functional 6.43% <ø> (ø)
#integration 10.19% <ø> (ø)
#unit 95.26% <ø> (ø)
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
packages/core-database/src/transaction-filter.ts 100.00% <ø> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 3e292ee...1f7c1dd. Read the comment docs.

@faustbrian faustbrian merged commit 70700fa into develop Jun 18, 2020
@ghost ghost deleted the fix/core-database/transaction-filter branch June 18, 2020 01:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants