Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(core-api): return block timestamp for v2 transactions #2906

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 4, 2019

Conversation

spkjp
Copy link
Contributor

@spkjp spkjp commented Sep 3, 2019

A summary of what changes this PR introduces and why they were made.

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

  • Bugfix
  • Feature
  • Refactor
  • Performance
  • Tests
  • Build
  • Documentation
  • Code style update
  • Continuous Integration
  • Other, please describe:

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

Does this PR release a new version?

  • Yes
  • No

If yes, please describe the impact and migration path for existing applications:

The PR fulfills these requirements:

  • It's submitted to the develop branch, not the master branch
  • All tests are passing
  • New/updated tests are included

If adding a new feature, the PR's description includes:

  • A convincing reason for adding this feature (to avoid wasting your time, it's best to open a suggestion issue first and wait for approval before working on it)

@spkjp spkjp force-pushed the fix/core-api/timestamp branch from 815cd71 to 3547cf6 Compare September 4, 2019 00:19
@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #2906 into develop will increase coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #2906      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    68.08%   68.09%   +<.01%     
===========================================
  Files          405      405              
  Lines         9733     9734       +1     
  Branches       502      461      -41     
===========================================
+ Hits          6627     6628       +1     
- Misses        3065     3069       +4     
+ Partials        41       37       -4
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
.../core-api/src/handlers/transactions/transformer.ts 100% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
packages/core-api/src/handlers/utils.ts 74.07% <0%> (ø) ⬆️
packages/core-logger-winston/src/formatter.ts 41.66% <0%> (ø) ⬆️
...es/core-blockchain/src/replay/replay-blockchain.ts 0% <0%> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 33d8ba7...3547cf6. Read the comment docs.

@faustbrian faustbrian merged commit 9c4a746 into develop Sep 4, 2019
@ghost ghost deleted the fix/core-api/timestamp branch September 4, 2019 02:20
vasild added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 5, 2019
…k-chained-verbose

* ArkEcosystem/core/develop:
  test: mock missing wsServer
  release: 2.5.24 (#2908)
  fix(core-p2p): terminate blocked client connections
  fix(core-p2p): drop connections with malformed messages
  fix(core-api): return block timestamp for v2 transactions (#2906)
  fix(core-blockchain): only shift milestoneHeights[] if at that height (#2904)
  fix(crypto): use `anyOf` for transactions schema (#2894)
  fix(core-webhooks): cast params in condition checks (#2887)
  feat(core-p2p): use compression on the p2p level (#2886)
vasild added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 5, 2019
…ly-chained-check

* ArkEcosystem/core/develop:
  test: mock missing wsServer
  release: 2.5.24 (#2908)
  fix(core-p2p): terminate blocked client connections
  fix(core-p2p): drop connections with malformed messages
  fix(core-api): return block timestamp for v2 transactions (#2906)
  fix(core-blockchain): only shift milestoneHeights[] if at that height (#2904)
  fix(crypto): use `anyOf` for transactions schema (#2894)
  fix(core-webhooks): cast params in condition checks (#2887)
  feat(core-p2p): use compression on the p2p level (#2886)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants