-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 37
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
OAuth2 Implicit flow #2
Comments
Currently, the implicit flow is not implemented. It would be helpful if you give me a description, how this is used (response_code id_token vs. token). In my current environment, I do not use this flow. I need to build up a valid test. |
Implicit flow doesn't use the secret, provide only an access_token (but no refresh token). I'll prepare some information what should probably be added/changed to support it. |
I think it's enough to change the response type to token e.g. The token can then be send in the I've setup an AAD Test App
From my understanding it's secure to share that information, as it only allows an user to request a token for this own account. I don't need to share the secret, and there is no risk to loose the related refresh token. |
I released a new version with implicit flow. Can you please test. |
Great work, from my pov oauth2 support is now perfect. |
It seems that the implicit flow isn't implemented. Do you have any plans to add that as well? That just became a blocker for our pm migration.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: