Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: preserve comments and formatting in yml #1468

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Oct 25, 2024
Merged

Conversation

saravmajestic
Copy link
Collaborator

@saravmajestic saravmajestic commented Oct 16, 2024

Overview

Problem

  • In doc editor, comments are not preserved when saving the changes
  • When saving a new model/column, tests are not saved as data_tests, instead saved as tests in dbt1.8

Solution

  • Use parseDocument api from yaml library to preserve the metadata in yaml files. This will preserve the comments and other formatting
  • Pass right column name for identifying if tests should be saved as data_tests or tests

Screenshot/Demo

A picture is worth a thousand words. Please highlight the changes if applicable.

How to test

Checklist

  • I have run this code and it appears to resolve the stated issue
  • README.md updated and added information about my change

Important

Preserve comments in YAML files and correctly save test data in docsEditPanel.ts using parseDocument from YAML library.

  • Behavior:
    • Use parseDocument from YAML library in docsEditPanel.ts to preserve comments and formatting in YAML files.
    • Correctly save test data as data_tests or tests based on column name in docsEditPanel.ts.
  • Functions:
    • Add setOrDeleteInParsedDocument() and findEntityInParsedDoc() in docsEditPanel.ts to manage YAML document entities.
  • Misc:
    • Minor refactoring in altimateWebviewProvider.ts for code clarity.

This description was created by Ellipsis for 78f324f. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.


Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced new interfaces for improved documentation schema handling.
    • Enhanced YAML document parsing and manipulation capabilities.
    • Added new commands for better interaction with the webview.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error handling and user notifications in command processing.
  • Refactor

    • Restructured command handling logic for better clarity and consistency.
    • Streamlined methods for managing documentation data and YAML parsing.

Comment on lines +858 to +861
writeFileSync(
patchPath,
stringify(parsedDocFile, { lineWidth: 0 }),
);

Check failure

Code scanning / CodeQL

Potential file system race condition High

The file may have changed since it
was checked
.
});
break;
}
case "getTeammatesStatus": {
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

just minor formatting

@saravmajestic saravmajestic linked an issue Oct 21, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
1 task
@saravmajestic saravmajestic marked this pull request as ready for review October 21, 2024 02:17
@saravmajestic saravmajestic requested a review from mdesmet October 21, 2024 02:18
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 21, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces several new interfaces in the docGenService.ts file to enhance type definitions for documentation schemas. It adds DocumentationSchemaColumn, DocumentationSchemaModel, and DocumentationSchema interfaces, which define the structure of documentation-related data. Additionally, modifications in altimateWebviewProvider.ts restructure the command handling logic and add new commands, while docsEditPanel.ts enhances YAML document parsing and manipulation with new methods and improved logic for handling documentation data.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
src/services/docGenService.ts Added interfaces: DocumentationSchemaColumn, DocumentationSchemaModel, DocumentationSchema.
src/webview_provider/altimateWebviewProvider.ts Restructured handleCommand method; added commands: "validateCredentials", "sendTelemetryError".
src/webview_provider/docsEditPanel.ts Added methods: setOrDeleteInParsedDocument, findEntityInParsedDoc; modified resolveWebview for YAML parsing.

Possibly related PRs

  • fix: datapilot code block ui #1452: The changes in this PR involve the CodeBlock component, which may utilize the new DocumentationSchema and DocumentationSchemaColumn interfaces added in the main PR for structured documentation handling.

Suggested reviewers

  • anandgupta42
  • mdesmet

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Looks good to me! Reviewed everything up to 9a6c951 in 29 seconds

More details
  • Looked at 366 lines of code in 3 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 1 drafted comments based on config settings.
1. src/webview_provider/docsEditPanel.ts:866
  • Draft comment:
    Ensure stringify is consistently used with { lineWidth: 0 } to preserve formatting across all instances.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Comment did not seem useful.

Workflow ID: wflow_WTnZOyT0wWjI9lNf


You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
src/services/docGenService.ts (2)

25-31: LGTM! Consider adding JSDoc comments for better documentation.

The DocumentationSchemaColumn interface is well-structured and provides flexibility with its index signature. It covers the essential properties for a documentation column.

Consider adding JSDoc comments to describe the purpose of each property, especially for optional ones like data_type and quote. This would enhance the self-documentation of the code. For example:

export interface DocumentationSchemaColumn {
  /** The name of the column */
  name: string;
  /** A description of the column's purpose or contents */
  description: string;
  /** The data type of the column, if known */
  data_type?: string;
  /** Indicates if the column should be quoted in SQL queries */
  quote?: boolean;
  /** Allows for additional custom properties */
  [key: string]: unknown;
}

38-41: LGTM! Consider adding a type for the version number.

The DocumentationSchema interface provides a clear structure for the overall documentation schema. The inclusion of a version number is excellent for managing schema changes over time.

To improve clarity and type safety, consider specifying the type of the version property. If it's always expected to be an integer, you could use the number type. If it might include minor versions (e.g., 1.0, 1.1), consider using string. For example:

export interface DocumentationSchema {
  version: number; // or string, depending on your versioning scheme
  models: DocumentationSchemaModel[];
}

This small change will make the expected format of the version number more explicit to developers using this interface.

src/webview_provider/altimateWebviewProvider.ts (1)

246-255: LGTM: New command handlers enhance functionality

The addition of new command handlers for "validateCredentials", "sendTelemetryEvent", and "sendTelemetryError" enhances the functionality of the webview provider. These handlers correctly implement asynchronous operations and follow the existing pattern for sending responses back to the webview.

A minor suggestion for improvement:
Consider adding error handling for the "sendTelemetryEvent" and "sendTelemetryError" cases, similar to other cases in the handleCommand method. This would ensure consistent error handling across all commands.

Also applies to: 356-374

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8fec064 and 9a6c951.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • src/services/docGenService.ts (1 hunks)
  • src/webview_provider/altimateWebviewProvider.ts (1 hunks)
  • src/webview_provider/docsEditPanel.ts (4 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
src/webview_provider/docsEditPanel.ts

[error] 499-499: Change to an optional chain.

Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.

(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)

🪛 GitHub Check: CodeQL
src/webview_provider/docsEditPanel.ts

[failure] 864-867: Potential file system race condition
The file may have changed since it was checked.

🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/services/docGenService.ts (1)

25-41: Overall, these new interfaces enhance type safety and clarity.

The addition of DocumentationSchemaColumn, DocumentationSchemaModel, and DocumentationSchema interfaces provides a clear and structured way to handle documentation-related data. These changes will likely improve code maintainability and reduce potential errors when working with documentation schemas.

Key points:

  1. The interfaces provide a good foundation for working with documentation data.
  2. They align well with TypeScript best practices for type safety.
  3. Minor improvements, as suggested in previous comments, could further enhance their usability and clarity.

These changes positively impact the codebase by providing more robust type definitions for documentation-related structures, which should lead to fewer runtime errors and improved developer experience when working with these data structures.

src/webview_provider/altimateWebviewProvider.ts (2)

246-255: LGTM: Improved formatting for "getTeammatesStatus" case

The reformatting of the "getTeammatesStatus" case improves readability and consistency with other case statements in the handleCommand method. The logic remains unchanged, making this a beneficial style improvement.


246-255: Overall assessment: Positive improvements to AltimateWebviewProvider

The changes in this file enhance the AltimateWebviewProvider class by improving code consistency and adding new functionality. The modifications to the handleCommand method, including the reformatting of the "getTeammatesStatus" case and the addition of new command handlers, are well-implemented and align with the existing code structure.

These changes contribute to better maintainability and extend the capabilities of the webview provider, particularly in areas of credential validation and telemetry. The code remains clean and consistent with the rest of the file.

Also applies to: 356-374

src/webview_provider/docsEditPanel.ts (1)

864-867: Potential File System Race Condition

This code may introduce a file system race condition, as the file could change between reading and writing operations.

Refer to the previous review comments for details on addressing this issue.

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: CodeQL

[failure] 864-867: Potential file system race condition
The file may have changed since it was checked.

Comment on lines +32 to +37
interface DocumentationSchemaModel {
name: string;
description: string;
tests: any;
columns: [];
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Enhance type safety and utilize DocumentationSchemaColumn.

The DocumentationSchemaModel interface provides a good base structure for documentation models. However, there are a couple of areas where it can be improved:

  1. The tests property is currently of type any, which reduces type safety. Consider defining a more specific type for tests if possible.
  2. The columns property is an empty array, which doesn't take advantage of the DocumentationSchemaColumn interface defined earlier.

Consider applying the following changes to improve the interface:

interface DocumentationSchemaModel {
  name: string;
  description: string;
  tests: string[] | Record<string, unknown>; // Adjust based on the actual structure of tests
  columns: DocumentationSchemaColumn[];
}

This change will enhance type safety and ensure that the columns property correctly utilizes the DocumentationSchemaColumn interface.

Comment on lines +501 to +502
// @ts-ignore
(models.items.find(
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Avoid Suppressing TypeScript Errors with // @ts-ignore

Using // @ts-ignore suppresses TypeScript errors and may hide potential issues. It's recommended to address the underlying type incompatibilities.

Consider refining type definitions or adjusting the code to eliminate the need for // @ts-ignore.

| undefined,
predicate: (name: string) => boolean,
) {
if (models && models.items) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Simplify Conditional Check Using Optional Chaining

Consider using optional chaining to simplify the conditional check and improve code readability.

Apply this diff:

-if (models && models.items) {
+if (models?.items) {
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
if (models && models.items) {
if (models?.items) {
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome

[error] 499-499: Change to an optional chain.

Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.

(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)

Copy link
Contributor

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 78f324f in 13 seconds

More details
  • Looked at 21 lines of code in 1 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 1 drafted comments based on config settings.
1. src/webview_provider/docsEditPanel.ts:35
  • Draft comment:
    Remove unused imports parse and Document from the yaml library to clean up the code.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 50%
    The import statement has unnecessary imports that are not used in the code.

Workflow ID: wflow_DgsWt3dbzSzCzBxb


You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/webview_provider/docsEditPanel.ts (1)

491-494: Consider resolving the type incompatibility instead of using // @ts-ignore.

The // @ts-ignore comment suggests a type incompatibility. It's recommended to investigate and resolve this issue to improve type safety and maintainability. Consider using type guards or refining the types to eliminate the need for // @ts-ignore.

🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome

[error] 491-491: Change to an optional chain.

Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.

(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9a6c951 and 78f324f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/webview_provider/docsEditPanel.ts (4 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
src/webview_provider/docsEditPanel.ts

[error] 491-491: Change to an optional chain.

Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.

(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)

🪛 GitHub Check: CodeQL
src/webview_provider/docsEditPanel.ts

[failure] 856-859: Potential file system race condition
The file may have changed since it was checked.

🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/webview_provider/docsEditPanel.ts (2)

35-35: LGTM! Improved YAML handling with new imports and utility methods.

The addition of parseDocument, YAMLSeq, and YAMLMap imports from the yaml library, along with the new utility methods setOrDeleteInParsedDocument and findEntityInParsedDoc, significantly enhances the YAML document handling capabilities. These changes promote more robust and maintainable code for working with YAML structures.

Also applies to: 472-510


Line range hint 719-859: LGTM! Improved YAML handling and documentation structure in saveDocumentation.

The refactoring of the saveDocumentation method significantly improves the handling of YAML documents and the structure of documentation data. The use of parseDocument and the systematic approach to updating models and columns enhance the robustness and maintainability of the code. The separate handling of data_tests and tests aligns well with the changes required for dbt version 1.8 compatibility.

Comment on lines +856 to +859
writeFileSync(
patchPath,
stringify(parsedDocFile, { lineWidth: 0 }),
);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Potential file system race condition identified. The current writeFileSync usage does not implement atomic write operations or file locking mechanisms, which could lead to data corruption if multiple processes write to the same file simultaneously.

🔗 Analysis chain

Verify file system race condition.

There's a potential file system race condition when writing to the file. Consider implementing a file locking mechanism or using atomic write operations to prevent potential data corruption if multiple processes attempt to write to the same file simultaneously.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for file locking mechanisms or atomic write operations

# Test: Search for file locking or atomic write implementations
rg -n -A 5 -e 'fs\..*Lock' -e 'fs\..*Sync' -e 'atomicWrite'

Length of output: 1853

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: CodeQL

[failure] 856-859: Potential file system race condition
The file may have changed since it was checked.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Documentation Editor - Creating tests as "tests" instead of "data_tests"
2 participants