-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 96
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: preserve comments and formatting in yml #1468
Conversation
}); | ||
break; | ||
} | ||
case "getTeammatesStatus": { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
just minor formatting
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several new interfaces in the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍 Looks good to me! Reviewed everything up to 9a6c951 in 29 seconds
More details
- Looked at
366
lines of code in3
files - Skipped
0
files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1
drafted comments based on config settings.
1. src/webview_provider/docsEditPanel.ts:866
- Draft comment:
Ensurestringify
is consistently used with{ lineWidth: 0 }
to preserve formatting across all instances. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful.
Workflow ID: wflow_WTnZOyT0wWjI9lNf
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet
mode, and more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
src/services/docGenService.ts (2)
25-31
: LGTM! Consider adding JSDoc comments for better documentation.The
DocumentationSchemaColumn
interface is well-structured and provides flexibility with its index signature. It covers the essential properties for a documentation column.Consider adding JSDoc comments to describe the purpose of each property, especially for optional ones like
data_type
andquote
. This would enhance the self-documentation of the code. For example:export interface DocumentationSchemaColumn { /** The name of the column */ name: string; /** A description of the column's purpose or contents */ description: string; /** The data type of the column, if known */ data_type?: string; /** Indicates if the column should be quoted in SQL queries */ quote?: boolean; /** Allows for additional custom properties */ [key: string]: unknown; }
38-41
: LGTM! Consider adding a type for the version number.The
DocumentationSchema
interface provides a clear structure for the overall documentation schema. The inclusion of a version number is excellent for managing schema changes over time.To improve clarity and type safety, consider specifying the type of the
version
property. If it's always expected to be an integer, you could use thenumber
type. If it might include minor versions (e.g., 1.0, 1.1), consider usingstring
. For example:export interface DocumentationSchema { version: number; // or string, depending on your versioning scheme models: DocumentationSchemaModel[]; }This small change will make the expected format of the version number more explicit to developers using this interface.
src/webview_provider/altimateWebviewProvider.ts (1)
246-255
: LGTM: New command handlers enhance functionalityThe addition of new command handlers for "validateCredentials", "sendTelemetryEvent", and "sendTelemetryError" enhances the functionality of the webview provider. These handlers correctly implement asynchronous operations and follow the existing pattern for sending responses back to the webview.
A minor suggestion for improvement:
Consider adding error handling for the "sendTelemetryEvent" and "sendTelemetryError" cases, similar to other cases in thehandleCommand
method. This would ensure consistent error handling across all commands.Also applies to: 356-374
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- src/services/docGenService.ts (1 hunks)
- src/webview_provider/altimateWebviewProvider.ts (1 hunks)
- src/webview_provider/docsEditPanel.ts (4 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
src/webview_provider/docsEditPanel.ts
[error] 499-499: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
🪛 GitHub Check: CodeQL
src/webview_provider/docsEditPanel.ts
[failure] 864-867: Potential file system race condition
The file may have changed since it was checked.
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/services/docGenService.ts (1)
25-41
: Overall, these new interfaces enhance type safety and clarity.The addition of
DocumentationSchemaColumn
,DocumentationSchemaModel
, andDocumentationSchema
interfaces provides a clear and structured way to handle documentation-related data. These changes will likely improve code maintainability and reduce potential errors when working with documentation schemas.Key points:
- The interfaces provide a good foundation for working with documentation data.
- They align well with TypeScript best practices for type safety.
- Minor improvements, as suggested in previous comments, could further enhance their usability and clarity.
These changes positively impact the codebase by providing more robust type definitions for documentation-related structures, which should lead to fewer runtime errors and improved developer experience when working with these data structures.
src/webview_provider/altimateWebviewProvider.ts (2)
246-255
: LGTM: Improved formatting for "getTeammatesStatus" caseThe reformatting of the "getTeammatesStatus" case improves readability and consistency with other case statements in the
handleCommand
method. The logic remains unchanged, making this a beneficial style improvement.
246-255
: Overall assessment: Positive improvements to AltimateWebviewProviderThe changes in this file enhance the
AltimateWebviewProvider
class by improving code consistency and adding new functionality. The modifications to thehandleCommand
method, including the reformatting of the "getTeammatesStatus" case and the addition of new command handlers, are well-implemented and align with the existing code structure.These changes contribute to better maintainability and extend the capabilities of the webview provider, particularly in areas of credential validation and telemetry. The code remains clean and consistent with the rest of the file.
Also applies to: 356-374
src/webview_provider/docsEditPanel.ts (1)
864-867
: Potential File System Race ConditionThis code may introduce a file system race condition, as the file could change between reading and writing operations.
Refer to the previous review comments for details on addressing this issue.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: CodeQL
[failure] 864-867: Potential file system race condition
The file may have changed since it was checked.
interface DocumentationSchemaModel { | ||
name: string; | ||
description: string; | ||
tests: any; | ||
columns: []; | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Enhance type safety and utilize DocumentationSchemaColumn
.
The DocumentationSchemaModel
interface provides a good base structure for documentation models. However, there are a couple of areas where it can be improved:
- The
tests
property is currently of typeany
, which reduces type safety. Consider defining a more specific type for tests if possible. - The
columns
property is an empty array, which doesn't take advantage of theDocumentationSchemaColumn
interface defined earlier.
Consider applying the following changes to improve the interface:
interface DocumentationSchemaModel {
name: string;
description: string;
tests: string[] | Record<string, unknown>; // Adjust based on the actual structure of tests
columns: DocumentationSchemaColumn[];
}
This change will enhance type safety and ensure that the columns
property correctly utilizes the DocumentationSchemaColumn
interface.
// @ts-ignore | ||
(models.items.find( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Avoid Suppressing TypeScript Errors with // @ts-ignore
Using // @ts-ignore
suppresses TypeScript errors and may hide potential issues. It's recommended to address the underlying type incompatibilities.
Consider refining type definitions or adjusting the code to eliminate the need for // @ts-ignore
.
| undefined, | ||
predicate: (name: string) => boolean, | ||
) { | ||
if (models && models.items) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Simplify Conditional Check Using Optional Chaining
Consider using optional chaining to simplify the conditional check and improve code readability.
Apply this diff:
-if (models && models.items) {
+if (models?.items) {
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
if (models && models.items) { | |
if (models?.items) { |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 499-499: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 78f324f in 13 seconds
More details
- Looked at
21
lines of code in1
files - Skipped
0
files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1
drafted comments based on config settings.
1. src/webview_provider/docsEditPanel.ts:35
- Draft comment:
Remove unused importsparse
andDocument
from the yaml library to clean up the code. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%
The import statement has unnecessary imports that are not used in the code.
Workflow ID: wflow_DgsWt3dbzSzCzBxb
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet
mode, and more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/webview_provider/docsEditPanel.ts (1)
491-494
: Consider resolving the type incompatibility instead of using// @ts-ignore
.The
// @ts-ignore
comment suggests a type incompatibility. It's recommended to investigate and resolve this issue to improve type safety and maintainability. Consider using type guards or refining the types to eliminate the need for// @ts-ignore
.🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 491-491: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- src/webview_provider/docsEditPanel.ts (4 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
src/webview_provider/docsEditPanel.ts
[error] 491-491: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
🪛 GitHub Check: CodeQL
src/webview_provider/docsEditPanel.ts
[failure] 856-859: Potential file system race condition
The file may have changed since it was checked.
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/webview_provider/docsEditPanel.ts (2)
35-35
: LGTM! Improved YAML handling with new imports and utility methods.The addition of
parseDocument
,YAMLSeq
, andYAMLMap
imports from theyaml
library, along with the new utility methodssetOrDeleteInParsedDocument
andfindEntityInParsedDoc
, significantly enhances the YAML document handling capabilities. These changes promote more robust and maintainable code for working with YAML structures.Also applies to: 472-510
Line range hint
719-859
: LGTM! Improved YAML handling and documentation structure insaveDocumentation
.The refactoring of the
saveDocumentation
method significantly improves the handling of YAML documents and the structure of documentation data. The use ofparseDocument
and the systematic approach to updating models and columns enhance the robustness and maintainability of the code. The separate handling ofdata_tests
andtests
aligns well with the changes required for dbt version 1.8 compatibility.
writeFileSync( | ||
patchPath, | ||
stringify(parsedDocFile, { lineWidth: 0 }), | ||
); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
Potential file system race condition identified. The current writeFileSync
usage does not implement atomic write operations or file locking mechanisms, which could lead to data corruption if multiple processes write to the same file simultaneously.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify file system race condition.
There's a potential file system race condition when writing to the file. Consider implementing a file locking mechanism or using atomic write operations to prevent potential data corruption if multiple processes attempt to write to the same file simultaneously.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for file locking mechanisms or atomic write operations
# Test: Search for file locking or atomic write implementations
rg -n -A 5 -e 'fs\..*Lock' -e 'fs\..*Sync' -e 'atomicWrite'
Length of output: 1853
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: CodeQL
[failure] 856-859: Potential file system race condition
The file may have changed since it was checked.
Overview
Problem
Solution
parseDocument
api from yaml library to preserve the metadata in yaml files. This will preserve the comments and other formattingScreenshot/Demo
A picture is worth a thousand words. Please highlight the changes if applicable.
How to test
Checklist
README.md
updated and added information about my changeImportant
Preserve comments in YAML files and correctly save test data in
docsEditPanel.ts
usingparseDocument
from YAML library.parseDocument
from YAML library indocsEditPanel.ts
to preserve comments and formatting in YAML files.data_tests
ortests
based on column name indocsEditPanel.ts
.setOrDeleteInParsedDocument()
andfindEntityInParsedDoc()
indocsEditPanel.ts
to manage YAML document entities.altimateWebviewProvider.ts
for code clarity.This description was created by for 78f324f. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Refactor