Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: add check for backend connectivity while validating credentials #1443

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 3, 2024

Conversation

AdiGajbhiye
Copy link
Collaborator

@AdiGajbhiye AdiGajbhiye commented Oct 2, 2024

Overview

Problem

Currently if user is behind a firewall and unable to connect to altimate backend, he gets error message of "invalidate credentials".

Solution

Describe the implemented solution. Add external references if needed.

Screenshot/Demo

A picture is worth a thousand words. Please highlight the changes if applicable.

How to test

  • Steps to be followed to verify the solution or code changes
  • Mention if there is any settings configuration added/changed/deleted

Checklist

  • I have run this code and it appears to resolve the stated issue
  • README.md updated and added information about my change

Important

Adds backend connectivity check in _validateCredentials() in index.ts to prevent validation when backend is unreachable.

  • Behavior:
    • Adds a backend connectivity check in _validateCredentials() in index.ts before validating credentials.
    • Displays error message if backend is unreachable, preventing further validation attempts.
  • Functions:
    • Modifies _validateCredentials() to include checkApiConnectivity() call and handle its response.

This description was created by Ellipsis for 11d96a6. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 2, 2024

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@AdiGajbhiye has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 18 minutes and 3 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 57b5931 and 11d96a6.

Walkthrough

The changes involve updates to the ValidationProvider class in src/validation_provider/index.ts. A new asynchronous API connectivity check has been added to the _validateCredentials method. This check calls this.altimate.checkApiConnectivity() and verifies if the status is "ok". If the connectivity fails and the validation is not silent, an error message is displayed to the user. The existing validation logic for instance name and API key length remains unchanged, maintaining the overall structure of the class.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
src/validation_provider/index.ts Modified _validateCredentials method to include an asynchronous API connectivity check.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant ValidationProvider
    participant AltimateAPI

    User->>ValidationProvider: Request to validate credentials
    ValidationProvider->>AltimateAPI: checkApiConnectivity()
    AltimateAPI-->>ValidationProvider: Return status
    alt if status is "ok"
        ValidationProvider-->>User: Proceed with validation
    else
        ValidationProvider-->>User: Display error message
    end
Loading

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❌ Changes requested. Reviewed everything up to 57b5931 in 20 seconds

More details
  • Looked at 18 lines of code in 1 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 1 drafted comments based on config settings.
1. src/validation_provider/index.ts:72
  • Draft comment:
    Please specify a return type for the _validateCredentials function to improve code clarity and maintainability. This applies to other utility functions as well.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Comment was on unchanged code.

Workflow ID: wflow_J4dS3qQa52SPksbC


Want Ellipsis to fix these issues? Tag @ellipsis-dev in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

if (!silent) {
window.showErrorMessage("Unable to connect to altimate backend.");
}
return;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Consider setting this._isAuthenticated = false; here to ensure the authentication state is correctly updated when connectivity fails.

@AdiGajbhiye AdiGajbhiye changed the title fix: add check for backend connectivity while validating fix: add check for backend connectivity while validating credentials Oct 2, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 20ca78d and 57b5931.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/validation_provider/index.ts (1 hunks)

Comment on lines 75 to 81
const connectivity = await this.altimate.checkApiConnectivity();
if (connectivity?.status !== "ok") {
if (!silent) {
window.showErrorMessage("Unable to connect to altimate backend.");
}
return;
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Set _isAuthenticated to false when connectivity check fails

When the connectivity check fails, the _isAuthenticated flag is not updated. To maintain consistent authentication state and prevent potential issues due to stale authentication status, consider setting this._isAuthenticated = false when the connectivity check fails.

Apply this diff to fix the issue:

        const connectivity = await this.altimate.checkApiConnectivity();
        if (connectivity?.status !== "ok") {
          if (!silent) {
            window.showErrorMessage("Unable to connect to altimate backend.");
          }
+         this._isAuthenticated = false;
          return;
        }
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
const connectivity = await this.altimate.checkApiConnectivity();
if (connectivity?.status !== "ok") {
if (!silent) {
window.showErrorMessage("Unable to connect to altimate backend.");
}
return;
}
const connectivity = await this.altimate.checkApiConnectivity();
if (connectivity?.status !== "ok") {
if (!silent) {
window.showErrorMessage("Unable to connect to altimate backend.");
}
this._isAuthenticated = false;
return;
}

Copy link
Contributor

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 11d96a6 in 7 seconds

More details
  • Looked at 12 lines of code in 1 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 1 drafted comments based on config settings.
1. src/validation_provider/index.ts:79
  • Draft comment:
    Consider using a constant or a localization mechanism for the error message "Unable to connect to altimate backend." to facilitate easier updates and localization.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 50%
    The PR adds a connectivity check before validating credentials, which is a good addition. However, the error message for connectivity issues is hardcoded, which might not be ideal for localization or future changes.

Workflow ID: wflow_oa7iGwVaTLycCPVF


You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

@mdesmet mdesmet merged commit 3cabb35 into master Oct 3, 2024
10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants