Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Minor: remove unused parameters from record delete callback #98

Merged

Conversation

EvanHahn
Copy link
Contributor

response and results aren't used, so we can remove them.

`response` and `results` aren't used, so we can remove them.
@EvanHahn EvanHahn requested review from jbbakst and kasrak April 29, 2019 21:27
@EvanHahn EvanHahn merged commit 59d9b46 into master Apr 29, 2019
@EvanHahn EvanHahn deleted the remove_unused_parameters_from_record_delete_callback branch April 29, 2019 22:25
EvanHahn pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 9, 2019
This switches us from JSHint to ESLint, improving the quality and
consistency of our code. (We also use ESLint elsewhere at Airtable.)

To break down this change:

* We made several cleanups before this commit to ease the transition.
  See [#95][1], [#96][2], [#97][3], [#98][4], [#99][5], [#101][6] (and a
  fix in [#107][7]), [#105][8], [#109][9], [#118][10], [#119][11],
  [#120][12]
* Installed `eslint`
* Add `.eslintrc.json` and `.eslintignore` (and a slightly-different
  `.eslintrc.json` in `test`)
* Remove JSHint. Involved uninstalling the package, removing it from the
  gruntfile, and removing `jshint ignore`s.
* Update the `lint` task in `package.json`
* Update `return` into `return void 0` for consistent returns in
  `callbackToPromise`
* Add one `// eslint-disable-line` comment in a single test file
* Run `eslint --fix .`, automatically fixing all of the remaining
  warnings and errors

[1]: #95
[2]: #96
[3]: #97
[4]: #98
[5]: #99
[6]: #101
[7]: #107
[8]: #105
[9]: #109
[10]: #118
[11]: #119
[12]: #120
EvanHahn pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 10, 2019
This switches us from JSHint to ESLint, improving the quality and
consistency of our code. (We also use ESLint elsewhere at Airtable.)

To break down this change:

* We made several cleanups before this commit to ease the transition.
  See [#95][1], [#96][2], [#97][3], [#98][4], [#99][5], [#101][6] (and a
  fix in [#107][7]), [#105][8], [#109][9], [#118][10], [#119][11],
  [#120][12]
* Install `eslint`
* Add `.eslintrc.json` and `.eslintignore` (and a slightly-different
  `.eslintrc.json` in `test`)
* Remove JSHint. Involved uninstalling the package, removing it from the
  gruntfile, and removing `jshint ignore`s.
* Update the `lint` task in `package.json`
* Update `return` into `return void 0` for consistent returns in
  `callbackToPromise`
* Add one `// eslint-disable-line` comment in a single test file
* Run `eslint --fix .`, automatically fixing all of the remaining
  warnings and errors

[1]: #95
[2]: #96
[3]: #97
[4]: #98
[5]: #99
[6]: #101
[7]: #107
[8]: #105
[9]: #109
[10]: #118
[11]: #119
[12]: #120
PeterPan627 added a commit to PeterPan627/airtable.js that referenced this pull request May 28, 2023
This switches us from JSHint to ESLint, improving the quality and
consistency of our code. (We also use ESLint elsewhere at Airtable.)

To break down this change:

* We made several cleanups before this commit to ease the transition.
  See [#95][1], [#96][2], [#97][3], [#98][4], [#99][5], [#101][6] (and a
  fix in [#107][7]), [#105][8], [#109][9], [#118][10], [#119][11],
  [#120][12]
* Install `eslint`
* Add `.eslintrc.json` and `.eslintignore` (and a slightly-different
  `.eslintrc.json` in `test`)
* Remove JSHint. Involved uninstalling the package, removing it from the
  gruntfile, and removing `jshint ignore`s.
* Update the `lint` task in `package.json`
* Update `return` into `return void 0` for consistent returns in
  `callbackToPromise`
* Add one `// eslint-disable-line` comment in a single test file
* Run `eslint --fix .`, automatically fixing all of the remaining
  warnings and errors

[1]: Airtable/airtable.js#95
[2]: Airtable/airtable.js#96
[3]: Airtable/airtable.js#97
[4]: Airtable/airtable.js#98
[5]: Airtable/airtable.js#99
[6]: Airtable/airtable.js#101
[7]: Airtable/airtable.js#107
[8]: Airtable/airtable.js#105
[9]: Airtable/airtable.js#109
[10]: Airtable/airtable.js#118
[11]: Airtable/airtable.js#119
[12]: Airtable/airtable.js#120
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants