Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Br vignettes #121

Merged
merged 117 commits into from
Sep 6, 2021
Merged

Br vignettes #121

merged 117 commits into from
Sep 6, 2021

Conversation

BrentWHR
Copy link
Contributor

@BrentWHR BrentWHR commented May 3, 2021

No description provided.

@gerardhros gerardhros changed the base branch from master to development September 6, 2021 23:12
@gerardhros
Copy link
Contributor

i merged dev first in this branch.
due to the update, i need to update quite some parts of the vignettes.
i will make an issue for the aggregation score. i expect that the variance of the obi score is declining when no weighing correction is applied. is that also the case? the code can in a few sections be improved in data.table style.

@gerardhros gerardhros merged commit 06877d1 into development Sep 6, 2021
@BrentWHR
Copy link
Contributor Author

i will make an issue for the aggregation score. i expect that the variance of the obi score is declining when no weighing correction is applied. is that also the case? the code can in a few sections be improved in data.table style.

This is not the case.
The illustration in the score aggregation vignette indicates that without any correction factor, variance of total scores is slightly higher compared to applying log correction factors.
I too, expect higher variance when applying correction factors. Just to be sure; are you refering to variance in scores or to variance in indicators/input?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants